red states rule
New member
and another liberal who ignores the liberal media bias, and another sttempt by the left to censor an opposing POV
You were exposed long ago dear
Coulter Bagged by Media Matters
- Thread starter Cancel7
- Start date
and another liberal who ignores the liberal media bias, and another sttempt by the left to censor an opposing POV
You were exposed long ago dear
Let's see, media bias vs your supporting a terrorist sypmathizer who called for the death of Americans...hmm, yeah I guess I'd be embarrassed if I were you too.
Your nic will be Mister Anti-American.
If there is one thing I really despise it's an American who hates their own country. I think that is just so sad.
red states rule
New member
and NBC who gave glowing praise, and puff interviews to Obama's buddy Bill Ayers who DID BOMB government buildings and police stations
No wonder the audience for NBC and MSNBC is tanking
NBC can have more people like Chevy Chase, Jeanane Garofalo, Roseanne Barr. Michael Moore on, and anyone else who hates Pres Bush and worships PE Obama to make you happy Darla
C
Cancel3
Guest
Coulter is nothing short of a hateful bitch. She is the talk radio version of a shock-jock.
She has said so many things that crossed the line it is ridiculous.
No one is shutting opposing views. They are just removing a distasteful person from the airwaves.
And since NBC is a privately owned business, I would think that this would be a sign of the freedom for a business to to what they think will be good for THEIR bottom line.
She has said so many things that crossed the line it is ridiculous.
No one is shutting opposing views. They are just removing a distasteful person from the airwaves.
And since NBC is a privately owned business, I would think that this would be a sign of the freedom for a business to to what they think will be good for THEIR bottom line.
red states rule
New member
So Matthews and Overbiote are not hateful?
BTW, it loks like NBC is backtracking and not banning Ann. Given how badly they are tanking in the ratings, they must see how Ann can give their ratings a much needed boost
RSR I am here to guarantee you that you are 100% correct. Liberals do have a bias against terrorist sympathizers who, feeling that 3,000 dead Americans wasn't enough, called for more American deaths, and the blowing up of more American buildings. We surely do. Now, I know this is hard for an America-hating guy like yourself to fathom, but that's who we are. And proud of it.
C
Cancel3
Guest
I didn't say they weren't.
How about this, I will post some lunatic quotes from Coulter, and you find some that match the inasnity from Matthews and Whathisname.
"If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."
"I was going to have a few comments about John Edwards but you have to go into rehab if you use the word faggot." --at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference
"I'm more of a man than any liberal."
"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband's deaths so much." -on 9/11 widows who have been critical of the Bush administration
"Liberals love America like O.J. loved Nicole."
"There are a lot of bad republicans; there are no good democrats."
"We need to execute people like (John Walker Lindh) in order to physically intimidate liberals."
"Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots."
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity."
"Liberals are stalwart defenders of civil liberties -- provided we're only talking about criminals."
"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
No you can say what you want about silencing opposing voices, but anyone who would say these things is someone that a reasonable network wouldn't want on the air.
Gosh it must be hard work trying to fog the issue by confusing political speech with a terrorist sympathizer like Coulter who called for the deaths of more Americans, right after 9/11. I am so glad I'm not an America-hater like you are. I wouldn't want to have to go through all of that.
red states rule
New member
RSR I am here to guarantee you that you are 100% correct. Liberals do have a bias against terrorist sympathizers who, feeling that 3,000 dead Americans wasn't enough, called for more American deaths, and the blowing up of more American buildings. We surely do. Now, I know this is hard for an America-hating guy like yourself to fathom, but that's who we are. And proud of it.
Yea, libs do love American hating people, Look at all the spin you gave Obama's close friends like Ayers and Wright
People can scream "GD America" and blow up Federal buildings and Police stations -and you yawn because it might harm your candidate
Gosh it is even worse than I thought? I hope RSR can let go of his terrorist-supporting, America-hating ways. I will tell you the truth, I don't believe that Obama is going to hold with this kind of thing. I don't believe he is going to be coddling terrorists the way our last adminstration did. RSR might find himself in a bit of trouble.
