True.
The failing New York Times just published an editorial calling on the usurper's regime to create a "Reality Czar" to suppress free speech.
I suspect they ran it by the dictator's handlers to make sure he approves before they suggested it.
Bet you the left-tards here think it's a great idea.
Bet you the left-tards here think it's a great idea.
Don't ever use the word think we know you don't do that
Leftists do not "think". They conform to whatever their thought-leaders proclaim, whether it's inconsistent or not.
I was being kind. This is the kinder gentler me
I was being kind. This is the kinder gentler me
True.
The failing New York Times just published an editorial calling on the usurper's regime to create a "Reality Czar" to suppress free speech.
I suspect they ran it by the dictator's handlers to make sure he approves before they suggested it.
Kinder gentleness cost us control of the nation.
Have you read what the regime has in store for this forum (and us)?
Here are some excerpts:
The experts agreed that before the Biden administration can tackle disinformation and extremism, it needs to understand the scope of the problem.
“It’s really important that we have a holistic understanding of what the spectrum of violent extremism looks like in the United States, and then allocate resources accordingly,” said William Braniff, a professor at the University of Maryland.
Joan Donovan, the research director of Harvard University’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, suggested that the Biden administration could set up a “truth commission.”
“We must open the hood on social media so that civil rights lawyers and real watchdog organizations can investigate human rights abuses enabled or amplified by technology,” Dr. Donovan said.
These experts were heartened that the Biden administration had already announced a “comprehensive threat assessment” of domestic extremism.
Appoint a ‘reality czar.’
Several experts I spoke with recommended that the Biden administration put together a cross-agency task force to tackle disinformation and domestic extremism, which would be led by something like a “reality czar.”
Renée DiResta, a disinformation researcher at Stanford’s Internet Observatory, said instead of two parallel processes — one at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and another at the Federal Election Commission, a centralized task force could coordinate a single, strategic response.
“If each of them are doing it distinctly and independently, you run the risk of missing connections, both in terms of the content and in terms of the tactics that are used to execute on the campaigns,” Ms. DiResta said.
This task force could also meet regularly with tech platforms, and push for structural changes that could help those companies.
For example, it could formulate “safe harbor” exemptions that would allow platforms to share data with researchers and government agencies without running afoul of privacy laws.
And it could become the tip of the spear for the federal government’s response.
You might not even need legislation to get these companies to open up.
Last year, under the threat of a forced breakup, TikTok pledged to allow experts to examine its algorithm to prove it wasn’t maliciously manipulating American users.
Given their current antitrust issues, other social networks might respond to a similar nudge.
The experts I spoke with warned that tech platforms alone couldn’t bring back the millions of already radicalized Americans, nor is teaching media literacy a silver bullet to prevent dangerous ideas from taking hold.
“Clearly there’s a public safety issue, but there’s also very much a public health issue,” said Micah Clark, a program director at Moonshot CVE, a counter-extremism firm in London.
One effective countermeasure, Mr. Clark suggested, could be a kind of “social stimulus” — a series of federal programs to encourage people to get off their screens and into community-based activities that could keep them engaged and occupied.
But there are interventions that seem to work on a smaller scale, too — like a series of “de-escalation” ads that Moonshot CVE ran on Google and Twitter, targeting high-risk potential extremists with empathetic messages.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/02/technology/biden-reality-crisis-misinformation.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytmedia
Kinder gentleness cost us control of the nation.
Have you read what the regime has in store for this forum (and us)?
Here are some excerpts:
The experts agreed that before the Biden administration can tackle disinformation and extremism, it needs to understand the scope of the problem.
“It’s really important that we have a holistic understanding of what the spectrum of violent extremism looks like in the United States, and then allocate resources accordingly,” said William Braniff, a professor at the University of Maryland.
Joan Donovan, the research director of Harvard University’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, suggested that the Biden administration could set up a “truth commission.”
“We must open the hood on social media so that civil rights lawyers and real watchdog organizations can investigate human rights abuses enabled or amplified by technology,” Dr. Donovan said.
These experts were heartened that the Biden administration had already announced a “comprehensive threat assessment” of domestic extremism.
Appoint a ‘reality czar.’
Several experts I spoke with recommended that the Biden administration put together a cross-agency task force to tackle disinformation and domestic extremism, which would be led by something like a “reality czar.”
Renée DiResta, a disinformation researcher at Stanford’s Internet Observatory, said instead of two parallel processes — one at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and another at the Federal Election Commission, a centralized task force could coordinate a single, strategic response.
“If each of them are doing it distinctly and independently, you run the risk of missing connections, both in terms of the content and in terms of the tactics that are used to execute on the campaigns,” Ms. DiResta said.
This task force could also meet regularly with tech platforms, and push for structural changes that could help those companies.
For example, it could formulate “safe harbor” exemptions that would allow platforms to share data with researchers and government agencies without running afoul of privacy laws.
And it could become the tip of the spear for the federal government’s response.
You might not even need legislation to get these companies to open up.
Last year, under the threat of a forced breakup, TikTok pledged to allow experts to examine its algorithm to prove it wasn’t maliciously manipulating American users.
Given their current antitrust issues, other social networks might respond to a similar nudge.
