Deescalation

Quit pretending to don’t constantly make silly excuses for all the evil that is trying to destroy American democracy

It’s blatant

Want to convince us otherwise?

Stop defending lies
 
Damocles said:
He was doing what people who sit behind cameras tell him to do. The false equivalence of "going to a protest" with Rittenhouse is interesting to me.... He was there to protect people against the "mostly peaceful" protesters who were burning and damaging property and attacking people, he did not "go to a protest with a gun", he volunteered to protect some private property from damage.

Now, those idiots who open carried at an Obama speech... Those ones "showed up at a protest with a gun"... somewhat equivalent. Nobody was kicking out the lights on vehicles, blocking his road, blowing whistles at the cops, trying to make them unable to arrest child traffickers and rapists by having police refuse to work with Federal Law Enforcement causing them to have to "raid" houses, etc. and to send enough agents to provide their own security to boot... but at least those guys showed up "to a protest" open carrying.
Click to expand...
Impressive that you can talk with TACO's micro dick lodged in your throat
 
T. A. Gardner said:
He didn't have to. Having it on his person is possession. If one officer saw the gun as they struggled with Pretti, who was RESISTING ARREST, and that officer started yelling "Gun!" then the other officers present would take that to mean Pretti had a gun and was a lethal threat. That one other officer, who likely couldn't in the confusion of the moment, see that gun clearly or where it was and decided to use lethal force then he was justified in doing so because as far as he knew Pretti had a gun and was a threat AS PRETTI CONTINUED TO RESIST ARREST AND FIGHT VIOLENTLY WITH THE OTHER OFFICERS.
Click to expand...
What about after Pretti was dead and they kept shooting his corpse, dumb fuck?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top