Could Putin be behind the terrorist attacks? He's done it before

blackascoal

The Force is With Me
An act of terror was what brought Putin to power .. and terrorism has always been a useful tool in Putin's arsenal.

The Unsolved Mystery Behind the Act of Terror That Brought Putin to Power
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...partment-house-bombings-was-putin-responsible

Putin May Have Bombed His Own Metro
It is not unthinkable. He’s done it before.

excerpt ..

... Putin’s Russia is a terrorist state. For one, it uses Terror internally. The Chechnyan government kidnaps and murders people who are gay.[4] Putin arrested hundreds of protestors on March 26th*—*many of them young, even teenagers. Putin’s system uses bribes, threats of violence, repressive laws, and brute force to control the media and civil society. Those not willfully loyal to Putin are cowed into self-censorship. Even more, oppositional voices are largely ignored, because Putin’s propaganda state has made at least at least 8/10 Russians true believers.[5] Such true believers listen neither to opinions nor facts which contradict their beliefs, and will never change their position.

But Putin’s Russia is not only an internal terrorist state, it is also externally terrorist. He invaded Ukraine.[6] In the occupied areas, the rulers of his colonies use Terror as a governing tactic. The invasion itself — aside from being aggressive, imperialist, et cetera — was a terrorist act because he had the Russian military remove its insignia, thus making their origins unclear. Force by anyone other than a state is terrorism, pure and simple. So when a state’s military pretends to not be from that state as it fights, that is by definition terrorism.

And then there is Syria. Putin’s interventions there have had nothing to do with ISIS. They are all about strategy, the growth of Russian power in the Middle East. In order to accomplish such growth, Putin is supporting what amounts to a Fascist state (Assad’s Syria is a one-party state, and that party is Arab Nazis).[7] By propping up Assad, Putin prolongs Assad’s Terror. Even more, Putin’s own military itself commits acts of Terror within Syria, bombing civilian targets rather than those of armed rebels. The goal of such bombings is to demographically cleanse opposition cities and towns. Putin has killed thousands. During the fall of Aleppo, “the attacks were so frequent, and some key hospitals were struck so many times, that the incidents appear to constitute a systematic attempt to destroy the city’s medical support.”[8] Statements from the Russian government or the military cannot change the reality for the victims, and the reality is that the goal is Terror, to force people to flee. Europe is well aware that this tactic has been a successful one.

The Terror from Putin’s forces in Syria is a literal Holocaust. It is mass, industrial death of people because of their supposed allegiance. The goal is to kill, humiliate, torment, and remove from the country all who may be supportive of the anti-Assad cause. Putin’s intervention is illegal; it props up a Terror state; and the intervention’s method of operation itself is Terror.

As if all of this were not enough, Putin’s Russia has committed similar acts of Terror elsewhere. The same thing has been happening in occupied parts of Georgia since 2008. It just seems that everyone who is not presently in these places, not being raped, tortured, robbed, humiliated, and killed at the moment, has forgotten this fact. And the same is true for Transnistria*— a separatist region of Moldova propped up by Russian troops. And the same for Chechnya, where Putin carpet-bombed cities and put thousands in concentration camps in the early 2000’s.[9] Since then, the region has been a police state.

Putin does all of this because he has an ideology. He has a vision of how the world should be. He thinks he is a good person because he is making the world right. It is the ones who are killed and tortured who are enemies, not him. It is they — the Ukrainians, or the liberal Syrians, or the liberal Russians, or the gays — who are upsetting society.
http://www.publicseminar.org/2017/04/putin-may-have-bombed-his-own-metro/#.WTV_4bpFyCo

Putin can never be trusted.
 
The invasion itself — aside from being aggressive, imperialist, et cetera — was a terrorist act because he had the Russian military remove its insignia, thus making their origins unclear. Force by anyone other than a state is terrorism, pure and simple. So when a state’s military pretends to not be from that state as it fights, that is by definition terrorism.
little green men..it was a strategic brilliant move. not "terrorism" ( the article reads like it was written by a Syrian jihadist calling everybody "terrorists"..

No mention of course WHY Putin annexed Crimea..oh no's he a "terrorist" now.
 
little green men..it was a strategic brilliant move. not "terrorism" ( the article reads like it was written by a Syrian jihadist calling everybody "terrorists"..

No mention of course WHY Putin annexed Crimea..oh no's he a "terrorist" now.

... and Putin has never been involved in terrorism, huh?

That's all fake news, huh?

:0) WOW
 
Murderous jihadis, of course, were most people’s default assumption. The St. Petersburg news site Fontanka showed closed-circuit TV images of a bearded Muslim in a skull cap leaving the station, naming him as a prime suspect
so it wasn't an Chechnya/Caucasus region bomber ( metro bombing). WTF is this guy trying to say?
The guy moved to St. Petersburg,but what does that change?

