Democrat-dominated CA can't supply water

B

Big Money

New member
_72692383_020823108-1.jpg




California's water agency has announced it may for the first time be unable to deliver water to local agencies, amid a worsening drought.


Two-thirds of state residents and 1m acres of farmland get part or all of their drinking and irrigation supplies from the agency.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-25996522
 
A blue state in dire need of water?!? I don't get it. I JUST DON'T GET IT!!!

Perhaps the border patrol should require each illegal Mexican to have at least one gallon of water before they enter the country.
 
Last edited:
Granule said:
A blue state in dire need of water?!? I don't get it. I JUST DON'T GET IT!!!

Perhaps the border patrol should require each illegal Mexican to have at least one gallon of water before they enter the country.
Click to expand...

Yep, Jesus is withholding water till you legalize marijuana, look at how well Colorado and Washington are doing!

Colorado had a drought, too, they legalized pokalolo and got a lot of snow! which turns into water!
 
Last edited:
Gov. Moonbeam finally woke up out of his stupor, we have had low rain levels for a few years and all of a sudden he just realized it. Its no wonder we are in a drought, liberals are the biggest abusers, they talk the talk but when it comes down to action, its everyman for himself.
 
Sardonic said:
Yep, Jesus is withholding water till you legslize marijuana, look at how well Colorado and Washington are doing!

Colorado had a drought, too, they legalized pokalolo and got a lot of snow! which turns into water!
Click to expand...
Pfft. Show's what you know. The Lord's just making an example out of that hellhole. Washington and Colorado are on borrowed time, that is all. ;)
 
California has had huge water problems since the '30s (at least) and the whole world is facing a water crisis within the next 5 years. Don't tell Tom though, or he'll have something else to be on about.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
It's called "dog whistle" politics, look it up.
Click to expand...


Like this?


During the 2008 Democratic primaries, several writers criticized Hillary Clinton's campaign's reliance on code words and innuendo seemingly designed to frame Barack Obama's race as problematic, saying Obama was characterized by the Clinton campaign and its prominent supporters as anti-white due to his association with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, as only able to get black votes, as anti-patriotic, a drug user, possibly a drug seller, and married to an angry, ungrateful black woman



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog-whistle_politics
 
Big Money said:
Like this?
During the 2008 Democratic primaries, several writers criticized Hillary Clinton's campaign's reliance on code words and innuendo seemingly designed to frame Barack Obama's race as problematic, saying Obama was characterized by the Clinton campaign and its prominent supporters as anti-white due to his association with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, as only able to get black votes, as anti-patriotic, a drug user, possibly a drug seller, and married to an angry, ungrateful black woman



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog-whistle_politics
Click to expand...

Yes, it's a mildly effective political strategy. Create word associations and use innuendo to portray viewpoints you'd rather not just come out and say, or are too scared to.

Any particular reason why you chose that snippet?
 
No, it is. So is this:

You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968, you can't say "nigger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger." - Lee Atwater former Republican strategist on the "southern strategy"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top