Cuba Offers to Pay Reparations

Where the fuck is a country we have kept in poverty for generations going to get that kind of money.? This is very likely a BS thread.
The nice thing about a communist government is that they have a lot of assets. Theres a lot of Luxury hotels in tourist areas that the government owns for example. Those can be privatized and sold off or shares can be given to Miami Cubans in proportion to their claims. Cuba also has some oil and copper I think. Not a lot but you can get money from there too.

You just have to be a bit creative but theres money there if you want it.
 
Yes — Cuba has recently signaled willingness to negotiate compensation (“reparations”) for U.S. citizens and companies whose property was nationalized after the 1959 Revolution. This is exactly what the article in your open tab is discussing.

But the story is more nuanced, and it helps to understand the legal and diplomatic context.

🧩 What Cuba Is Actually Offering​

According to the page you’re reading, a Cuban deputy foreign minister told Drop Site News that:
  • Cuba is prepared to negotiate a lump‑sum compensation package
  • The initial figure mentioned is $9 billion
  • The offer is aimed at resolving claims from Americans whose property was seized after 1959
This aligns with long‑standing Cuban policy:Cuba has always said it is willing to compensate claimants — but only as part of a broader normalization agreement with the U.S. (which has never been reached).

🏛️ Historical Context​


These are mostly corporations (e.g., Exxon, Coca‑Cola, ITT) and wealthy individuals whose assets were nationalized.

Spain, Canada, Switzerland, and the U.K. all reached settlement agreements with Cuba in the 1960s–1980s.

Because the embargo and diplomatic freeze made negotiations impossible.

🔍 What’s New Here?​

The article you’re reading suggests Cuba is now willing to:
  • Put a specific dollar figure on the table
  • Engage in direct negotiations
  • Frame it as part of a broader reconciliation effort
That’s a meaningful shift in tone, even if not yet a formal agreement.

🧱 What’s​

Cuba’s offer does not imply:
  • Reparations for mob‑owned casinos (as the forum thread jokes about)
  • Compensation for people whose ownership was never legally documented
  • Any admission of wrongdoing beyond the nationalization itself
The Cuban government’s position has always been:Nationalization was legal under international law, but compensation is owed.

🧭 Where This Could Go​

Whether anything happens depends on:
  • U.S.–Cuba diplomatic relations
  • The U.S. political climate
  • Whether both sides can agree on a valuation method
  • Whether the U.S. lifts or modifies parts of the embargo
Historically, these negotiations stall because each side wants concessions the other won’t give.
 
Yes — Cuba has recently signaled willingness to negotiate compensation (“reparations”) for U.S. citizens and companies whose property was nationalized after the 1959 Revolution. This is exactly what the article in your open tab is discussing.

But the story is more nuanced, and it helps to understand the legal and diplomatic context.

🧩 What Cuba Is Actually Offering​

According to the page you’re reading, a Cuban deputy foreign minister told Drop Site News that:
  • Cuba is prepared to negotiate a lump‑sum compensation package
  • The initial figure mentioned is $9 billion
  • The offer is aimed at resolving claims from Americans whose property was seized after 1959
This aligns with long‑standing Cuban policy:Cuba has always said it is willing to compensate claimants — but only as part of a broader normalization agreement with the U.S. (which has never been reached).

🏛️ Historical Context​


These are mostly corporations (e.g., Exxon, Coca‑Cola, ITT) and wealthy individuals whose assets were nationalized.

Spain, Canada, Switzerland, and the U.K. all reached settlement agreements with Cuba in the 1960s–1980s.

Because the embargo and diplomatic freeze made negotiations impossible.

🔍 What’s New Here?​

The article you’re reading suggests Cuba is now willing to:
  • Put a specific dollar figure on the table
  • Engage in direct negotiations
  • Frame it as part of a broader reconciliation effort
That’s a meaningful shift in tone, even if not yet a formal agreement.

🧱 What’s​

Cuba’s offer does not imply:
  • Reparations for mob‑owned casinos (as the forum thread jokes about)
  • Compensation for people whose ownership was never legally documented
  • Any admission of wrongdoing beyond the nationalization itself
The Cuban government’s position has always been:Nationalization was legal under international law, but compensation is owed.

🧭 Where This Could Go​

Whether anything happens depends on:
  • U.S.–Cuba diplomatic relations
  • The U.S. political climate
  • Whether both sides can agree on a valuation method
  • Whether the U.S. lifts or modifies parts of the embargo
Historically, these negotiations stall because each side wants concessions the other won’t give.
I cant imagine Cuba agreeing to reparations with other countries. All I see is there was a debt of 11 billion which Cuba defaulted on and they agreed to pay 2 billion on.

The important thing about reparations is that Cuba admits id di wrong.

can you provide some links with their reparation agreements with the other countries?
 
No, Anchovies this what you said - all of it.



If you have any evidence to support your opinion that X users are "those who can’t comprehend content beyond 280 characters", post it.

