DEAD

Howey

Banned
Keep repeating to yourselves:

There's no such thing as global warming.

There's no such thing as global warming.

There's no such thing as global warming.

There's no such thing as global warming.

There's no such thing as global warming.

There's no such thing as global warming.

There's no such thing as global warming.

There's no such thing as global warming...






aYw2eKe.jpg



A starved polar bear found found dead in Svalbard as "little more than skin and bones" perished due to a lack of sea ice on which to hunt seals, according to a renowned polar bear expert.

Climate change has reduced sea ice in the Arctic to record lows in the last year and Dr Ian Stirling, who has studied the bears for almost 40 years and examined the animal, said the lack of ice forced the bear into ranging far and wide in an ultimately unsuccessful search for food.

"From his lying position in death the bear appears to simply have starved and died where he dropped," Stirling said. "He had no external suggestion of any remaining fat, having been reduced to little more than skin and bone."

The bear had been examined by scientists from the Norwegian Polar Institute in April in the southern part of Svalbard, an Arctic island archipelago, and appeared healthy. The same bear had been captured in the same area in previous years, suggesting that the discovery of its body, 250km away in northern Svalbard in July, represented an unusual movement away from its normal range. The bear probably followed the fjords inland as it trekked north, meaning it may have walked double or treble that distance.

Polar bears feed almost exclusively on seals and need sea ice to capture their prey. But 2012 saw the lowest level of sea ice in the Arctic on record. Prond Robertson, at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute, said: "The sea ice break up around Svalbard in 2013 was both fast and very early." He said recent years had been poor for ice around the islands: "Warm water entered the western fjords in 2005-06 and since then has not shifted."
 
Sucks, especially for polar bears.

But, there ain't a heck of a lot that can be done about it. The report that came out last week mainly recommended that we get ready for the changes & be adaptable to them.
 
LOL

They find a dead bear and automatically it's because global warming. No evidence. Polar bears never die unless global warming gets them.

This is what the alamists really believe.
 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.489/abstract

As if you warmers will read the link.

You really should be aware that your talking point has been debunked. Polar bears thrive in the warming areas.

Of course I read it. Particularly this:

...Harp seal abundance was significantly related to polar bear survival. Our estimates of declining harvest recovery rate, and increasing total survival, suggest that the rate of harvest declined over time. Low recruitment rates, average adult survival rates, and high population density, in an environment of high prey density, but deteriorating and variable ice conditions, currently characterize the Davis Strait polar bears. Low reproductive rates may reflect negative effects of greater densities or worsening ice conditions

More from The Wildlife Society, author of the book you supposedly cite:

http://news.wildlife.org/blog/should-zoos-try-to-save-the-polar-bear/

Arctic sea ice—critical habitat of the polar bear—once persisted throughout the summer months, but rising global temperatures are expected to eliminate summer sea ice by 2030. As a result, polar bears are increasingly restricted to ice over land and deep ocean water, where they have trouble finding enough food. Concerned that polar bears may disappear from the wild, zoos hope to build captive populations in order to one day replenish wild populations.

http://www.wcs.org/news-and-feature...-wildlife-conservation-society-scientist.aspx

Typically at this time of year, polar bears spend their days hunting seals on sea ice, but recent warming has caused the ice to recede miles from shore. In fact, the bears have been trapped on land in Arctic Alaska all spring and summer, unable to swim out to sea ice. Their condition is unknown.

“It is ironic that our efforts to understand how climate change is affecting wildlife were disrupted by the top Arctic predator displaced by climate,” said Dr. Steve Zack of WCS. He and conservation scientist Joe Liebezeit, who together lead the Arctic studies for WCS, will continue their work on shorebirds in the Prudhoe Bay region this season.

And, finally, this from their very own blog, proving what a dimwitted numbskull ill-informed and totally stupid doofus you truly are. THIS IS ABOUT THE SAME DEAD POLAR BEAR.

http://blog.nwf.org/2013/08/starved...er&utm_content=bufferf855c&utm_medium=twitter


Photos that shock and horrify, and make your heart sink? If yes, we’ve got one for you: a starved polar bear found dead in Svalbard, who “looked basically like a rug,” according to the photographer.

That photo can now go into the memory bank along with the picture of the starved puffin chicks off the New England coast. Or of the moose calves that were consumed by record number of ticks, which their weak systems couldn’t fend off.

I am not writing this for sensational reasons. I am writing this because I am angry and saddened, and hope that it will propel you and your friends, neighbors, and co-workers to become active in tackling the climate crisis.

...


Take the next step and become more politically involved. Vote for people (at all levels of government) who see the opportunities in investing in renewable energy, who don’t deny climate change. Support federal actions to cut carbon pollution from power plants, the largest source in the U.S. Stand with your neighbors who are saying “yes” to wind turbines off the Atlantic Coast; and saying “no” to coal barges off the Pacific Ocean that threaten endangered orcas, and “no” to tar sands that threaten the endangered whooping crane.

Let’s band together and stop treating climate change as a nuisance. We have a severe problem on our hands, and those who don’t have a voice are experiencing it firsthand.

- See more at: http://blog.nwf.org/2013/08/starved...f855c&utm_medium=twitter#sthash.Kn1rDPtD.dpuf


DEAR TINFOIL,

THE ABOVE WILL PUT YOU FIRMLY IN THE TOP TIER OF JPP'ERS BEING TOTALLY AND FIRMLY PWN'D BY MOI.
YOU ARE WITHOUT A DOUBT ONE OF THE STUPIDEST AND IGNORANT POSTERS ON THIS FORUM. CONGRATULATIONS. FOOL.
 
