Democrats in trouble?

I grew up listening to Hank Williams Sr. and those like him (juke box at the local bowling alley).

When HW Jr. made this, it moved me.

Thanks :good4u:

LOL, I actually prefer senior over Junior. But in this song he really does emulate his father, it's almost uncanny.
 
I just watched the 2 hr PBS documentary Trump's Showdown 18/10/02.

News Flash:

The United States has trouble in abundance!
The bulk of it can be found at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. in Washington DC.

Don't take my word for it. Watch the documentary. Find ONE assertion therein in substantial error, and I'll retract my assertion with apology.

44a259045d6bc18697b7bc4ddaaf002acfc7ea0.gif


With President Trump in office, we are ALL in trouble!


Good luck getting any of the r/w redneck goobers around here to drag themselves away from Duck Dynasty and NASCAR long enough to watch PBS. :laugh:
 
Because after all the panty-pissing you hypocrites do about judicial activism, what you really want are your own judicial activists.

You rwnj's want rwnj judges to create bullshit law like Citizens United and make it so that any slobbering, misanthropic, homicidal lunatic can go into any 7 Eleven and buy all the handguns and ammo he can haul away in a wheelbarrow.

Fucking hypocrites.

I do not want judicial activists.

there is a false dichotomy set up by liberals. To be a constitutionalist, is to be a conservative. Conservatives seek to preserve the status quo, and original intent. If you want to change the constitution that is called the amendment process. Liberals by their nature are anti-constitution. They do not believe in the tenants of the constitution (unless it's convienent for them). There is no right or left when it comes to judicial philosophy, only right and wrong, and liberals support wrong.
 
and believe it or not I did not like citizens united but I think it is constitutionally sound. I also don't like obamacare but I don't think the logic that it's a tax is unconstitutional either (if you accept the premise that congress gets to tax you for whatever reason, which we sadly have plenty of established precedent for).

I support what the constitution says, not what I like. That's why a month or so ago gorsuch made a ruling liberals like and while liberals where laughing on here, I didn't mind at all. Because I don't desire particular outcomes beyond the constitution being adhered to
 
Understood.
And rather than refute a single point in it, I expect any that lower themselves to even comment on it will dismiss by ad hom. You know the drill, ... aaaaah, that's just lefty PBS

None the less I believe I've spelled the name of the Frontline piece correctly. I suspect it can be streamed from PBS.org
So they don't have to tune to PBS. They can watch it on their computer, or mobile.

But I confess, they do a monumental disservice to pseudo-cons to demonstrate themselves so closed-minded, & such predatory partisans. News flash to them all: the GOP is not more important than the USA.
 
I do not want judicial activists.

there is a false dichotomy set up by liberals. To be a constitutionalist, is to be a conservative. Conservatives seek to preserve the status quo, and original intent. If you want to change the constitution that is called the amendment process. Liberals by their nature are anti-constitution. They do not believe in the tenants of the constitution (unless it's convienent for them). There is no right or left when it comes to judicial philosophy, only right and wrong, and liberals support wrong.

You mean original intent like "corporations are people too"? :rofl2:

Puh-lease. :palm:

Save the phony rehearsed sales pitch for those who are gullible enough to buy it.
 
and believe it or not I did not like citizens united but I think it is constitutionally sound. I also don't like obamacare but I don't think the logic that it's a tax is unconstitutional either (if you accept the premise that congress gets to tax you for whatever reason, which we sadly have plenty of established precedent for).

I support what the constitution says, not what I like. That's why a month or so ago gorsuch made a ruling liberals like and while liberals where laughing on here, I didn't mind at all. Because I don't desire particular outcomes beyond the constitution being adhered to

The 2nd Amendment that says "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...." but I bet you don't give a rat's ass about being part of a WELL REGULATED MILITIA as a prerequisite to gun ownership, amirite?

Of course I am. :thup:
 
The 2nd Amendment that says "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State...." but I bet you don't give a rat's ass about being part of a WELL REGULATED MILITIA as a prerequisite to gun ownership, amirite?

Of course I am. :thup:

It doesn't say that that's a "prerequisite". :laugh:
 
It's all in the way you interpret it.

If it wasn't meant as a prerequisite, why did they bother putting it in?

NO, it's pretty clear and needs no interpretation.

To avoid any future elected officials from being able to disarm the populace of the US.

Were you never educated on this??
 
News Flash for you Low/No Information folks.

The Democrats have been in trouble since 2010.

The Democrat Party has lost over 1200 seats nationwide since 2010.

They hold less seats in Congress today than since the 1920's.

HRC captured only 20 of the 50 states, most of them being large metropolitan areas on the coast.

The Democrats hold only 14 of the 50 Governor seats in the Country.

The Democrat Party can really no longer even be considered an National Party.

Maybe a Coastal Party at best.

It's shocking how you guys can't see what has happened to your party.

The slobbering, spittle flying rabid Democrats are mad and derranged in their Trump hatreds. Their public behavior via all their fringe angry screaming groups, and their narcissistic self-aggrandizing politicians they've put in office has cost them credibility, honor, and any hope for taking back power.

#redwaveiscoming
 
NO, it's pretty clear and needs no interpretation.

To avoid any future elected officials from being able to disarm the populace of the US.

Were you never educated on this??

So why did they include the words WELL REGULATED MILITIA if it doesn't mean anything?

Can you answer that?
 
The slobbering, spittle flying rabid Democrats are mad and derranged in their Trump hatreds. Their public behavior via all their fringe angry screaming groups, and their narcissistic self-aggrandizing politicians they've put in office has cost them credibility, honor, and any hope for taking back power.

Trump is the worst congenital liar and crook in the history of American politics.

Why do you support him?

Do you possess those same personal characteristics?
 
Back
Top