Democratic impeachment inquiry blocking important action in Congress

dukkha

Verified User
Consider next the opportunity costs of Congress’ failure to pass a drug pricing reform bill. Democrats and Republicans in the Senate have worked closely together on an issue that matters a great deal to American families: lowering prescription drug prices.
They have crafted a bill (S. 2543) that would significantly improve the Medicare Part D program, hold drug companies far more accountable and save federal taxpayers billions of dollars.

Unfortunately, this transformative bill is not progressing because the House is focusing far more on partisan investigating than bipartisan legislating. Of course, senior citizens are bearing a highly disproportionate share of this particular impeachment burden.

Now how about the lost opportunities associated with the failure to rebuild our decaying roads, bridges, airports and other critical infrastructure? President Trump’s 10-year, $1.5 trillion infrastructure investment program would raise real gross domestic product by as much as 2 percent over the next decade and increase real output by more than $1 trillion, with the higher output recouping some $200 billion in added federal tax revenue.

Meanwhile, Russia and China continue to reshape their militaries in manners that are designed to threaten America’s leadership in space. On a bipartisan basis, the House, Senate and national security experts have agreed that the military must counter these threats.

The United States Space Force, the proposed sixth branch of the armed forces, is an affordable and effective means to protect and defend the nation’s interests in space. Yet Congress is so paralyzed that it may fail to enact a defense authorization bill for the first time in nearly 60 years.

A distracted and divided House has also failed to pass a budget for the 2020 fiscal year. Instead, Congress just keeps kicking the budget can down the road with short-term spending bills known as continuing resolutions.

The American public understands intuitively that the impeachment circus launched by Pelosi and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is not just a partisan witch hunt. It is also a profound waste of time.

Passing USMCA, lowering prescription drug prices, modernizing our infrastructure, launching a Space Force, and tending to the people’s business will lead to more opportunity, more economic growth, and better choices for farmers, workers, families, and communities.

It long past time for the Pelosi-Schiff impeachment circus to slink out of town and let the 116th Congress finally get to work on behalf of the American people.
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/pet...inquiry-blocking-important-action-in-congress

America’s defense-industrial base is being hit particularly hard by congressional addiction to short-term budget fixes. Exhibit A is our nation’s shipbuilding industry.

Shipbuilding is a long lead-time and capital-intensive industry that depends on stable and predictable funding. According to the Shipbuilders Council of America, 94 percent of its members will have to halt hiring if the government continues to operate under a continuing resolution.
 
If Republicans simply vote to impeach, all these things and more are possible, any time.

Vote to impeach and we can move on.

Democrats job has shifted. There is no longer going to be any quick and easy impeachment. If it needs to drag out for months and months, then that is just what has to happen. Democrats would be fools to wrap it up and send it over to the recalcitrant Senate right away. Let it dominate the news cycle throughout the 2020 campaign. I've no problem with that.

America deserves to hear from the key witnesses.

Republicans should be in favor of this as they have been complaining that there is no first hand testimony.

On what grounds does President Trump argue America should not hear from key witnesses at the heart of the matter?
 
If Republicans simply vote to impeach, all these things and more are possible, any time.

Vote to impeach and we can move on.

Democrats job has shifted. There is no longer going to be any quick and easy impeachment. If it needs to drag out for months and months, then that is just what has to happen. Democrats would be fools to wrap it up and send it over to the recalcitrant Senate right away. Let it dominate the news cycle throughout the 2020 campaign. I've no problem with that.

America deserves to hear from the key witnesses.

Republicans should be in favor of this as they have been complaining that there is no first hand testimony.

On what grounds does President Trump argue America should not hear from key witnesses at the heart of the matter?
There is no firsthand testimony, Snowflake, and an impeachment conviction is not going to happen.

So this is a political circus and will be dealt with in 2020 by the American voters. They will determine who is president, not these radical Democrat Socialists in the House.

Meanwhile, no infrastructure legislation...no USMCA legislation...squat from the Democrats to help the working men and women in America.
 
No bribery, no threats, no quid pro quo, nada...no collusion, no obstruction, nada.

Of course Biden and son...
 
Solution simple, Republicans get some balls and integrity and tell your fat butt ugly pock marked criminal traitor thief clown lying rapist
tax evading scum loser to get the fuck out of the white house.

