Daily Challenge for the Left

[canceled.2021.1]

All I have been hearing since Hillary was embarrassed is that Trump collided with "the Russians" to sabotage Hillary

Now I notice that why are very vague and say "the Russians"

My challenge is this.

Give me one single solitary name of someone in Russia that Trump colluded with

Just one single name.

 

[evince]

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...-alarms/ar-BBAYRJi?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp



heres two you fucking shit head

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

What a stupid thread.

Who knows? Are we in the FBI - are we privy to what the investigation is uncovering?

Get over it, already. You guys really are soft when one of your own is getting scrutinized.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

You ask shite like this all the time. It's such linear, simplistic thinking.

Seriously - grow up.

 

[evince]

and then ignores the valid answers given him


hes listening to the right wing news who pretends the left never answers questions


the fact is they NEVER listen to reality

 

[Getin the ring]

What a stupid thread.

Who knows? Are we in the FBI - are we privy to what the investigation is uncovering?

Get over it, already. You guys really are soft when one of your own is getting scrutinized.

perfect ^^^^^

they have no friggin idea, it's a witch hunt and they hope the golden egg hits them in their pointy little heads out of nowhere

 

[Micawber]

All I have been hearing since Hillary was embarrassed is that Trump collided with "the Russians" to sabotage Hillary

Now I notice that why are very vague and say "the Russians"

My challenge is this.

Give me one single solitary name of someone in Russia that Trump colluded with

Just one single name.

Ivan

 

[Getin the ring]

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...-alarms/ar-BBAYRJi?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp



heres two you fucking shit head

the OP asks for proof of collusion and you post a link about Russian photgraphers,

are you really this stupid?

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

perfect ^^^^^

they have no friggin idea, it's a witch hunt and they hope the golden egg hits them in their pointy little heads out of nowhere

You have no more idea on that than I do about who the exact Russians might be.

Why are you so certain? You know more than our intel community...than the FBI? What are you privy to?

 

[Getin the ring]

You have no more idea on that than I do about who the exact Russians might be.

Why are you so certain? You know more than our intel community...than the FBI? What are you privy to?

what I am privy to is common sense,
With all the lack of secrecy, the leaks, etc if there was even one tiny little hint of collusion between Trump and Russia in the election it would plastered all over the news. Do you not think for one minute the same hackers that exposed Hillary and her crooks would have proof Trump was involved with the Russians, and expose that to further throw our democracy into a tailspin?

Do you think at all?

 

[evince]

that would mean the Russians have to implicate themselves idiot

 

[evince]

perfect ^^^^^

they have no friggin idea, it's a witch hunt and they hope the golden egg hits them in their pointy little heads out of nowhere

17 of the USA intel groups are lying ?


state your evidence that they are lying assdrip

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

what I am privy to is common sense,
With all the lack of secrecy, the leaks, etc if there was even one tiny little hint of collusion between Trump and Russia in the election it would plastered all over the news. Do you not think for one minute the same hackers that exposed Hillary and her crooks would have proof Trump was involved with the Russians, and expose that to further throw our democracy into a tailspin?

Do you think at all?

The logic of the above is really outstanding. Absolutely nothing is secret anymore, because hackers expose everything.

No more investigations needed. It's all just out there.

 

[evince]

17 of the USA intel groups are lying ?


state your evidence that they are lying assdrip

but why are you not answering


I cant imagine why

 

[domer76]

All I have been hearing since Hillary was embarrassed is that Trump collided with "the Russians" to sabotage Hillary

Now I notice that why are very vague and say "the Russians"

My challenge is this.

Give me one single solitary name of someone in Russia that Trump colluded with

Just one single name.

There are meds for people like you who hear things that aren't there.

 

[Getin the ring]

The logic of the above is really outstanding. Absolutely nothing is secret anymore, because hackers expose everything.

No more investigations needed. It's all just out there.

I know you are thick as a brick, but I'll give this a try.
My point was that will all of the leaks, resources spent, etc. to try and tie the Trump campaign to Russia's involvement in the 2016 election, does it not seem a little odd
that not one single piece of evidence has come out to support such a claim. Not from Wikileaks, not from Russian sources, not from our medias and all of their leaking mouthpieces scouring the bushes
like vultures looking for food.

Sit back and think, brickhead aside.. because you are embarrassing yourself at this point

 

[Celticguy]

No answers. Shocking...

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

I know you are thick as a brick, but I'll give this a try.
My point was that will all of the leaks, resources spent, etc. to try and tie the Trump campaign to Russia's involvement in the 2016 election, does it not seem a little odd
that not one single piece of evidence has come out to support such a claim. Not from Wikileaks, not from Russian sources, not from our medias and all of their leaking mouthpieces scouring the bushes
like vultures looking for food.

Sit back and think, brickhead aside.. because you are embarrassing yourself at this point

Your whole schtick is so outdated. You sound like how people used to post when message boards first came out: "are you on mommy's computer? You're embarrassing yourself," etc.

It's the sign of a weak argument. And yours is. We can dismiss any investigation using that "oh, hackers would have found something if it was there" logic. Inane.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Your whole schtick is so outdated. You sound like how people used to post when message boards first came out: "are you on mommy's computer? You're embarrassing yourself," etc.

It's the sign of a weak argument. And yours is. We can dismiss any investigation using that "oh, hackers would have found something if it was there" logic. Inane.

Let me perfectly clear. Here is why I believe there is nothing there.

1) when pressed every single partisan democrat had admitted zero evidence

2) if there were a single solitary shred of evidence implicating Trump in collusion with the Russkies it would have been leaked to The NY Times by now

If you honestly don't believe that then you ar either stupid or being deliberately obtuse.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Let me perfectly clear. Here is why I believe there is nothing there.

1) when pressed every single partisan democrat had admitted zero evidence

2) if there were a single solitary shred of evidence implicating Trump in collusion with the Russkies it would have been leaked to The NY Times by now

If you honestly don't believe that then you ar either stupid or being deliberately obtuse.

The bolded is just like your mindless thread earlier.

Why would any partisan democrat be privy to that information?