PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
you ARE that stupid aren't you........the article said hundreds of thousands of people had already voted.......it was published just a day after the debate.....when do YOU think those people voted?.....
Democrats Closing In On Senate Control Even Without Georgia.
- Thread starter martin
- Start date
you ARE that stupid aren't you........the article said hundreds of thousands of people had already voted.......it was published just a day after the debate.....when do YOU think those people voted?.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
shit.......I didn't expect that.......now we can't even count the votes......
did you see my link moron? they didn't know for sure how they broke then, but they do now. nearly a million mail in votes went his way. 200k went to Oz.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
Even with our delegate system, if the states were not "Winner Take All", Hillary would have accumulated more Delegates than Donnie Boy!
I honestly believe when and if the Republicans ever loses two presidential races back to back, They will not like the "Winner Take All" rule anymore.
The stars just hasn't all lined up quite yet for that, BUT IT IS GOING TO HAPPEN- Perhaps even in 2024 the Republicans loose Back-to-back presidential elections.
Last edited:
I do not know if Nate Silver said that Nevada will probably go Democratic in the Senate, but it is possible he said it. And it would make sense.
Laxalt is not favored to win, he is rather in the lead. But that lead has been eroding as more votes are counted. He used have a 2.7% lead, but now it is just a 1% lead. The question is whether his lead of two days ago will be enough to keep him in the lead. This is the question the political analysts are trying to figure out.
In recent elections, Republicans have tended to have a little more of very the late absentee ballots, so I think Laxalt will get Nevada. But that is far from certain. It is very possible Democrats will have 51 seats in the Senate.
ExpressLane
Verified User
Nope it's not breaking your way. The Republicans are going to win.
Cortez Mastro is quickly closer the lead, with many more Democratic heavy ballets still to be counted. Silver is not alone in thinking Cortez Mastro will win.
I know that these political observers have more information than me, but I still think the later absentee votes tend to be more Republican. I still give Cortez Mastro slightly less than even odds of winning. That still means she has a good chance of winning, and an even better chance if I am wrong.
Every reasonable person gives Warnock a better than even chance in Georgia.
So the Senate might be 51 seats Democratic.
I know that these political observers have more information than me, but I still think the later absentee votes tend to be more Republican. I still give Cortez Mastro slightly less than even odds of winning. That still means she has a good chance of winning, and an even better chance if I am wrong.
Every reasonable person gives Warnock a better than even chance in Georgia.
So the Senate might be 51 seats Democratic.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/nevada-senate-race-knife-edge-011838788.html
So far the uncounted votes have broken heavily Democratic, so you are wrong. The question is whether it will continue to break enough Democratic to completely wipe out the lead.
gemini104104
Verified User
Agreed as one of those delicate matters to consider at dealing with these intense elections at also dealing with the affects to which the toxic red enemy from within at war against democracy, society and anything else of a civilized nature on Earth as always. Yet, Nevada and Arizona, in particular, to which the democrat contestant in Nevada has came from being the underdog at catching up with the toxic red wave candidate, and to which I hope Nevada remains blue. I am not worried about Arizona as it appears the blue wave candidate has a strong lead with most votes already counted. Yet, I believe Warnock has a huge chance of defeating the flunky of the red wave of atrocities Walker who isn't fit serve at a pie factory with his type of intellectual deficiency. This would be an addition to the already toxic repub party of treason as a disgrace on the Senate, democracy and the well being of society, its taxpayer money and anything else of a civilized nature. Also a win for the democratic candidate of Nevada would be a win for democracy and its well being and a win for the world renowned Clark County and Washoe County too as the foremost counties of Nevada and where all the revenue exists versus the toxic red desert areas.
Last edited:
gemini104104
Verified User
It appears zealous, treasonous, seditious and insurrectionist repukes set themselves up at falling into tRump's pit of atrocities against America, democracy, society and humanity. This is when it comes to repukes racking up high crime felonious offenses to which they have put themselves in the target aim of U.S. Justice, and it doesn't matter be they sitting in Congress or on the toilet, repukes have a debt they owe to society who they waged war on even against. This includes against their own dumb ass supporters who vote against their own interests at being a liability on society. Additionally, treasonous repukes giving aid, comfort and delight to foreign enemies against America and civilization at laying and selling their dirty hides out to. Therefore, the possibility is there as a extreme justification of the rules and laws of U.S. Justice at dealing with treasonous and evil doing members of the enemy from within.
Last edited:
The forum's three stooges, you, stone and ppm. Your link is dated the day of the election, and if you read it a few times you might have been able to understand this part of it: "Unlike most other states, Pennsylvania's election laws do not permit the pre-canvassing of ballots until 7 a.m. on Election Day, so counties cannot begin counting mail ballots until that time." By the way, states that do count ahead of time do not release the results until after the polls close.
Translated, the candidates didn't know how many votes they received at the time of the debate.
thanks for proving you have no idea how candidates manage campaigns
They had a huge list of their supporters and were in contact. When they bragged about having 600k votes already, it is because they knew
so fuck off. You could learn a ton if you would get of your shit stained high horse and read what people are saying
quickly is you waving pom poms.
This is a nail biter - and the lead remains significant. The logical reading of things right now shows Laxalt stays in front - meaning Georgia is coming back to having all the marbles once again.
Sure, it could change, but I am skeptical. the polling this election has been pretty accurate overall
I have seen some studies of previous elections showing if electors were divided by congressional district instead of winner-take-all there would have been more elections in which the popular vote winner would not have won the electoral college.
Your link and argument regarding it show you're "saying" nonsense but I knew that about you already so nothing to learn.
you are a bore.
It doesn’t say who they voted for!
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
lol, dude.....you've lost this argument and the next six in penalty points....
I have just stated the facts, and my opinion that Laxalt has slightly better than even chances of winning. That is hardly waving pom poms.
798 votes (0.1%) is hardly significant, especially with so many uncounted votes. That is down from 2.7%. The lead has tightened from 2.7% to 0.1%. Just a little tiny bit more, and Laxalt is gone.
The polls could not predict a 0.1% difference.