Yu can't you won't you have NO balls or INTEGRITY and so you can STFU about the house.
 
No bribery, no threats, no quid pro quo, nada...no collusion, no obstruction, nada.

Of course Biden and son...
 
If Republicans simply vote to impeach, all these things and more are possible, any time.

Vote to impeach and we can move on.

Democrats job has shifted. There is no longer going to be any quick and easy impeachment. If it needs to drag out for months and months, then that is just what has to happen. Democrats would be fools to wrap it up and send it over to the recalcitrant Senate right away. Let it dominate the news cycle throughout the 2020 campaign. I've no problem with that.

America deserves to hear from the key witnesses.

Republicans should be in favor of this as they have been complaining that there is no first hand testimony.

On what grounds does President Trump argue America should not hear from key witnesses at the heart of the matter?

Executive privilege is clearly defined in the constitution.

On what legal grounds is Schiff hiding the WB?
 
Solution simple, Republicans get some balls and integrity and tell your fat butt ugly pock marked criminal traitor thief clown lying rapist
tax evading scum loser to get the fuck out of the white house.

Yu can't you won't you have NO balls or INTEGRITY and so you can STFU about the house.

Why don’t democrats find some brain cells and vote for censure lol?
 
If Republicans simply vote to impeach, all these things and more are possible, any time.

Vote to impeach and we can move on.

Democrats job has shifted. There is no longer going to be any quick and easy impeachment. If it needs to drag out for months and months, then that is just what has to happen. Democrats would be fools to wrap it up and send it over to the recalcitrant Senate right away. Let it dominate the news cycle throughout the 2020 campaign. I've no problem with that.

America deserves to hear from the key witnesses.

Republicans should be in favor of this as they have been complaining that there is no first hand testimony.

On what grounds does President Trump argue America should not hear from key witnesses at the heart of the matter?

Gee where have I heard something similar?

Vote to impeach and we can move on.

Makes one think of the Democrat wall stand off that shut the government down.
 
Hello Darth,

Executive privilege is clearly defined in the constitution.

On what legal grounds is Schiff hiding the WB?

Executive privilege should not extend to noncompliance with an impeachment. No one is above the law.

The WB is being protected for obvious reasons. Trump has publicly talked about calling the WB a traitor and mentioning that traitors are executed. Many Trump fans have expressed very negative intentions toward the WB. The WB's life would be in jeopardy if his or her identity is revealed.
 
We need to hear from the key witnesses.

It is incongruous for the President to claim there are no key witnesses testifying when he prevents it. That is the President acting above the law.
 
Hello Darth,



Executive privilege should not extend to noncompliance with an impeachment. No one is above the law.

The WB is being protected for obvious reasons. Trump has publicly talked about calling the WB a traitor and mentioning that traitors are executed. Many Trump fans have expressed very negative intentions toward the WB. The WB's life would be in jeopardy if his or her identity is revealed.

But Schiff has no legal grounds from which to protect the WB?

Btw, there are any number of anti-Trumpers running around wild and free—a few of them got jobs on CNN after leaving government so that’s a weak excuse.

And why did Schiff lie about the WB having a statutory right to remain anonymous?
 
Executive privilege is clearly defined in the constitution.

On what legal grounds is Schiff hiding the WB?

Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012

https://www.sec.gov/eeoinfo/whistleblowers.htm

We are all quite aware of the threats your Tantrum King has made against the WB in this case. Schiff could be liable for various sanctions/penalties for disclosing his/her identity which would inevitably lead to retaliation by your tweeting fool of a POTUS.
 
Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012

https://www.sec.gov/eeoinfo/whistleblowers.htm

We are all quite aware of the threats your Tantrum King has made against the WB in this case. Schiff could be liable for various sanctions/penalties for disclosing his/her identity which would inevitably lead to retaliation by your tweeting fool of a POTUS.

I missed the part where the statute guarantees anonymity of the WB.
 
Hello Darth,

But Schiff has no legal grounds from which to protect the WB?

Btw, there are any number of anti-Trumpers running around wild and free—a few of them got jobs on CNN after leaving government so that’s a weak excuse.

And why did Schiff lie about the WB having a statutory right to remain anonymous?

If there were any beef to that nothing-burger of an argument, then Trump would have forced the WB identity to be revealed already.

And what would be the point if identifying the individual? Retribution?
 
Back
Top