You have refuted not a single post I made.
I would take you seriously if you knew what a fascist was.Trump is a fascist who was elected.
You do? Explain it, then.I would take you seriously if you knew what a fascist was.
You don’t.
You do? Explain it, then.
Trump is a fascist who was elected.
Using violence to achieve a political end.You said it.
You explain it.
Using violence to achieve a political end.
Yes. On Jan. 6. Just for one.Trump used violence to achieve a political end?
"The belief that one's group is a victim, sentiment that justifies any action, without legal or moral limits, against its enemies both internal and external."--"The Anatomy of Fascism" by Robert Paxton.You said it.
You explain it.
Yes. On Jan. 6. Just for one.
Nazi type SS officers physically assaulting people on the street.
Already said, Jan 6 attack on the Capitol.I wasn't aware that Trump used violence to achieve a political end?
What "violence" did he supposedly employ, and what "political end" did he allegedly achieve?
"The belief that one's group is a victim, sentiment that justifies any action, without legal or moral limits, against its enemies both internal and external."--"The Anatomy of Fascism" by Robert Paxton.
Already said, Jan 6 attack on the Capitol.
You would be wrong.Mr Paxton's opinion looks to me to be more applicable to the left than it does the POTUS.
Proof that people attacked and beat up 150 cops at the Capitol?!So that's it? No proof?
Proof that people attacked and beat up 150 cops at the Capitol?!
You would be wrong.
Public record. Use your favorite search engine.OIC. You can prove that "Trump "attacked (or caused others to) and beat up 150 cops at the Capitol, and thereby achieved a political end?"
Got of list of these purported casualties?
Prove what? That you have no idea what fascism is?!So you say. Prove it.
Public record. Use your favorite search engine.