Of course, I will understand if you cannot.

BTW, there is no credible scientific or empirical evidence to suggest that X's (formerly Twitter's) character limit for posts causes, implies, or correlates with users being unable to comprehend longer messages.

In fact, short posts have been shown to support reading comprehension, summarization, argumentation, and critical thinking (e.g., college-level history students repurposing long texts into concise, cited posts).

digitalcommons.montclair.edu

Poor Anchovies.
Ah, lets see, the same demographic grouping that lead drug abuse and porn frequency just happen to also be the same age group that you say monopolize twitter, what a coincidence

Due to algorithms, frequent twitter users become actually less informed being less exposed to varying views and content. not to mention being constantly subjected to stupid tweets from stupid people

Plenty of studies showing how twitter dumbs down viewers, reduces attention spans, and can make recurrent users emotionally withdrawn

And twitter isn’t summarizing, your “college level students” reference is comical

As I said, for those comprehend content beyond 280 characters
 
Ah, lets see, the same demographic grouping that lead drug abuse and porn frequency just happen to also be the same age group that you say monopolize twitter, what a coincidence

That's quite a stretch, Anchovies. I'm glad you're getting some exercise.

BTW, I didn't say that any age group monopolizes X, Anchovies, because none does. I did make a mockery of your claim about school kids, though.

Monitoring twitter is nothing, that’s why it is popular with junior high kids and those who can’t comprehend content beyond 280 characters

Poor Anchovies.

Due to algorithms, frequent twitter users become actually less informed being less exposed to varying views and content. not to mention being constantly subjected to stupid tweets from stupid people Plenty of studies showing how twitter dumbs down viewers, reduces attention spans, and can make recurrent users emotionally withdrawn And twitter isn’t summarizing, your “college level students” reference is comical As I said, for those comprehend content beyond 280 characters

So you say, Anchovies.
 
That's quite a stretch, Anchovies. I'm glad you're getting some exercise.

BTW, I didn't say that any age group monopolizes X, Anchovies, because none does. I did make a mockery of your claim about school kids, though.



Poor Anchovies.



So you say, Anchovies.
Ah let’s see, per your post, “this means roughly 70% of X users worldwide are aged 18-34,” seventy percents sure sounds like the overwhelming user of twitter
 
Ah let’s see, per your post, “this means roughly 70% of X users worldwide are aged 18-34,” seventy percents sure sounds like the overwhelming user of twitter

It's obvious you don't know what "monopolize" means, Anchovies. Nor did I say anyone was "monopolizing" X.

Ah, lets see, the same demographic grouping that lead drug abuse and porn frequency just happen to also be the same age group that you say monopolize twitter, what a coincidence

Poor Anchovies.
 
Hey pal, that’s what you claimed

No, it isn't, Anchovies. That's why you didn't cite my post.

I just used it to prove my point

No, you didn't, Anchovies. You've misrepresnted what I said, moved the goalposts, and presented uncorrobrated statements.

You've been humiliated again in this thread. I am beginning to suspect that you enjoy it.

Poor Anchovies.
 
No, it isn't, Anchovies. That's why you didn't cite my post.



No, you didn't, Anchovies. You've misrepresnted what I said, moved the goalposts, and presented uncorrobrated statements.

You've been humiliated again in this thread. I am beginning to suspect that you enjoy it.

Poor Anchovies.
Hey pal, that is what you claimed, no moving goalposts, no misrepresenting, even included your exact quote, it is what it is, no matter how much you attempt to squirm out
 
Hey pal, that is what you claimed, no moving goalposts, no misrepresenting, even included your exact quote, it is what it is, no matter how much you attempt to squirm out

Once again you lie about what I posted, Anchovies. You fail to use the quote function for a reason. I know what that reason is, Anchovies.

Poor Anchovies.
 
So now you never said “this means roughly 70% of X users worldwide are aged 18-34?” NEXT

Yes, I said that, Anchovies. What I did not say was this:

Ah, lets see, the same demographic grouping that lead drug abuse and porn frequency just happen to also be the same age group that you say monopolize twitter, what a coincidence

And you never posted any evidence for your other claims, did you, Anchovies? Do so now, if you can.

Due to algorithms, frequent twitter users become actually less informed being less exposed to varying views and content. not to mention being constantly subjected to stupid tweets from stupid people Plenty of studies showing how twitter dumbs down viewers, reduces attention spans, and can make recurrent users emotionally withdrawn And twitter isn’t summarizing, your “college level students” reference is comical As I said, for those comprehend content beyond 280 characters

Poor Anchovies.
 
Based on what I'm seeing from Florida Cubans,
we're probably taking the wrong approach.

If ICE really wanted to make themselves useful,
they should be sending many of these American-born people to Cuba.
They're right-wing nutjobs, and Diaz-Canal
can probably deal with them better than we seem to be able to do.
 
Back
Top