Democrats Closing In On Senate Control Even Without Georgia.

Laxalt is the Pervert Conservative, so no, the remaining vote doesn't favor him.

“ But there are a lot of real votes left to count in Nevada, and they're mostly from non-Pervert GOP places.”

^ Make up your mind. You just stated the remaining votes are from GOP places. Non-pervert at that. You implied the pervert places are the liberal ones.
 
“ But there are a lot of real votes left to count in Nevada, and they're mostly from non-Pervert GOP places.”

^ Make up your mind. You just stated the remaining votes are from GOP places. Non-pervert at that. You implied the pervert places are the liberal ones.

LMAO!

All GOP are Pervert GOP.

So non-Pervert GOP would mean Democratic.

I wanted to make it clear that the GOP and Conservatives are perverts, each and every one of them.

And the worst part is that you support them pulling down kids' pants so Roy Moore and Rand Paul can get their rocks off.

Why do you support pre-pubescent children being forced to drop their pants in front of perverted Conservatives? I think the kids are owed an answer.
 
“ But there are a lot of real votes left to count in Nevada, and they're mostly from non-Pervert GOP places.”

^ Make up your mind. You just stated the remaining votes are from GOP places. Non-pervert at that. You implied the pervert places are the liberal ones.

No, I implied the liberal places are NOT the perverted ones.

Liberals aren't the ones who support Conservatives pulling down kids' pants to stare at their genitals, you are.
 

LMAO!

Nope. Not a 12b. It's not a 12b violation to say you support Conservatives pulling down kids' pants in order for Roy Moore and Ted Cruz to stare at their nude bodies and jerk off.

I'm not saying YOU are doing it, just that you support the people and policies that do...which is completely accurate and allowed by the rules that Damocles changed in order to protect you.
 
True that.
I’m a liberal.

"Classical Liberal" = Bitchass Fascist Pervert

Classical Liberals are the ones who want to pull down kids' pants in front of Roy Moore so he can stare at their genitals because he's a sicko.

Only a bitchass fascist pervert would support such a policy.
 
If they're not perverts, then they're not Conservatives.

Conservatives = Perverts.
Tell me more about these non-pervert GOP places.
Is that places where non-perverts go to be around Republicans? That’s exactly what it sounds like .
 
Tell me more about these non-pervert GOP places.

Basically, anywhere that is Democratic.

You understand how adjectives work, right?

Or did you never learn what an adjective is because you have a learning disability that has been undiagnosed your entire life?

So in the phrase "non-pervert GOP places", what are the adjectives in that phrase and what is the noun?

Can't believe I have to educate your old ass about basic grammar and English at this point in your life.

Disappointing but not surprising.
 
Is that places where non-perverts go to be around Republicans?

So your attempt at sophistry completely failed here because you're too fucking dumb to know what an adjective is.

So you tried to derail the thread by pretending to be clever about language, but you fucked up there too because you don't know what an adjective is.

You should just give up because at this point, all you're doing is proving to everyone just how fucking insecure you are, pervert.
 
Basically, anywhere that is Democratic.

You understand how adjectives work, right?
I see . So you mean Republican places are democratic societies where non-perverts go to escape gender confused Democrat run violent crime shitholes.
Now I understand.
 
So you mean Republican places are democratic societies where non-perverts go to escape gender confused Democrat run violent crime shitholes.

Democratic areas, including cities, have far lower crime rates than red states and rural areas.

The reason is because all Conservatives care about is stripping kids naked so that pervert GOP can stare at their genitals, and you support that.
 
arq-2ojrd6_t3-jpg.1123990
 
Basically, anywhere that is Democratic.

So then NOT Georgia where Kemp absolutely ROLLED Fat Stacy and Walker has a good chance of Kicking Warnocks ass out too. And dont even attempt saying he doesnt,......they wouldnt even be in a run off if he didnt. So Georgia,....NOT Democratic,....good to know. :cool:
 
LMAO!

Nope. Not a 12b. It's not a 12b violation to say you support Conservatives pulling down kids' pants in order for Roy Moore and Ted Cruz to stare at their nude bodies and jerk off.

I'm not saying YOU are doing it, just that you support the people and policies that do...which is completely accurate and allowed by the rules that Damocles changed in order to protect you.

12B...or A, or C...
12(a) - No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

12(b) - No sexual comments relating to minors. With the exception of news articles or a mature discussion involving stats, how it effects people etc. We especially DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another member and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids of members being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, members being called pedophiles, suggesting members may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

12(c) - Language that is sexually violent (e.g. rape/incest/graphic sex details that simply go 'too far') and/or is used in a manner to harass other users may be removed at moderator discretion without notice or apology, and could end up resulting in a ban if we get tired of repeatedly having to edit posts made by the same individuals over and over.
 
Back
Top