December 19, ANOTHER day that may live in infamy ...

sear

serene
Donald Trump has not yet won the election.

The electoral college is scheduled to meet on Dec. 19.

The Founders intended the electoral college to provide a buffer against a demigod obtaining U.S. presidential office.

One suggestion:
The electoral college electors should sidestep the disaster of a Trump administration, and instead vote for some other candidate; former Republican presidential candidate John Kasich for example.

If you were a voting member of the electoral college, what would you do?
 
Kasich may be bad.

Is Trump any better?

One Minuteman U.S. ICBM has more explosive power than all the munitions used by all sides in WWII; Allies, Axis, including the nukes dropped on Japan; combined.

And we're jamming this guy's trigger finger on "THE BUTTON" of WWII times holy cow?! Commander in Chief of the entire U.S. military arsenal?

- uh oh -
 
"Join Team Bucky

Nobody has yet" DW #11
You're welcome to translate this. I don't understand the intended meaning. But I can rule out "Bucky" = Trump
as he's already got several members on his team, including Pence and
"When this fails, you will cry IMPEACHMENT every other day

You are traitors to this country"
I don't recall having considered impeachment since the Nixon administration. In any case, I'm singular, not plural. I know of no one less a traitor than I am.
 
Kasich may be bad.

Is Trump any better?

One Minuteman U.S. ICBM has more explosive power than all the munitions used by all sides in WWII; Allies, Axis, including the nukes dropped on Japan; combined.

And we're jamming this guy's trigger finger on "THE BUTTON" of WWII times holy cow?! Commander in Chief of the entire U.S. military arsenal?

- uh oh -
Yeh, you said that before and it was bullshit then as well!!

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
#13
You're welcome to post a facsimile of his al Qaida membership card.

And you get bonus points for posting proof a Kasich administration would be more detrimental to the United States of America than a Trump administration.
 
Donald Trump has not yet won the election.

The electoral college is scheduled to meet on Dec. 19.

The Founders intended the electoral college to provide a buffer against a demigod obtaining U.S. presidential office.

One suggestion:
The electoral college electors should sidestep the disaster of a Trump administration, and instead vote for some other candidate; former Republican presidential candidate John Kasich for example.

If you were a voting member of the electoral college, what would you do?

I have jury service that week. coincidence or conspiracy?

I believe female Electors should get more Collegiate in their deliberation of stated public policy goals by the right.
 
I have jury service that week. coincidence or conspiracy? dp #16
If you have never pledged your allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, you can serve as juror w/ clean conscience.

BUT !!

If you have, then an ethical person couldn't.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
After the defense rests, but before deliberations, the judge "charges" the jury; issues instructions on how to deliberate; what "reasonable doubt" means, etc.

And generally U.S. law judges do not endorse jury nullification; meaning juries refusing to enforce the letter of the law if to do so would result in an injustice.

Jurors take an oath of fidelity to law, before they deliberate.

BUT !!

The pledge of allegiance is a prior obligation.
What's the difference between a "pledge" and an "oath"?
pledge (plèj) noun
A solemn binding promise *

88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888

oath (oth) noun
plural oaths (othz, oths)
A solemn, formal declaration or promise *
Not only would I be willing to disclose this potential conflict to the law judge. I have done so, disemploying myself in the process.

I don't know what the statistically quantified risk is that there'd be a conflict between these two potentially contradictory binding promises. But who can guarantee that there won't be one.

If United States governments want jurors to fulfill their citizenship duties as charged by law judges, then they should stop coercing U.S. children from taking this pledge.

Until they do; citizens that have taken the pledge have a "binding" prior commitment.

* Excerpted from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition © 1996 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from INSO Corporation; further reproduction and distribution in accordance with the Copyright Law of the United States. All rights reserved.
 
Back
Top