I agree its human, not an independent one, my point is that its not a baby. It would be akin to calling a 6 month old baby boy a man... he is simply not a man.
So it is life!
I agree its human, not an independent one, my point is that its not a baby. It would be akin to calling a 6 month old baby boy a man... he is simply not a man.
It's all Science! Biology to be exact!
It's all Science! Biology to be exact!
Not for you because you got the most basic science wrong on this thread.
Did I? Repent beg the Lord to forgive you for all of the babies you had cut out of you!
You are so stupid that you couldn't tell the biological difference between a cat embryo and a human embryo.
So since you lack that basic knowledge, no argument you make is based in science.
You sure did.
I tricked you into thinking a cat embryo was a human embryo to prove that you don't know shit about science or biology.
And it was SO INCREDIBLY EASY to trick you too...all I had to do was post a photo.
Since someone like me can trick you with ease, isn't it possible that everything you believe was just a grift? Because that's what it looks like.
Since someone like me had such an easy time fooling your dumb ass, other people have probably tricked you too.
You're just not a very bright person.
In my defense, I do not go around studying cat embryo, or pig embryos
somehow think it changes the fact of human being in the womb being in a development stage
and you want to kill them up until they mature, you just know that you have been shut down, and are flailing all over because of it!
What kind of defense is that? Seriously.
"I can't be expected to know what I'm talking about".
LOL/
You're someone who is so adamant about the science of "unborn children", yet when that "knowledge" is put to the test, you fail.
The expectation is that you would know what you're fucking talking about; so if you're telling me now that you don't have the requisite knowledge necessary to know the biology of what we're talking about, why are you even making an argument?
You couldn't even properly identify a human fetus, so it does change your argument quite a bit since your argument is clearly devoid of science by your own admission.
You walked right into the trap and now you're digging your own hole deeper.
"mature", "development"...all words used carelessly by someone making a purely emotional, unscientific argument because that's the only lame argument you can make.
You failed the science.
Sigh, you need to get a job and get laid, use protection so you don't have to kill another child, that has to wear on you!
Because the Basic argument is right, life begins at conception!
Conservatives want to turn the clock back to 1953...
Roe v. Wade is first (end legal abortion)
Obergefell v. Hodges is next (end gay marriage)
Griswold v. Connecticut is third (end legal birth control)
Brown v. Board of Education is the ultimate target. (re-institute segregation)
It is not devoid of anything life begins at conception and what is in the womb is a developing Human being!
I'm thinking of an add buy for the fall election campaign.
So it is life!
You're a fucking dupe.
It is remarkably easy to trick you, and I bet it would be remarkably easy to part you with whatever pitiful amount of savings you have left.
All anyone would need to do is get you worked up emotionally in order to sucker you into doing something, saying something, or buying something.