Daily Challenge for the Left

[Getin the ring]

The bolded is just like your mindless thread earlier.

Why would any partisan democrat be privy to that information?

you have no argument do you.
I know you are in your moms basement on her computer, so while you are there, google wikileaks.
You will see page one that if they had something on Trump they would have plastered it all over the net.

Unless your conspiracy theory is that they are on trumps side so like in the DNC hacks they only exposed the Democrats.
Which wouldn't surprise me that was your stance. Watch the Wizard of Oz again and pay attention carefully, the backdrops are fake, there is no real OZ, and monkeys don't fly.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Who knows? Are we in the FBI - are we privy to what the investigation is uncovering?
.

yeah.....you, me, the FBI.....we all know nothing was uncovered......

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

you have no argument do you.
I know you are in your moms basement on her computer, so while you are there, google wikileaks.
You will see page one that if they had something on Trump they would have plastered it all over the net.

Unless your conspiracy theory is that they are on trumps side so like in the DNC hacks they only exposed the Democrats.
Which wouldn't surprise me that was your stance. Watch the Wizard of Oz again and pay attention carefully, the backdrops are fake, there is no real OZ, and monkeys don't fly.

Why would Wikileaks definitely have something on Trump?

You're basing your whole argument on the assumption that they've hacked everything and represent a comprehensive database.

 

[Airstrip One]

The bolded is just like your mindless thread earlier.

Why would any partisan democrat be privy to that information?

Because they're colluding with Russia.

 

[Evmetro]

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...-alarms/ar-BBAYRJi?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp



heres two you fucking shit head

You just provided two links, not an actual name as the opening post asks for. All it asks for is one single name, and you have not provided that. Do you not have a name to provide, or are you simply too incompetent to follow directions?

 

[Evmetro]

What a stupid thread.

Who knows? Are we in the FBI - are we privy to what the investigation is uncovering?

Get over it, already. You guys really are soft when one of your own is getting scrutinized.

Do you not have a name to post here as the opening post requests, or are you too incompetent to follow directions?

 

[Evmetro]

the fact is they NEVER listen to reality

I am listening, where's the name and substantiating evidence?

 

[Evmetro]

the OP asks for proof of collusion and you post a link about Russian photgraphers,

are you really this stupid?

Do you not have a name to post here as the opening post requests, or are you too incompetent to follow directions?

 

[Evmetro]

what I am privy to is common sense,
With all the lack of secrecy, the leaks, etc if there was even one tiny little hint of collusion between Trump and Russia in the election it would plastered all over the news. Do you not think for one minute the same hackers that exposed Hillary and her crooks would have proof Trump was involved with the Russians, and expose that to further throw our democracy into a tailspin?

Do you think at all?

Exactly!