What a shame, what a shame. You know RSR, America is not all bad. This is a terrible way for you to feel, just terrible.
red states rule
New member
But back to NBC
Keith Olbermann Admits MSNBC Is Liberally Biased
By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
September 15, 2007 - 11:54 ET
The idea that cable network MSNBC is liberally biased is certainly no stunning revelation. However, when one of its foremost liberal hosts, Keith Olbermann, admits it on the air, that is truly something to behold.
Such actually occurred Thursday evening, and was captured for posterity by Real Clear Politics' Blake Dvorak (h/t NBer SMGalbraith, video available here courtesy Olbermann Watch with thanks to NB reader Damien G.).
To set this up, Democrat presidential candidate John Edwards bought some advertising time on MSNBC Thursday evening to respond to President Bush's address to the nation concerning Iraq. After the ad finished, Olbermann disgracefully said the following:
"I don't want to be diverted by talking about commercials in the middle of the show but, Rachel, why on earth did he buy that commercial? I don't think I'm saying anything unknown to the audience, I don't think he would have gotten a hard time from this particular network. Why on earth did we do it that way?"
Fascinating, wouldn't you agree? After all, here was a highly-paid newscaster asking an Air America radio host why a Democrat presidential candidate would bother spending money advertising on his network when everyone knows how biased it is
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/09/15/keith-olbermann-admits-msnbc-liberally-biased
Keith Olbermann Admits MSNBC Is Liberally Biased
By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
September 15, 2007 - 11:54 ET
The idea that cable network MSNBC is liberally biased is certainly no stunning revelation. However, when one of its foremost liberal hosts, Keith Olbermann, admits it on the air, that is truly something to behold.
Such actually occurred Thursday evening, and was captured for posterity by Real Clear Politics' Blake Dvorak (h/t NBer SMGalbraith, video available here courtesy Olbermann Watch with thanks to NB reader Damien G.).
To set this up, Democrat presidential candidate John Edwards bought some advertising time on MSNBC Thursday evening to respond to President Bush's address to the nation concerning Iraq. After the ad finished, Olbermann disgracefully said the following:
"I don't want to be diverted by talking about commercials in the middle of the show but, Rachel, why on earth did he buy that commercial? I don't think I'm saying anything unknown to the audience, I don't think he would have gotten a hard time from this particular network. Why on earth did we do it that way?"
Fascinating, wouldn't you agree? After all, here was a highly-paid newscaster asking an Air America radio host why a Democrat presidential candidate would bother spending money advertising on his network when everyone knows how biased it is
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/09/15/keith-olbermann-admits-msnbc-liberally-biased
I'd want to change the subject too, if I was supporting a terrorist like this RSR:
"If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."
"I was going to have a few comments about John Edwards but you have to go into rehab if you use the word faggot." --at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference
"I'm more of a man than any liberal."
"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband's deaths so much." -on 9/11 widows who have been critical of the Bush administration
"Liberals love America like O.J. loved Nicole."
"There are a lot of bad republicans; there are no good democrats."
"We need to execute people like (John Walker Lindh) in order to physically intimidate liberals."
"Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots."
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity."
"Liberals are stalwart defenders of civil liberties -- provided we're only talking about criminals."
"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
"If I'm going to say anything about John Edwards in the future, I'll just wish he had been killed in a terrorist assassination plot."
"I was going to have a few comments about John Edwards but you have to go into rehab if you use the word faggot." --at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference
"I'm more of a man than any liberal."
"These broads are millionaires, lionized on TV and in articles about them, reveling in their status as celebrities and stalked by griefparrazies. I have never seen people enjoying their husband's deaths so much." -on 9/11 widows who have been critical of the Bush administration
"Liberals love America like O.J. loved Nicole."
"There are a lot of bad republicans; there are no good democrats."
"We need to execute people like (John Walker Lindh) in order to physically intimidate liberals."
"Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots."
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity."
"Liberals are stalwart defenders of civil liberties -- provided we're only talking about criminals."
"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
C
Cancel3
Guest
Excuse me??
Coulter made the statement "My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building." and you have the gall to call liberals "terrorists"??
