Cruz vows not to certify Biden win without probe of baseless voter fraud claims

I know more than you do. If you had something of substance I would debate you.

In case you don't know how to use a dictionary:



trea·​son | \ ˈtrē-zᵊn \
Definition of treason
1: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
2: the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/treason

Sooo......definition #1 covers Biden and China and definition #2 covers the Democrat party. Thanks for making that clear.
 
I know more than you do. If you had something of substance I would debate you.

In case you don't know how to use a dictionary:



trea·​son | \ ˈtrē-zᵊn \
Definition of treason
1: the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
2: the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY

That was my point. You are just using the term as a derogatory insult rather than a criminal violation which must occur during a time of war.

Knowing more than I do obviously does not apply to treasonous offenses.
 
That was my point. You are just using the term as a derogatory insult rather than a criminal violation which must occur during a time of war.

Knowing more than I do obviously does not apply to treasonous offenses.

You are dumb and I find you annoying.
 
You are dumb and I find you annoying.

Again, no substantive knowledge to challenge anything I said. If you don't know enough about a subject it is just best not to reply.

Your insults put you in the same category as those Trump people supporters who spread hate.
 
Again, no substantive knowledge to challenge anything I said. If you don't know enough about a subject it is just best not to reply.

Your insults put you in the same category as those Trump people supporters who spread hate.

I am surprised you consider yourself to be educated. You don't understand basic definitions of words. Like other trolls, you're either stupid or a jerkoff.
 
I am surprised you consider yourself to be educated. You don't understand basic definitions of words. Like other trolls, you're either stupid or a jerkoff.

A person is not a traitor unless they violate laws against treason which must be during times of war. You are apparently unaware of this fact.

I never said I consider myself educated, but I can point out when others are in error if it is a subject I know something about.
 
quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by Flash

Insults never substitute for lack of knowledge.


Horseshit. Your entire party has devalued knowledge, science and intelligence for decades, and never more than now.
What you stated works with US, but most certainly carries no weight in the Republican base. Disinformation and insult
sloganeering is the field of play to which your dumbass party always wishes to switch the battle.

 
A person is not a traitor unless they violate laws against treason which must be during times of war.

Words don't mean what you want them to mean. Sorry, douchebag. I gave a dictionary definition which accurately describes the common meaning of "treason."

And thanks for admitting you are not educated, it shows.
 
A person is not a traitor unless they violate laws against treason which must be during times of war. You are apparently unaware of this fact.

I never said I consider myself educated, but I can point out when others are in error if it is a subject I know something about.

Flash, give yourself some credit here. Your education outshines most on this board and BP's in particular.
 
Words don't mean what you want them to mean. Sorry, douchebag. I gave a dictionary definition which accurately describes the common meaning of "treason."

And thanks for admitting you are not educated, it shows.

When I asked "So, it is just a charge of treason without having any legal meaning?" your answer was "yes"? That is all you had to say rather than posting an insult.

I didn't say I wasn't educated, I just said I don't consider myself educated because there is so much I don't know. But I will match you on political and constitutional issues any day.
 
When I asked "So, it is just a charge of treason without having any legal meaning?" your answer was "yes"? That is all you had to say rather than posting an insult.

I didn't say I wasn't educated, I just said I don't consider myself educated because there is so much I don't know. But I will match you on political and constitutional issues any day.


zzzzzzzzzzz
 
quote_icon.png
Originally Posted by Flash

So, it is just a charge of treason without having any legal meaning? Like calling Democrats communist...


How about you just say whether or not you are OK with this shit your disgraceful scumbag party has
been CAUGHT RED HANDED doing, and covering for with naked power for a long time? Do you have the courage of Romney? If not you are the dismissible fuckshit
BidenPotus says you are. Time of war my ass. A coup de etat is a state of war, a covert criminal one. You are at war with America
as bad as the Soviet Union, England, Vietnam, Korea, the Axis, Afghanistan taliban, any of them. You are an internal threat and war
against your own country. Trump is a fucking traitor to that flag he defames on his lapel. And so are all his diminished capacity cult morons.
 
Nearly a dozen Republican senators and senators-elect led by Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas said Saturday they will reject electors from certain states won by President-elect Joe Biden, citing unsubstantiated allegations of voter fraud and calling for an emergency 10-day audit of the results, an unprecedented attempt to thwart the democratic process.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...e-certify-electors-unless-audit-is-conducted/

Cruz is a traitor. And you know what we used to do with traitors....

Luckily we do not need Cruz. He is in the minority on that one.
 
ITs interesting, if it was so "baseless" the media and you all wouldn't need to repeat that it's baseless every single time the subject is brought up. seems they want to sell a narrative rather than investigate if it actually is baseless or not.
 
Back
Top