Of course I read it. Particularly this:



More from The Wildlife Society, author of the book you supposedly cite:

http://news.wildlife.org/blog/should-zoos-try-to-save-the-polar-bear/



http://www.wcs.org/news-and-feature...-wildlife-conservation-society-scientist.aspx



And, finally, this from their very own blog, proving what a dimwitted numbskull ill-informed and totally stupid doofus you truly are. THIS IS ABOUT THE SAME DEAD POLAR BEAR.

http://blog.nwf.org/2013/08/starved...er&utm_content=bufferf855c&utm_medium=twitter




- See more at: http://blog.nwf.org/2013/08/starved...f855c&utm_medium=twitter#sthash.Kn1rDPtD.dpuf


DEAR TINFOIL,

THE ABOVE WILL PUT YOU FIRMLY IN THE TOP TIER OF JPP'ERS BEING TOTALLY AND FIRMLY PWN'D BY MOI.
YOU ARE WITHOUT A DOUBT ONE OF THE STUPIDEST AND IGNORANT POSTERS ON THIS FORUM. CONGRATULATIONS. FOOL.

Tinfoil is right. Finding a single bear dead is not evidence of anything more than a single deceased animal.

Thank you. You have joined Tinfoil in the JPP Hall of Fame of Stupidity.

wBHZNO6.jpg
 
Tinfoil is right. Finding a single bear dead is not evidence of anything more than a single deceased animal.

It's not just the dead bear, of course. It's all the other signs that polar bears are suffering from global climate change (see Howey's post). A dead bear just puts it in terms we can empathize with.
 
You fool, Howey. The study determined they could not discern between decline due to environment from decline due to population reaching its limit.

Low reproductive rates may reflect negative effects of greater densities or worsening ice conditions


They can't say it was caused by environment any more than they can say it was from population dynamics
 
Howey really doesn't understand science. You have to show that every other factor is not to blame if you wish to blame a certain factor.
 
It's not just the dead bear, of course. It's all the other signs that polar bears are suffering from global climate change (see Howey's post). A dead bear just puts it in terms we can empathize with.

please cite a peer reviewed study showing a decline in polar bear population in conjuction with warming environment. Go ahead. I challenge you
 
Is this the way you debate on your website? Or do you reserve such uncivilized behavior for our little slice of heaven?

No. We don't have idiots on my forum. Well, one -boh, but he's there for comedy relief.

please cite a peer reviewed study showing a decline in polar bear population in conjuction with warming environment. Go ahead. I challenge you

You dumb fuck. The Wildlife Society is the premiere peer review group. Read my links.

Tawdry. Did your parents have any children that lived?
 
Howey really doesn't understand science. You have to show that every other factor is not to blame if you wish to blame a certain factor.

Unfortunately, it's really hard to hold a double-blind study on global climate change vs other factors, since we have only one planet.

Tinfoil suggests the population might be meeting its limit- but would that limit be higher if the sea ice wasn't melting due to global climate change?

http://www.polarbearsinternational.org/about-polar-bears/essentials/climate-change
At the March 2009 range states meeting of the five polar bear nations, scientists agreed that climate change is the single biggest threat facing polar bears.


http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/09-1641.1
Climate change threatens polar bear populations: a stochastic demographic analysis

The polar bear (Ursus maritimus) depends on sea ice for feeding, breeding, and movement. Significant reductions in Arctic sea ice are forecast to continue because of climate warming. We evaluated the impacts of climate change on polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea by means of a demographic analysis, combining deterministic, stochastic, environment-dependent matrix population models with forecasts of future sea ice conditions from IPCC general circulation models (GCMs). The matrix population models classified individuals by age and breeding status; mothers and dependent cubs were treated as units. Parameter estimates were obtained from a capture–recapture study conducted from 2001 to 2006. Candidate statistical models allowed vital rates to vary with time and as functions of a sea ice covariate. Model averaging was used to produce the vital rate estimates, and a parametric bootstrap procedure was used to quantify model selection and parameter estimation uncertainty. Deterministic models projected population growth in years with more extensive ice coverage (2001–2003) and population decline in years with less ice coverage (2004–2005). LTRE (life table response experiment) analysis showed that the reduction in λ in years with low sea ice was due primarily to reduced adult female survival, and secondarily to reduced breeding. A stochastic model with two environmental states, good and poor sea ice conditions, projected a declining stochastic growth rate, log λs, as the frequency of poor ice years increased. The observed frequency of poor ice years since 1979 would imply log λs ≈ − 0.01, which agrees with available (albeit crude) observations of population size. The stochastic model was linked to a set of 10 GCMs compiled by the IPCC; the models were chosen for their ability to reproduce historical observations of sea ice and were forced with “business as usual” (A1B) greenhouse gas emissions. The resulting stochastic population projections showed drastic declines in the polar bear population by the end of the 21st century. These projections were instrumental in the decision to list the polar bear as a threatened species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.


Right now we're playing russian roulette with the only planet we have. Dumb of us.
 
LOL

They find a dead bear and automatically it's because global warming. No evidence. Polar bears never die unless global warming gets them.

This is what the alamists really believe.


tinearedfool,


dude are you really saying there is a lack of evidence?


Um 97 % of the experts say man effects global warming due to the scientific evidence.

YOUR the ones who choose like 1% of the experts to deny 97% of the experts.


Your a real 1 percenter guy huh
 
tinearedfool,


dude are you really saying there is a lack of evidence?


Um 97 % of the experts say man effects global warming due to the scientific evidence.

YOUR the ones who choose like 1% of the experts to deny 97% of the experts.


Your a real 1 percenter guy huh

Little twit .. I left a message for you on your Nazi flag thread.
 
Back
Top