Democrats understand science, Republicans defy it

Into the Night said:
You think so? Not true. I just happen to understand the rules of logic, including that particular proof.

2, to a degree. Instruments are great at extending our own natural senses, but they are only so accurate. Fortunately, we can determine their tolerance as well.


I'm not trying to interrupt its application.
Click to expand...

Then you must reject the bible genesis story and all the superstitious bullshit throughout the cobbled together biblical fable, new and old testament.
If not, Into the night, you are a liar to us and perhaps to yourself. I have zero respect for you and forever you shall suffer my block!
 
Damocles said:
Personally? I think it is a myth... However, if I were to believe I'd be more along the lines that the 7 days was accelerated timeline. An all powerful being could absolutely accelerate time while directing evolution to make 4 billion years happen in just a few "days".

The reality is it tells you how long each of the people lived. It isn't difficult to add up that timeline. You can blame Usscher, and you wouldn't be wrong in a large part, but the story itself tells you how long the people lived in the "begats". Adding it all up and even being generous with time doesn't get you 4+ billion years, no matter how hard you try to make it happen.
Click to expand...

An all powerful being could.....


duh.
 
Micawber said:
An all powerful being could.....


duh.
Click to expand...

Right. Should I wish to believe that would be where I would apply the magic powers to explain my beliefs. It is relatively simple... If you want science and your mythology to meet hand in hand it isn't difficult... Then we can all start figuring out the natural laws, and the believers can be in awe and figure out the "how" each of these things were done without worrying about it. Atheists and Christians could work in science without some of them trying to "prove" that Earth is only 10K years old...
 
Damocles said:
Personally? I think it is a myth... However, if I were to believe I'd be more along the lines that the 7 days was accelerated timeline. An all powerful being could absolutely accelerate time while directing evolution to make 4 billion years happen in just a few "days".
.
Click to expand...

wrong time line......I'm talking about the gap between creation and the fall.......I think a lot of people expect that since all you have to do is turn a page it must have happened right away........it could have as easily been millions of years........
 
The study of what caused life is scientific when scientists are the ones doing it and employing the scientific method. The study of creation is not science when religious or magical explanations are assumed.
Evolution is a scientific theory because it was arrived at using the scientific method. The genesis story is not a scientific story because it was arrived at
not by using the scientific method. This is pretty basic and simple stuff people. Doubt me simply go to a database like pub med and search string evolution in all the peer reviewed literature
and see the millions of references to evolution and try the same with creation or design and find nothing.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
wrong time line......I'm talking about the gap between creation and the fall.......I think a lot of people expect that since all you have to do is turn a page it must have happened right away........it could have as easily been millions of years........
Click to expand...

4.5 Billion is the age of the Earth, not "millions"... as I said even being generous with the timeline it's a weak argument, like the ones that say that dinosaurs and humans shared the Earth at some point. It just isn't true.
 
Damocles said:
4.5 Billion is the age of the Earth, not "millions"... as I said even being generous with the timeline it's a weak argument, like the ones that say that dinosaurs and humans shared the Earth at some point. It just isn't true.
Click to expand...

personally I don't know anyone who says that......I will let you argue with them......
 
Into the Night said:
Those that believe in the 'global warming' can't even define the phrase other than by itself. It's just a buzzword...meaninigless.

You have assumed that all registered voters are believers in the religion of 'global warming'. This is actually bigotry. It is a compositional error fallacy involving people as the class. Registered voters are made up of people that belong to this religion, and also those that don't.
Believers in the Church of Global Warming deny science and mathematics.
Click to expand...

its science you fucking idiot


all you have is an idiots meme
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top