Court case in Georgia Monday July 19 likely to give Senate back to GOP!!

[Into the Night]

^
^
^
Fallacy fallacy - Rather then responding to a statement simply claim a fallacy while not explaining why the alleged fallacy occurred.

Mockery. Denial of logic.

 

[Into the Night]

And yet you have no evidence? Massive cheating would have left evidence.

Think about it, a massive landslide would be maybe 10 million votes. Add to that 7 million votes that Biden lead by, and Democrats would have to cheat by 17 million votes, in tens of thousands of voting districts. That would be massive, and would leave a lot of evidence.

It did. Evidence has already been shown to you.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Mockery. Buzzword fallacies.

^
^
^
Fallacy fallacy - Rather then responding to a statement simply claim a fallacy while not explaining why the alleged fallacy occurred.

 

[Into the Night]

It was an utter waste of the courts time. Just like the rest of the lawsuits that have been filed.

The court didn't spend any significant time on the case.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Mockery. Denial of logic.

I am curious. Can you point out the premise and the conclusion in the following since you are claiming I am denying your logic?

Mockery. Buzzword fallacy. Denial of history.

 

[Moosakofsky]

Not to say I’m optimistic but this case is different.

If laws were broken they should redo the election. Well, unless the laws are meaningless they would *have to* redo the election. But I’m confident the judge will find some wiggle room and get out of it.

Elections are never redone, no matter what. There was a case in California a while back where it was well documented widespread fraud had occurred . People were tried and convicted. But the election stood.

 

[Into the Night]

I am curious. Can you point out the premise and the conclusion in the following since you are claiming I am denying your logic?

Already did. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

Elections are never redone, no matter what. There was a case in California a while back where it was well documented widespread fraud had occurred . People were tried and convicted. But the election stood.

That WAS, however, in the SOTC.

Elections are redone all the time...usually because of election fraud invalidating an election, or a result too close to call.
It's happened in NV, GA, and several other States.

 

[Concart]

Elections are never redone, no matter what. There was a case in California a while back where it was well documented widespread fraud had occurred . People were tried and convicted. But the election stood.

Actually, the North Carolina Ninth Congressional district election was redone in 2019 after it was established that there was massive cheating by the Republican candidate in the 2018 election. Enough said. So there is precedent. When actual evidence of massive fraud by a campaign can be demonstrated. Which is not in the case in a single one of these lawsuits brought by Republicans. The only ones that have been caught in a large scale voter fraud in any recent election are Republicans. Irony noted.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Already did. RQAA.

^
^
^
Red Herring fallacy.

No evidence of your premise or conclusion can be found. Your avoidance of providing any support for you claim is noted.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Actually, the North Carolina Ninth Congressional district election was redone in 2019 after it was established that there was massive cheating by the Republican candidate in the 2018 election. Enough said. So there is precedent. When actual evidence of massive fraud by a campaign can be demonstrated. Which is not in the case in a single one of these lawsuits brought by Republicans. The only ones that have been caught in a large scale voter fraud in any recent election are Republicans. Irony noted.

In that case in North Carolina the election was never certified.

 

[Walt]

Not at all. Judges refuse to hear the cases!!!! They know how damning the evidence is.

The Republican judges know that there is no evidence. That is why the lawyers who claimed there was evidence are being disbarred.

 

[Concart]

In that case in North Carolina the election was never certified.

Yep, which is the ONLY reason they would have the opportunity to re-do the election. Certification is the states seal of approval. Certification means it's over.

 

[Walt]

It did. Evidence has already been shown to you.

I have not seen the Kraken. If you believe I have seen the Kraken, then you are delusional. There is no two ways about it.

 

[Into the Night]

^
^
^
Red Herring fallacy.

No evidence of your premise or conclusion can be found. Your avoidance of providing any support for you claim is noted.

Already did. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

The Republican judges know that there is no evidence. That is why the lawyers who claimed there was evidence are being disbarred.

There is evidence. You cannot wish it away. It has already been presented to you.

 

[Into the Night]

I have not seen the Kraken. If you believe I have seen the Kraken, then you are delusional. There is no two ways about it.

Not about any Kraken or any lawyer. The evidence has already been shown to you. Pivot fallacy.

 

[Althea]

Actually, the North Carolina Ninth Congressional district election was redone in 2019 after it was established that there was massive cheating by the Republican candidate in the 2018 election. Enough said. So there is precedent. When actual evidence of massive fraud by a campaign can be demonstrated. Which is not in the case in a single one of these lawsuits brought by Republicans. The only ones that have been caught in a large scale voter fraud in any recent election are Republicans. Irony noted.

In other news, a judge tossed the frivolous suit referenced in the OP today.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

In other news, a judge tossed the frivolous suit referenced in the OP today.

"A Henry County judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to overturn the runoff elections that gave Democrats control of the U.S. Senate.

"The lawsuit aimed to void the election of Georgia’s Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff to the U.S. Senate. But Superior Court Judge Brian Amero rejected the effort at a hearing Monday."

https://www.ajc.com/politics/judge-...-senate-elections/I6QLFSUFHRBYJFIT7WNRIECM7M/

Tsk.

 

[Moosakofsky]

Actually, the North Carolina Ninth Congressional district election was redone in 2019 after it was established that there was massive cheating by the Republican candidate in the 2018 election. Enough said. So there is precedent. When actual evidence of massive fraud by a campaign can be demonstrated. Which is not in the case in a single one of these lawsuits brought by Republicans. The only ones that have been caught in a large scale voter fraud in any recent election are Republicans. Irony noted.

Odd that in the 2019 special election the repub. nom. won by even more votes than the guy that cheated.