BartenderElite
Verified User
I’m pretty sure it would be actual discrimination lol.
Under U.S. law?
I’m pretty sure it would be actual discrimination lol.
Darth gets dumber by the day. Eliminating Covid does not require 100% of people are vaccinated. It could be eliminated with no one vaccinated.
Under U.S. law?
Einstein, when we had 100 confirmed cases our actual case number probably approached well over a thousand AND it was in different regions of the country.
The real *consequential* lying was done by your communist allies in Beijing. While THEY were lying their infected nationals were landing at our airports by the thousands if not tens of thousands. And nobody [but Fauci] had a clue.
Speaking of liars: your buddy Fauci FULL WELL KNEW that a lab leak was a distinct possibility while he was claiming otherwise. Fauci, could have alerted Trump to this *distinct possibility* well before Trump ‘failed to take it seriously’ or whatever. The very DAY word came from China about a mysterious respiratory virus going around the Wuhan lab HE could have changed things.
But he failed to. The Trump virus narrative is lame attempt to politicize the virus against Trump and it’s a joke.
bullshit, asshole. i admit no president could have avoided huge pandemic losses, but a president more concerned with his ratings and his dow jones average than in the lives and health of Americans is bound to suck at dealing with such a crisis. obama would have saved hundreds of thousands of lives compared to trump. and biden. and clinton. even gomer bush or reagan.
and it does not matter at all if the virus was natural or man made, dumbfuck.
Under U.S. law?
It will find its way to SCOTUS if they press on it. And be argued as a discrimination case.
Politically it’s a non-starter so it’s academic. If democrats walk that plank they are more crazy than I’ve been giving them credit for. Always a possibility, granted.
Delusional.
Ron Klain was on Obama’s team and he said ‘they got lucky’ with H1N1.
There isn’t a person on the earth who was going to save ‘100’s of thousands of lives’ SINCE THE CCP set us up to get a pandemic. They set the whole world up for it and NOT ONE SINGLE WESTERN LEADER will do so much as call them on it. But they managed to rid themselves of the one leader that would. Score one for China and the globalists.
Some days I think we deserve to be invaded.
Well that's promising.
It will find its way to SCOTUS if they press on it. And be argued as a discrimination case.
Politically it’s a non-starter so it’s academic. If democrats walk that plank they are more crazy than I’ve been giving them credit for. Always a possibility, granted.
No they won't. SCOTUS doesn't take controversies anymore. Just tranny bathrooma.
You notice the idiot misread the claim in the OP re. 99.5%?So they can't spread it to someone else?
LOL at you.
are any of those insignias you post have to do with how mentally deranged you are?
It's not Democrats making these decisions. It's private institutions and businesses.
Something like that wouldn't ever get near the Supreme Court. You should look up what discrimination means under U.S. law.
"So I said to my people, slow the testing down please!"
Great pandemic President.
Wouldn’t have mattered if they did lol.
Cases decoupled from hospitalizations at least a year ago. Critics even coined a term for it ‘case-edemic’. As a matter of fact, we have some case-edemics going on as we speak. There’s one poster who will read this that started a thread on one.
Lol.
It means Christian bakers have to make gay wedding cakes. So it could easily mean businesses can’t discriminate based on what people choose to do with their bodies. Or not to do with them.
Do you have an excuse for everything he said?
He didn't want more testing, because more testing would lead to higher #'s of infected showing up, and he thought that would look bad.
Um, no.