Holy shit, I hadn't even finished that post before you jumped in!! Here is a table to give you some idea of natural radiation. Those fish were found to have 4 bq/kg for Cs 134 and 6 bq/kg for Cs 137
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 adult human (100 Bq/kg)[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]7000 Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 kg of coffee[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1000 Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 kg superphosphate fertiliser[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]5000 Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]The air in a 100 sq metre Australian home (radon)[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]3000 Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]The air in many 100 sq metre European homes (radon)[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]up to 30 000 Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 household smoke detector (with americium)[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]30 000 Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]Radioisotope for medical diagnosis[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]70 million Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]Radioisotope source for medical therapy[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]100 000 000 million Bq (100 TBq)[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 kg 50-year old vitrified high-level nuclear waste[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]10 000 000 million Bq (10 TBq)[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 luminous Exit sign (1970s)[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 000 000 million Bq (1 TBq)[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 kg uranium[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]25 million Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 kg uranium ore (Canadian, 15%)[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]25 million Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 kg uranium ore (Australian, 0.3%[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]500 000 Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 kg low level radioactive waste[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 million Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 kg of coal ash[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]2000 Bq[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1 kg of granite[/TD]
[TD="class: bodycopy"]1000 Bq[/TD]
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...Blow-Out-in-Caspian-Sea&p=1010076#post1010076
Holy shit, change the subject again.
Listen Rune, I have tried to be nice to you but now I can't be fucking bothered. You are just an wilfully ignorant person who has little understanding of even basic science, I can't help anymore!
I don't need you to be nice, just respond to the comments instead of changing the subject constantly.
It is like trying to debate Superfreak.
He prob owns 100 shares out of toothless pride.
You regurgitate half baked rubbish that you've garnered from left wing blogs and I respond with some basic science. The tuna are a good case in point, if you believe those blogs then those blue fin tuna are practically glowing from radiation. Whereas the truth is there is far more radiation in a brazil nut or a banana than in the average tuna. They are perfectly safe to east but fools like you just swallow that bullshit hook, line and sinker.
Listen shit for brains, for the last time, the issue is the contaminated breeding grounds, not a single tuna four months and seven thousand miles from the spill.
Address the issue of the contaminated breeding grounds.
Tell us how the excess radiation will not harm newly spawned and juvinille tuna.
Liar I made thousands and thanked you. I'm just ragging you nancy, if your panties are that bunched up I'll lay off.I gave you a fucking good tip on Molycorp and all I got in return was fucking insults.
Liar I made thousands and thanked you. I'm just ragging you nancy, if your panties are that bunched up I'll lay off.
What are you on about now? You talk about the spill presumably meaning oil and then proceed to talk about excess radiation!! Oh and by the way, the word is spelt juvenile not juvinille.
If you would stop blathering and read the posts, you would know that I have been "on about" the spill of radioactive water into the Sea of Japan the whole time.
Fisher and the study’s lead author, Daniel Madigan of Stanford University’s Hopkins Marine Station, were both quick to point out that the levels of radiation found in the tuna shouldn’t be a problem for humans. There are natural levels of radioactivity in the tuna, and Fukushima has only added the slightest amount more. (The report can be found here.) “But people are often anxious about radioactivity,” says Fisher.
And this may be what ultimately benefits the Bluefin. The fish, Madigan points out, is not harmed by the radiation that they collected while swimming through the spill waters off the coast of Japan after the tsunami.
But the public perception of the fish may be contaminated for good. And that may keep it out of restaurants.
It's not my problem if you do not explain yourself clearly. I have already stated that blue fin tuna are over fished and that the radiation may be a blessing in disguise. It's looks like I am not the only who thinks that's the case either.http://www.forbes.com/sites/montebu...una-actually-help-save-the-imperiled-species/
If they put slightly radiated tuna on the menu I'm passing.
I said that wind power is a waste of time, which it is. You don't agree and nothing I can say will change your mind so I'll not bother. It must be very satisfying to have the Cajun clodhopper batting for you!