The deeper problem for Russia is that the Islamists of the Caucasus are deeply entwined with the world’s most dangerous dynamo of terrorism, ISIS.
True, but that's not a unique situation

But the problem remained of what to do with these jihadis if and when they come home, now trained and battle-hardened by ISIS.
same problem the west is facing..

The guy seems to conflate internal Putin actions to Syria, to something.."Putin is a terrorist"
OK that's a new one! :palm:
 
I wouldn't put anything past that guy.
Of course you wouldn't, got this all figured out don't you guys.

I thank God every night that I am not a liberal washed into this non stop conspiracy fantasy land.
Such better things to do with your time, ya loon
 
so it wasn't an Chechnya/Caucasus region bomber ( metro bombing). WTF is this guy trying to say?
The guy moved to St. Petersburg,but what does that change?

True, but that's not a unique situation

same problem the west is facing..

The guy seems to conflate internal Putin actions to Syria, to something.."Putin is a terrorist"
OK that's a new one! :palm:

Sorry, that was kinda' stupid.

Connections to Putin and terrorism are irrefutable.
 
... and Putin has never been involved in terrorism, huh?

That's all fake news, huh?

:0) WOW
why don't you define and show "Putin terrorism" for us,and i'll look at what events you mean.
Because the Newsweek article simply shows all of Putin's actions as "terrorist". it's conflated mess.

I mean the Crimean annexation was a "terrorist event?" get the F outta here.
 
Sorry, that was kinda' stupid.

Connections to Putin and terrorism are irrefutable.
is that like "Russian collusion?" ROFL.
.like I said.. you are making the charge so list and explain Putin's terrorism" if you want me to take this seriously
 
Yet a recent investigation conducted by Novaya Gazeta, one of the few independent newspapers left in Russia, complicates this cozy tale of counterterrorist cooperation. Based on extensive fieldwork in one village in the North Caucasus, reporter Elena Milashina has concluded that the “Russian special services have controlled” the flow of jihadists into Syria, where they have lately joined up not only with ISIS but other radical Islamist factions. In other words, Russian officials are adding to the ranks of terrorists which the Russian government has deemed a collective threat to the security and longevity of its dictatorial ally on the Mediterranean, Bashar al-Assad.

It may sound paradoxical—helping the enemy of your friend—but the logic is actually straightforward: Better the terrorists go abroad and fight in Syria than blow things up in Russia. Penetrating and co-opting terrorism also has a long, well-attested history in the annals of Chekist tradecraft.
it's not out of the question -Saudi Arabia did the same thing with it's capitol prisoners.
But i've never seen any confirmation of this by any other source..
 
why don't you define and show "Putin terrorism" for us,and i'll look at what events you mean.
Because the Newsweek article simply shows all of Putin's actions as "terrorist". it's conflated mess.

I mean the Crimean annexation was a "terrorist event?" get the F outta here.

I'm good with Putin as your savior.

I know that it doesn't matter what evidence is posted, presented, documented, analyzed, or said, Putin is still going to be your savior and more 'believable' than your own Intelligence Community .. and I'm good with that.

This is a discussion for the open mind and those who already know of Putin's involvement in terrorism.
 
why don't you define and show "Putin terrorism" for us,and i'll look at what events you mean.


.

they can't "define" it, they spew it. Listen to the Megan Kelly / Putin interview. You get just how ridiculous the liberal media condemnation of Putin is.
He is at heart probably a bad guy, but that's his business. The left suddenly cares? really. Where were they when Hillary and Obama were hitting the reset button with their heads buried in Putins ass?
they don't care, they are just so upset with trump being President, and a good one at that , Putin is their only path to bringing trump down right now. As soon as all of this "investigation" of the meddling fades away intot he nothing it is they will move on to something else.
It's all they got. When's the last time you heard an idea on moving the country forward from a Democrat or a liberal.
trump is Bad is not a policy
 
Goin' off the deep end, huh ?.....Take your meds bac.....relax.....the Russians ain't comin'.....take that to the bank....

:0) According to your US Ambassador to the UN .. the Russians are already here.

U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley Says Russia Was 'Certainly Involved' in 2016 Election
http://time.com/4722229/nikki-haley-thinks-russia-involved-in-election/

Next time try disputing what I posted.

Obama is a Muslim and doesn't have a birth certificate is the deep end.
 
I'm good with Putin as your savior.

I know that it doesn't matter what evidence is posted, presented, documented, analyzed, or said, Putin is still going to be your savior and more 'believable' than your own Intelligence Community .. and I'm good with that.

This is a discussion for the open mind and those who already know of Putin's involvement in terrorism.
what you are good with is Russian hysteria.
I don't know why -it's just anothr way to feed the military industrial establishment - but that's your decision..

I would note that even Obama - who had all kinds of problems with Putin-
would never say he was a "terrorist"or equate Crimea as such.

You have bought 'all in' with the Russiaphobes distortions leading to hysteria
 
Back
Top