The experts I spoke with warned that tech platforms alone couldn’t bring back the millions of already radicalized Americans, nor is teaching media literacy a silver bullet to prevent dangerous ideas from taking hold.
“Clearly there’s a public safety issue, but there’s also very much a public health issue,” said Micah Clark, a program director at Moonshot CVE, a counter-extremism firm in London.
One effective countermeasure, Mr. Clark suggested, could be a kind of “social stimulus” — a series of federal programs to encourage people to get off their screens and into community-based activities that could keep them engaged and occupied.
But there are interventions that seem to work on a smaller scale, too — like a series of “de-escalation” ads that Moonshot CVE ran on Google and Twitter, targeting high-risk potential extremists with empathetic messages.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/02/technology/biden-reality-crisis-misinformation.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytmedia
WHITE Supremacist Attacked The US Capital Building ...
Not The Left
THE INFORMATION MINISTRY, BY ANY OTHER NAME.....
Er, um...this is really awkward...
“One of the many great things about our just signed giant Trade Deal with China is that it will bring both the USA & China closer together in so many other ways. Terrific working with President Xi, a man who truly loves his country. Much more to come!”
-Donald Trump, January 24th, 2020
“And, honestly, I think, as tough as this negotiation was, I think our relationship with China now might be the best it's been in a long, long time. And now it's reciprocal. Before, we were being ripped off badly. Now we have a reciprocal relationship, maybe even better than reciprocal for us.”
-Donald Trump, January 29th, 2020
"China is not in great shape right now, unfortunately. But they're working very hard. We'll see what happens. But we're working very closely with China and other countries."
-Donald Trump, January 30th, 2020
"I just spoke to President Xi last night, and, you know, we're working on the — the problem, the virus. It's a — it's a very tough situation. But I think he's going to handle it. I think he's handled it really well. We're helping wherever we can."
-Donald Trump, February 7th, 2020
“Just had a long and very good conversation by phone with President Xi of China. He is strong, sharp and powerfully focused on leading the counterattack on the Coronavirus. He feels they are doing very well, even building hospitals in a matter of only days … Great discipline is taking place in China, as President Xi strongly leads what will be a very successful operation. We are working closely with China to help!
-Donald Trump, February 7th, 2020
"Late last night, I had a very good talk with President Xi, and we talked about — mostly about the coronavirus. They're working really hard, and I think they are doing a very professional job. They're in touch with World — the World — World Organization. CDC also. We're working together. But World Health is working with them. CDC is working with them. I had a great conversation last night with President Xi. It's a tough situation. I think they're doing a very good job.”
-Donald Trump, February 7th, 2020
"I think China is very, you know, professionally run in the sense that they have everything under control," Drumpf said. "I really believe they are going to have it under control fairly soon. You know in April, supposedly, it dies with the hotter weather. And that's a beautiful date to look forward to. But China I can tell you is working very hard."
-Donald Trump, February 10th, 2020
“I spoke with President Xi, and they’re working very, very hard. And I think it’s all going to work out fine.”
-Donald Trump, February 10th, 2020
“I think they've handled it professionally and I think they're extremely capable and I think President Xi is extremely capable and I hope that it's going to be resolved."
-Donald Trump, February 13th, 2020
“I think President Xi is working very hard. As you know, I spoke with him recently. He’s working really hard. It’s a tough problem. I think he’s going to do — look, I’ve seen them build hospitals in a short period of time. I really believe he wants to get that done, and he wants to get it done fast. Yes, I think he’s doing it very professionally.”
-Donald Trump, February 18th, 2020
"I think President Xi is working very, very hard. I spoke to him. He's working very hard. I think he's doing a very good job. It's a big problem. But President Xi loves his country. He's working very hard to solve the problem, and he will solve the problem. OK?"
-Donald Trump, February 23rd, 2020
“China is working very, very hard. I have spoken to President Xi, and they’re working very hard. And if you know anything about him, I think he’ll be in pretty good shape. They’re — they’ve had a rough patch, and I think right now they have it — it looks like they’re getting it under control more and more. They’re getting it more and more under control.”
-Donald Trump, February 26th, 2020
“I spoke with President Xi. We had a great talk. He’s working very hard, I have to say. He’s working very, very hard. And if you can count on the reports coming out of China, that spread has gone down quite a bit. The infection seems to have gone down over the last two days. As opposed to getting larger, it’s actually gotten smaller.”
-Donald Trump, February 27th, 2020
“China seems to be making tremendous progress. Their numbers are way down. … I think our relationship with China is very good. We just did a big trade deal. We’re starting on another trade deal with China — a very big one. And we’ve been working very closely. They’ve been talking to our people, we’ve been talking to their people, having to do with the virus.”
-Donald Trump, February 29th, 2020
Yes I saw it. And the idiots have no idea why people hate the left in this country
TRUMP FORCED THEM TO SUBMIT TO THE NEW TRADE DEAL PHASE ONE, VIA TARRIFSS; HE CONFRONTED THEM OVER THE CHINA SEA.
BIDEN WILL END BOTH...ALREASDY HAS.
"CHINA IS NOT A THREAT" - JOE BIDEN