Credit where credit is due…

Dutch Uncle said:
Sure you have. Hamas won't disarm. They are dedicated to killing all the Jews and pushing their bodies into the sea.

Sample:
0*cvAf8CyR069hqsK_.jpg
Click to expand...
I have seen no legitimate map for the proposed two state boundaries.

I have seen maps of all the land Israel settlers have stolen over the years.

Your map has no source, it’s junk
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Best guess is that about 400000 are dead so far....we need a census done by someone we can trust.
Click to expand...
Yes, who would conduct that "accurate census" in Gaza? Hamas? Al Jazeera maybe? And why do we even care about the exact numbers? Are we gonna hand out money or political clout based on the body count? There will never be a trustworthy figure from there. Nobody's gonna buy it.

They don't have a Social Security Administration, births often happened at home with zero records, or they kept it hush-hush. Any "data" they pushed was straight propaganda, shared by terrorists, you dumbass. Gaza was never a hub for truth or accuracy. We can all agree on that.

Time to move on, eliminate anyone coloring outside the lines, stirring chaos and endless destruction. This time, the Arabs actually want peace and profit to take over. At least that's what I'm seeing. You're just hooked on your shortwave radio conspiracy pals on X, peddling an alternative reality that's constantly proven ass-backwards.
 
Phantasmal said:
I have seen no legitimate map for the proposed two state boundaries.

I have seen maps of all the land Israel settlers have stolen over the years.

Your map has no source, it’s junk
Click to expand...
Pre-1967 boundaries and the return of settlement lands have been commonly proposed.

At least I had a map. :)
 
Phantasmal said:
I have seen no legitimate map for the proposed two state boundaries.

I have seen maps of all the land Israel settlers have stolen over the years.

Your map has no source, it’s junk
Click to expand...

If that sneaky bastard Arafat had signed up to the deal offered to him by Olmert in 2008 then you wouldn't been bitching about the settlements now. Of course the fucker was far more interested in passing on his ill gotten gains, estimated to be over 8 billion dollars to his wife, she has gone to ground and believed to be living in the South of France.
 
Last edited:
serendipity said:
If that sneaky bastard Arafat had signed up to the deal offered to him by Olmert in 2008 then you wouldn't been bitching about the settlements now. Of course the fucker was far more interested in passing on his ill gotten gains, estimated to be over 8 billion dollars to his wife, she has gone to ground and believed to be living in the South of France.
Click to expand...
why are you talking about 2008?
 
Tobytone said:
Yes, who would conduct that "accurate census" in Gaza? Hamas? Al Jazeera maybe? And why do we even care about the exact numbers? Are we gonna hand out money or political clout based on the body count? There will never be a trustworthy figure from there. Nobody's gonna buy it.

They don't have a Social Security Administration, births often happened at home with zero records, or they kept it hush-hush. Any "data" they pushed was straight propaganda, shared by terrorists, you dumbass. Gaza was never a hub for truth or accuracy. We can all agree on that.

Time to move on, eliminate anyone coloring outside the lines, stirring chaos and endless destruction. This time, the Arabs actually want peace and profit to take over. At least that's what I'm seeing. You're just hooked on your shortwave radio conspiracy pals on X, peddling an alternative reality that's constantly proven ass-backwards.
Click to expand...

Sweet Phanny Addams is none too bright.
 
Tobytone said:
Yes, who would conduct that "accurate census" in Gaza? Hamas? Al Jazeera maybe? And why do we even care about the exact numbers? Are we gonna hand out money or political clout based on the body count? There will never be a trustworthy figure from there. Nobody's gonna buy it.

They don't have a Social Security Administration, births often happened at home with zero records, or they kept it hush-hush. Any "data" they pushed was straight propaganda, shared by terrorists, you dumbass. Gaza was never a hub for truth or accuracy. We can all agree on that.

Time to move on, eliminate anyone coloring outside the lines, stirring chaos and endless destruction. This time, the Arabs actually want peace and profit to take over. At least that's what I'm seeing. You're just hooked on your shortwave radio conspiracy pals on X, peddling an alternative reality that's constantly proven ass-backwards.
Click to expand...
china cannot have the rest of the world coming together.

hawkeye is a ching Chong Bing bong.
 
neocon fuckjars who want this to continue are agents of China.

:truestory:

Origins of Neoconservatism​

Historical Background​

Neoconservatism emerged in the United States during the late 1960s. It began as a reaction among liberal intellectuals who were disillusioned with the Democratic Party's shift towards pacifism and the radicalism of the New Left. Many of these early neoconservatives had roots in leftist politics, particularly anti-communism.

Key Figures​

Several prominent figures played a significant role in the development of neoconservatism:

  • Irving Kristol: Often referred to as the "godfather of neoconservatism," Kristol transitioned from a Trotskyist background to a more conservative stance.
  • Daniel Patrick Moynihan: A key intellectual who also moved from leftist ideologies to embrace neoconservative principles.
  • Jeane Kirkpatrick: An influential diplomat who advocated for a strong U.S. foreign policy, reflecting neoconservative values.

Ideological Shift​

Initially, neoconservatives were aligned with Cold War liberalism, supporting anti-communist policies while also endorsing social welfare programs. However, as they distanced themselves from the left, they adopted a more aggressive stance on foreign policy, emphasizing military intervention and the promotion of democracy abroad.

Cultural Critique​

Neoconservatives expressed strong opposition to the counterculture of the 1960s, which they believed undermined traditional values and authority. This cultural critique was a significant factor in their ideological evolution, leading them to advocate for a return to conservative principles in both domestic and foreign policy.

Conclusion​

The origins of neoconservatism are deeply intertwined with a reaction against leftist ideologies, particularly communism. Its founders, many of whom had leftist backgrounds, shifted towards a more interventionist and culturally conservative stance, shaping the movement's distinct identity
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top