Look at this statement:
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity."
Now are you honestly going to say there is an ounce of difference between what she advocated and what the Taliban or the extremists muslims did?
red states rule
New member
Change the subject? NBC saus they do not want anyone critical of PE Obama - yet they keep people like Keith and Chris on the air
Ann is a oped writer not a reporter or politican
She is funny, and drives libs up a wall.
Also, it looks like NBC is not banning her - much to your disamy Darla. Even if they did, it would give Ann more time to go on Fox News, where there are about 3 times the viewers she would get on MSNBC
C
Cancel3
Guest
Ok, let me help you out with some information.
First of all, the network is not a government owned network. The entire purpose of this network is to make a profit. In order to do that, they make decisions about what is the best way to attract viewers and advertisers. They decided that having a liberal slant is the best way. Just like Fox decided that having a conservative slant is the best way to maximize profits.
Second of all, if a private business does something you don't like (but breaks no law) you have two choices. You can take your business elsewhere or you can whine about it.
red states rule
New member
With their declining ratings the profit margin could be better. NBC is the official Obama network, and the audience knows it
MSNBC is usually crushed by Fox News across the board
As far as your point take your business elsewhere or you can whine about it - liberals can hold clases on protesting outside the corporate building and targeting sponsors
C
Cancel3
Guest
So, when liberals protest Fox news, you would support them?
Or would you call them "whiners" like most people did?
And now that you are basically doing the same thing, you want to use THEIR whining as justification for your own whining?
Can you honestly say that you think Ann Coulter is worth saving? I am not asking if you like the way she pisses off the libtards. But is she actually worth saving?
red states rule
New member
Oh and lets not have any bias at NBC 
Keith Olbermann Now a Regular Daily Kos Contributor?
By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
January 26, 2008 - 12:08 ET
Imagine for a moment Fox News's Brit Hume or Chris Wallace regularly contributing to a popular conservative website like Captain's Quarters, Little Green Footballs, or Michelle Malkin.com.
Do you think the media would have a field day with a supposedly "fair and balanced" anchorman being so intricately connected to such a rightwing entity?
If the answer is "Yes," then why does MSNBC's Keith Olbermann get a pass for his posts at the far-left website Daily Kos, and the appearance that this is becoming a regular gig?
Consider that on Friday, Olbermann published his third posting at DKos in less than two weeks:
I had a shot of cortisone in my hand Friday afternoon so I'm still not certain I'm not hallucinating this, even though I've seen it on the Reuters news wire, read it aloud to a couple of colleagues, and put it out on Countdown as the closer to "Bushed!"
Attorney General Michael Mukasey says he has hung two portraits in his new office. And one of them is of George Orwell.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...h-olbermann-now-regular-daily-kos-contributor
Keith Olbermann Now a Regular Daily Kos Contributor?
By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
January 26, 2008 - 12:08 ET
Imagine for a moment Fox News's Brit Hume or Chris Wallace regularly contributing to a popular conservative website like Captain's Quarters, Little Green Footballs, or Michelle Malkin.com.
Do you think the media would have a field day with a supposedly "fair and balanced" anchorman being so intricately connected to such a rightwing entity?
If the answer is "Yes," then why does MSNBC's Keith Olbermann get a pass for his posts at the far-left website Daily Kos, and the appearance that this is becoming a regular gig?
Consider that on Friday, Olbermann published his third posting at DKos in less than two weeks:
I had a shot of cortisone in my hand Friday afternoon so I'm still not certain I'm not hallucinating this, even though I've seen it on the Reuters news wire, read it aloud to a couple of colleagues, and put it out on Countdown as the closer to "Bushed!"
Attorney General Michael Mukasey says he has hung two portraits in his new office. And one of them is of George Orwell.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...h-olbermann-now-regular-daily-kos-contributor
red states rule
New member
They have every right to do so. Libs tell us to shut up or turn the dial - while libs want the "offending" host or show removed from the air
Big difference
C
Cancel3
Guest
I think that christian fundamentalists have protested to have people and programs removed from the airwaves far more than liberals ever have.
And they are certainly part of the conservative movement.