Democrats had this mom testify that she'll starve without food stamps

She is not on Food Stamps. She testified in front of the Colorado legislature a decade ago to force police to investigate missing children more quickly. The picture was altered to add the Food Stamps junk.

She is working to prevent other children from being tortured to death, like her daughter. I am not really sure why you are opposing her on this.
So did Amy Klobuchar (D) alter it? And lie? You are one Goddamn stupid fucking idiot


View: https://x.com/amyklobuchar/status/1932996233137717619
 
Last edited:
For the record, that is Jessica Ridgeway's mother. Her daughter was murdered in an all Republican area of Colorado, and at first the police did not even want to investigate. She has nothing to do with Food Stamps.

As for being morbidly obese, her daughter was tortured to death, so I think that might be the least of her problems.

Once again, the alt right shows a complete lack of class.


LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Well, no, Never Right Walter.

I am 6’2” and 180 lbs. plus or minus a few lbs.

My fighting weight, since my military days has been 180 lbs and I have not been more than 5 lbs from that weight.

I was at 165 when I played second base in college and I was spiked many times but I bloodied a few runners’ noses and broke one nose.

Of course this is anecdotal but you know I am honest…right?
3rd base here. And right wing/defense at hockey.
 
She was talking about when the 21 was a kid. :rolleyes:
That's not the way I heard it.

A second question. Four kids. How many dads? She is a "single mom" after all. Sounds to me like she brought that shit show on herself through stupid decisions. Why should the public be forced to pay her for being a moron?

If she was instead in a stable relationship and married the dad in that picture (note the singular) could contribute to the household. Again, she is a fuck up and a moron. That's really the heart of the problem here.
 
That's not the way I heard it.

A second question. Four kids. How many dads? She is a "single mom" after all. Sounds to me like she brought that shit show on herself through stupid decisions. Why should the public be forced to pay her for being a moron?
When she had her oldest daughter.

Apparently you missed the part where she worked three jobs. Also the public isn't paying for her but for her children.
 
When she had her oldest daughter.

Apparently you missed the part where she worked three jobs. Also the public isn't paying for her but for her children.
Doesn't change the point I made above.

How many dads? She didn't get pregnant by immaculate conception four times. Seems to me the answer is between 1 and 4. That's a problem. Where is / are the dad(s)? Why aren't they involved in this situation? Does she even know who the dad(s) is / are?

She made that shit show herself. I don't have a lot of sympathy for people who are clearly stupid.
 
Doesn't change the point I made above.

How many dads? She didn't get pregnant by immaculate conception four times. Seems to me the answer is between 1 and 4. That's a problem. Where is / are the dad(s)? Why aren't they involved in this situation? Does she even know who the dad(s) is / are?

She made that shit show herself. I don't have a lot of sympathy for people who are clearly stupid.
It's your speculation.

Why make it about her? It's about the children. Clearly she cares.

Have some sympathy for the innocent children.
 
It's your speculation.

Speculation that some guy got her pregnant? Are you joking? Of course, one or more guys are involved here.
Why make it about her? It's about the children. Clearly she cares.

She is a parent. She is involved as the caretaker of the kids. She can 150% care. That doesn't change the question: Where is the dad(s)? Every state in the US makes the guy pay child support when the mother has custody.
Have some sympathy for the innocent children.
Your appeal to pity is irrelevant. The "innocent children" would be far better off in a stable two-parent household where the father is working full time.
 
Speculation that some guy got her pregnant? Are you joking? Of course, one or more guys are involved here.
Speculation to what really happened.
She is a parent. She is involved as the caretaker of the kids. She can 150% care. That doesn't change the question: Where is the dad(s)? Every state in the US makes the guy pay child support when the mother has custody.
I don't know. They could be dead or in prison. Irrelevant to the fact that the children need to be fed.
Your appeal to pity is irrelevant. The "innocent children" would be far better off in a stable two-parent household where the father is working full time.
So it is your position that they separate the children from a caring and hard working mom and place them in the state custody?
 
Speculation to what really happened.

She had at least one of the following happen.

Was raped. Virtually nil chance of that happening four times.

She had consensual, gratuitous sex on repeated occasions with one or more men and got pregnant four times.
I don't know. They could be dead or in prison. Irrelevant to the fact that the children need to be fed.

They could. That doesn't change that we should be told what the status of the father(s) involved here are. They can help feed the kids.
So it is your position that they separate the children from a caring and hard working mom and place them in the state custody?
No. I have no idea where you came up with that. I'm saying that her position is one of her own making and is likely due in large part to stupidity. Some other questions I'd ask:

Does she have a cable TV / internet service bill?
Does she have a smart phone bill?
Do the kids have smart phones?
Where does she live?
What does the living conditions at her house look like?

Where I'm going is that getting pregnant repeatedly isn't the only stupid thing she's doing in her life.
 
She had at least one of the following happen.

Was raped. Virtually nil chance of that happening four times.

She had consensual, gratuitous sex on repeated occasions with one or more men and got pregnant four times.


They could. That doesn't change that we should be told what the status of the father(s) involved here are. They can help feed the kids.

No. I have no idea where you came up with that. I'm saying that her position is one of her own making and is likely due in large part to stupidity. Some other questions I'd ask:

Does she have a cable TV / internet service bill?
Does she have a smart phone bill?
Do the kids have smart phones?
Where does she live?
What does the living conditions at her house look like?

Where I'm going is that getting pregnant repeatedly isn't the only stupid thing she's doing in her life.
And you continue to ignore the fact that she has worked three jobs. Losing SNAP benefits is going to make it more difficult. I'm sure you'd agree with that without being a contrarian.
 
And you continue to ignore the fact that she has worked three jobs. Losing SNAP benefits is going to make it more difficult. I'm sure you'd agree with that without being a contrarian.
Irrelevant. Whether she worked 1 job or 10 makes no difference. She obviously couldn't get a decent paying job due to either to physical and / or mental limitations. Losing SNAP or other welfare benefits would make it more difficult for her, but she dug the hole and now she expects others to get her out of it.
 
Irrelevant. Whether she worked 1 job or 10 makes no difference. She obviously couldn't get a decent paying job due to either to physical and / or mental limitations. Losing SNAP or other welfare benefits would make it more difficult for her, but she dug the hole and now she expects others to get her out of it.
Expects? She's hoping the benefits for her children will not be taken away. That would be cruel.
 
Expects? She's hoping the benefits for her children will not be taken away. That would be cruel.
It's cruel that the kids are growing up in a single parent household.

Worldwide, not just in the US, single parent households headed by a female are the most likely to live in poverty



Worse, if the children are male, they are far more likely to end up becoming criminals and engaging in other destructive behavior.




No amount of government handouts will fix those problems. So, the Democrats were just grandstanding and gaslighting having that whale testify before congress.
 
It's cruel that the kids are growing up in a single parent household.

Worldwide, not just in the US, single parent households headed by a female are the most likely to live in poverty



Worse, if the children are male, they are far more likely to end up becoming criminals and engaging in other destructive behavior.




No amount of government handouts will fix those problems. So, the Democrats were just grandstanding and gaslighting having that whale testify before congress.
So no help for those poor children?
 
Back
Top