Getin the ring
Verified User
please don't misread and think that we do not hope, even pray that the left keeps pushing the narrative,
It's your whinefest, you own it
the numbers say unmistakably that that favors Trump
Democrats subpoena more Trump ex-aides, including Hicks
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
please don't misread and think that we do not hope, even pray that the left keeps pushing the narrative,
It's your whinefest, you own it
the numbers say unmistakably that that favors Trump
Because the FRAUDOCRATS are seeking to impugn on Executive Branch rights, by trying to FORCE TESTIMONY from people who still have attorney/client fiduciary responsibility. That DOES NOT END when a client is no longer one's client.
They HAVE NO LEGAL BASIS for THUIIS BULLSHIT.
reagansghost
eternal
this isn't over sucker, no matter what Hannity tells ya
reagansghost
eternal
you're lying, you haven't read shit except what Barr pulled out of his humongous ass
BULLSHIT. Read the FOURTH AMENDMENT.
Then,, by all means, QUOTE THE CONSTITUTION GIVING CONGRESS UNIVERSAL , UNLIMITED AUTHORITY OVER AMERICANS, STALIN.
Last edited:
LIE and LAME. Is that all you are capable of snowflake; parroting the moronic bullshit you are fed by CNN and MSNBC?
I have. Perhaps you should attempt it. Let me summarize it for you; no collusion, no conspiracy and no obsturction. What part are you having so much difficulty comprehending?
Not if they have done nothing wrong; and certainly not if the President exerts executive privilege. Again, what crimes have been committed?
It was over in 2016; you, the FAKE media and the liberal left lack the IQ it would take to comprehend that FACT.
Ironic in that almost all of your posts are lies. That is something else I have noticed, liberals are not merely dumb and liars, they have ZERO self awareness.
That's what DOJ says.
The immunity of the President’s immediate advisers from compelled congressional testimony on matters related to their official responsibilities has long been recognized and arises from the fundamental workings of the separation of powers.
This immunity applies to former senior advisers such as the former White House Counsel.
https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1164186/download
In 1957, the Supreme Court held in Watkins v. U.S. that a congressional information demand must relate to a “legitimate task of the Congress” and noted that Congress is not a “law enforcement agency” that can seek information to uncover or expose crimes.
Indeed.
There's also this:
Attorney General Janet Reno explained, “subjecting a senior presidential advisor to the congressional subpoena power would be akin to requiring the President himself to appear before Congress on matters relating to the performance of his constitutionally assigned executive functions.” Assertion of Executive Privilege with Respect to Clemency Decision, 23 Op. O.L.C. 1, 5 (1999) (“Reno Opinion”).
https://www.justice.gov/olc/file/1164186/download
I can’t imagine their legal fees. I wouldn’t fight it. It’s not worth it for someone like Trump.
Callinectes
Proud MAGA Semi-Facist
From clinton news nutwork: "The committee issued the subpoenas to Hicks and Donaldson as part of their sweeping investigation into POSSIBLE obstruction of justice, corruption and abuse of power."
In other words, it's a do-over tantrum/publicity stunt
That is the ultimate goal of the Party of the Jackass; if you can't find any criminal behavior, if the Mueller report was a flop, attempt to bankrupt anyone connected with this Presidency.
Yep, you morons on the liberal left act like third world Fascists. Another very good reason to hand the Party of the Jackass a massive defeat in 2020.
Imagine the sad state of our politics if BOTH parties acted out like this every time they lost elections. Of course, you lack the grey matter between your ears it would take to comprehend the OBVIOUS.
You can answer your own question, tell us specifically, what crimes is Barr supposedly investigating? Has any criminal act been proven committed that justifys Barr investigating? What is the purpose of Barr's investigation that you Trumpkins are so giddy about? Show us the crimes that someone has been found guilty of committing?
Do you need a further explanation?
This line is an instant classic, "Imagine the sad state of our politics if BOTH parties acted out like this every time they lost elections," seems "truthie" is in a state of denial with a selective memory
First off, the Democrats have only been investigating for only five months now, seems we have to remind "truthie" again, Mueller was a Special Council appointed by a Trump nominee in a Trump Justice Department.
Secondly, since 2009, the GOP and the right wing media working together have investigating and litigating anything and everything Obama/Hillary 24/7 for over a decade. If any precedent was been set, the icons you worship set it back in 2009
"Imagine the sad state of our politics if BOTH parties acted out like this every time they lost elections," priceless
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
I am still trying to understand what crimes have been committed by Trump. The Democrats can't seem to come up with any. What are they going to impeach him for? Obstruction without any evidence to support that asinine claim?
Pull your head out of Donald Trump's rectum, and you will see for yourself idiot!
There are a lot of idiots here in this forum, but you are the No. 1 Idiot here in this forum. Congratulations!
