Data skewing 101 or James Hansen's magic touch

tinfoil

Banned
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/01/global_warmmongering_more_silk.html

2ic1yj8.jpg

Jimmy boy is at it again. Doesn't he know we're watching him?

Here's Jimmy's big mistake. He's smart. He should know others are smart too. Why does he insult our inteligence?
 
holy crap, not a peep from watermark? This must be a tough one to knock.
Tell me you get the point I'm making about Hansen and the underlying premise of anthropogenic warming.
 
Manmade emissions cause global warming.

Consensus.

You're right about global warming being manmade...Hansen creates it. Well for 2008 he tried. They fudged their numbers and then said it was a mistake and and that, of all excuses, they didn't have the FUNDING to CHECK ALL THE DATA.

Can you imagine that? The world's top climate scientists not having enough funding. That's ridiculous. NASA GISS has an enormous budget. Data collection and verification is job one. If it's not, you have to question Hansen's methods even if you're the biggest warmer out there. Come fricken on! How do you trust this guy? Seriously, can you answer that simple question? Does anything you find out about Hansen's trickery cause you to doubt anything AGW?


If you follow the link above the trend lines are shown.
You guys often discount short term trends, like the last decade, for example, and then other times you us a short term trend to make your case, for example, the previous decade, the 90's.

Which is it? just kidding, I know you have no clue. It should be obvious to you by now that I have taken the time to understand the arguments. That's why you simply avoid the conversation. You know you don't really know. So you should also realize you're praticing faith which equals religion. It's too bad you can't be reasoned with. Hansen is the source of your belief. If your faith isn't shaken by this, you're no better than some idiot who sends money to a crooked TV evangelist.

LOL
 
Back
Top