Democrats who support(ed) Bush's war BEWARE!

Status
Not open for further replies.
LadyT said:
Yes it does. However on this issue need to send a message to our reps on how we want to proceed. Undying support of something that has OBVIOUSLY failed shouldn't be rewarded with another term. Good riddance.
Click to expand...
Since we only allow for two parties in this nation, those tents have to be really big in order to work. Anyone who thinks Dennis Kucinich -- Remember him? -- was a wild-eyed radical has never seen a real radical. Which would mean that the damned tents are way too small.

The R's embrace the far right wackos. It's high time for the D's to make some room for real leftists. Which is not to say that Lamont is one. It's just that Lieberman is too far to the right to be considered a mainstream Democrat. He's an extremely conservative Democrat, at best, and probably shouldn't be in a position of national prominence for that reason.

The tent's not getting any smaller, it's just being moved a bit.
 
OrnotBitwise said:
Since we only allow for two parties in this nation, those tents have to be really big in order to work. Anyone who thinks Dennis Kucinich -- Remember him? -- was a wild-eyed radical has never seen a real radical. Which would mean that the damned tents are way too small.

The R's embrace the far right wackos. It's high time for the D's to make some room for real leftists. Which is not to say that Lamont is one. It's just that Lieberman is too far to the right to be considered a mainstream Democrat. He's an extremely conservative Democrat, at best, and probably shouldn't be in a position of national prominence for that reason.

The tent's not getting any smaller, it's just being moved a bit.
Click to expand...


That maybe true .. but if you embrace the far left agenda .. you will lose mainstream America ..

As far as Lieberman being too far right ... lol Take a look at this voting record pal ...
 
klaatu said:
That maybe true .. but if you embrace the far left agenda .. you will lose mainstream America ..

As far as Lieberman being too far right ... lol Take a look at this voting record pal ...
Click to expand...

yes 60% against the war in Iraq... LIEberman supporting it ten fold in addition to changing the rules...

way out of mainstream america! good save klaatu ;)
 
klaatu said:
That maybe true .. but if you embrace the far left agenda .. you will lose mainstream America ..

As far as Lieberman being too far right ... lol Take a look at this voting record pal ...
Click to expand...

Brand R embraced the doctor-murderers and gasoline swilling cousin humpers. They didn't lose "mainstream America." Well, actually, they've lost part of it but they're willing to live with that. We must restore balance, Luke.

I have looked at Lieberman's voting record. As I said, he's pretty conservative . . . for a traditional Democrat. That's the all important qualifier.

Look, I'd rather leave the Dems to become the wishy-washy, limp-wristed centrist party. I'd rather have a multi-party system. That's not going to happen anytime soon, though. Until it does, the Dems need to make some room for people on my end of the spectrum. If that means pushing out some people on the right, well, tough. Let 'em go to the Repukes.
 
klaatu said:
That maybe true .. but if you embrace the far left agenda .. you will lose mainstream America ..

As far as Lieberman being too far right ... lol Take a look at this voting record pal ...
Click to expand...


Lieberman voted on the wrong side on the war, and still defends that vote...
Lieberman voted on the wrong side on the schiavo issue...

Two indefensable votes.

Any Sennator on the wrong side of these votes should loose his seat, unless he admits his mistake and sufficently explains himself!
 
Jarod said:
Leiberman appears to be loosing...!
Click to expand...

Please, get real.

Democrats and republicans who supported the war can comfortably find themselves a place in Obama's administration .. including Lieberman .. who Obama rescued.

Those left on the outside are democrats WHO DID NOT SUPPPORT THE WAR. I don't think there is one of them in Obama's administration .. and he can count of the subject-like weakness of his supporters to not even make a peep about that.

At what point do we recognize the bullshit game of "good cop. bad cop" that democrats and republicans play on the American people.

Small wonder how Bush could have served two terms.
 
blackascoal said:
Please, get real.

Democrats and republicans who supported the war can comfortably find themselves a place in Obama's administration .. including Lieberman .. who Obama rescued.

Those left on the outside are democrats WHO DID NOT SUPPPORT THE WAR. I don't think there is one of them in Obama's administration .. and he can count of the subject-like weakness of his supporters to not even make a peep about that.

At what point do we recognize the bullshit game of "good cop. bad cop" that democrats and republicans play on the American people.

Small wonder how Bush could have served two terms.
Click to expand...
Dang.

We agree. I have to go and research something so we can disagree and the natural order of things will be restored.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top