Democrats Approve of Female Supremacy

Like most conservatives, I denounce white supremacy, female supremacy, and basically all forms of "supremacy". Democrats are hypocrites.
 
Like most conservatives, I denounce white supremacy, female supremacy, and basically all forms of "supremacy". Democrats are hypocrites.

The tweets say nothing about supremacy, moron.

She's referring to the future in contrast to the past where it was white, male Christian. Those days are disappearing, pally boy, and that's what the reference is about.

Redstate? lol Lower right quadrant for RW lemmings.

Media-Bias-Chart_Version-3.1_Watermark-min-1024x759.jpg
 
Like most conservatives, I denounce white supremacy, female supremacy, and basically all forms of "supremacy". Democrats are hypocrites.

Mindless.

Democrats don't support white supremacy .. conservatives do. That's why your party is virtually all-white .. and shrinking.

"Hypocrites." :0)
 
The tweets say nothing about supremacy, moron.

She's referring to the future in contrast to the past where it was white, male Christian. Those days are disappearing, pally boy, and that's what the reference is about.

She didn't say they would stop if and when women controlled 50% of political seats. She said "the future is female." Clearly that is a female supremacist statement.
 
She didn't say they would stop if and when women controlled 50% of political seats. She said "the future is female." Clearly that is a female supremacist statement.

They would stop what, you fucking cretin?

Clearly, you're an illiterate shitstain.
 
“The future is female” is a sex supremacist statement essentially saying that the end goal is a place ruled by the female gender. Its defenders would love to say something along the lines of “no, it means the future will finally be equal.” If that was the case, then they would say “the future is equal.” They aren’t. They’re labeling one specific gender as the head of an era.

https://www.redstate.com/brandon_mo...e-supremacist-statement-really-stop-shouting/
 
“The future is female” is a sex supremacist statement essentially saying that the end goal is a place ruled by the female gender. Its defenders would love to say something along the lines of “no, it means the future will finally be equal.” If that was the case, then they would say “the future is equal.” They aren’t. They’re labeling one specific gender as the head of an era.

https://www.redstate.com/brandon_mo...e-supremacist-statement-really-stop-shouting/

Why are you so clueless? Did the doctor slap the wrong end?
 
The tweets say nothing about supremacy, moron.

She's referring to the future in contrast to the past where it was white, male Christian. Those days are disappearing, pally boy, and that's what the reference is about.

Redstate? lol Lower right quadrant for RW lemmings.

Media-Bias-Chart_Version-3.1_Watermark-min-1024x759.jpg

That's strange, all the news agencies in the "neutral" section of that chart are left-leaning. That would give credence to the claim that most news agencies are progressive these days.
 
That's strange, all the news agencies in the "neutral" section of that chart are left-leaning. That would give credence to the claim that most news agencies are progressive these days.

Those ones aren't left leaning. If those are left to you, you must be too far right to tell the difference.
 
That's strange, all the news agencies in the "neutral" section of that chart are left-leaning. That would give credence to the claim that most news agencies are progressive these days.

Sorry, dumbfuck, your opinion, as evidenced by your posts, is worthless.
 
That's strange, all the news agencies in the "neutral" section of that chart are left-leaning. That would give credence to the claim that most news agencies are progressive these days.

And those liberal news agencies are just fine with female supremacy. What hypocrites.
 
Back
Top