Dems plan immediate climate action.

Southern Man said:
My reply is the same to that you responded to.
Click to expand...

Like I said, you cannot back up your position, so now you attempt to run away by pretending that you have somehow 'won'. If someone posts something idiotic, I will call them on it. Just as I expect others will do to me should I say something that makes ZERO sense like your post did.
 
Superfreak said:
Like I said, you cannot back up your position, so now you attempt to run away by pretending that you have somehow 'won'. If someone posts something idiotic, I will call them on it. Just as I expect others will do to me should I say something that makes ZERO sense like your post did.
Click to expand...

I call you on that every day, and it has never made a difference?
 
Superfreak said:
Like I said, you cannot back up your position, so now you attempt to run away by pretending that you have somehow 'won'. If someone posts something idiotic, I will call them on it. Just as I expect others will do to me should I say something that makes ZERO sense like your post did.
Click to expand...
Again, I have long been established that if you venture into personal insults in a debate then your opponent has scored points, and in this instance that would be me. There seems to be an inability among several members of this board to comprehend this simple fact. If you and your friends want to indulge in a flame fest or what have you, then by all means knock yourselves out. The Southern Man, however, chooses not to partake in such juvenile behavior. You may call it "running away", but I call it taking the high road instead of waddling in the gutter.
 
Southern Man said:
Again, I have long been established that if you venture into personal insults in a debate then your opponent has scored points, and in this instance that would be me. There seems to be an inability among several members of this board to comprehend this simple fact. If you and your friends want to indulge in a flame fest or what have you, then by all means knock yourselves out. The Southern Man, however, chooses not to partake in such juvenile behavior. You may call it "running away", but I call it taking the high road instead of waddling in the gutter.
Click to expand...

LMAO... so in other words you are not going to back up your pathetic claim. Because in the real world, when you put forth an argument without anything to back it up... you lose. When you put forth an argument that completely contradicts what the evidence states, then you are a friggin moron. Pointing out your ignorance does not detract from the fact that you are hopelessly wrong.

But go ahead and continue on in your fantasy world.... live in denial. Idiots are usually quite good at that.
 
Onceler said:
No one can ever address the aspect of waste when it comes to nukes. The debate always devolves into something else.

There is no long-term solution for the waste, and its incredibly irresponsible on a generational level to just ignore that.
Click to expand...
This is false, nuclear waste already is handled, it's sealed in special containers and then stored underground. It's also worth mentioning that nuclear waste itself is incredibly small:
http://www.world-nuclear.org/education/wast.htm

Lastly, let's try and remember what nuclear waste is, it's spent uranium. Is natural and unprocessed uranium dangerous? Yes.
So it's dangerous BEFORE and AFTER we touch it. The difference being that after it's used we:
A) ensure it is sealed
B) know its location
which is more than you can say for natural uranium existing throughout the world.
 
ib1yysguy said:
Is Obama a liberal? Is Obama championing nuclear energy? Yes and yes. Many liberals support it. So you were deaf or blind or just plain dishonest. I'm guessing you're dishonest.
Click to expand...
He is? Link? Really. The last I heard Obama talk about Nuclear Energy he told me he was "not a big fan". That doesn't sound like "championing".

Something may have changed, but that is what I remember.
 
Damocles said:
He is? Link? Really. The last I heard Obama talk about Nuclear Energy he told me he was "not a big fan". That doesn't sound like "championing".

Something may have changed, but that is what I remember.
Click to expand...

I believe it was an article in Time magazine. The technical challenges of reactors aren't that difficult to overcome. It's a public perception problem. Obama is pro nuclear energy, but not as a "silver bullet" solution. It needs to be a part of a larger energy solution (OMG, this is starting to sound more complicated than what Republicans typically like!)
 
ib1yysguy said:
I believe it was an article in Time magazine. The technical challenges of reactors aren't that difficult to overcome. It's a public perception problem. Obama is pro nuclear energy, but not as a "silver bullet" solution. It needs to be a part of a larger energy solution (OMG, this is starting to sound more complicated than what Republicans typically like!)
Click to expand...

Yes. It's a public perception problem. We don't believe your lies. Yours or obamas. And I hate republicans.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top