Conservatives think parts of the Constitution are "fake"

Truth Detector said:
There is no way a whiny, triggered, lying little cunt like this was ex military. More likely, a high school dropout. :laugh:
Click to expand...

He's the one that asked a question about constitutionality then said using a legal definition wasn't part of the discussion. Maybe he thinks a thesaurus is the law of the land rather than the Constitution.

Maybe he thinks should the Court take up his question about constitutionality, they'd rely on a thesaurus rather than the legal definition.
 
Truth Detector said:
occupy and reside do not have the same connotation.
Click to expand...

they are synonyms. you were triggered like a snowflake over the use of a word that was used in a perfectly acceptable fashion. I posted enough links, you lost that debate but were not adult enough to say aloud


it would be pointless to further this debate. you are like a child. a triggered child. Why discuss difficult concepts with someone that doesn't grasp or admit to basic things such as what synonyms are and how they work?
 
CFM said:
He's the one that asked a question about constitutionality then said using a legal definition wasn't part of the discussion. Maybe he thinks a thesaurus is the law of the land rather than the Constitution.

Maybe he thinks should the Court take up his question about constitutionality, they'd rely on a thesaurus rather than the legal definition.
Click to expand...

hey idiot - standing armies are no longer unconstitutional as the institutions have turned a blind eye to them anyway

don't confuse me with the moron that claims Incorporation does not matter.

At some point, neither original intent, nor understanding means a damn thing - and that was the point - all you shit stains on both sides have turned the constitution into a meaningless rag for your own political expedience

5-4 decisions because the most brilliant legal minds have no fucking idea how it works anymore. I blame progressives and neocon shit stain assholes such as yourself about equally
 
zymurgy said:
hey idiot - standing armies are no longer unconstitutional as the institutions have turned a blind eye to them anyway

don't confuse me with the moron that claims Incorporation does not matter.

At some point, neither original intent, nor understanding means a damn thing - and that was the point - all you shit stains on both sides have turned the constitution into a meaningless rag for your own political expedience

5-4 decisions because the most brilliant legal minds have no fucking idea how it works anymore. I blame progressives and neocon shit stain assholes such as yourself about equally
Click to expand...

You twisted yourself into a pretzel after being shown that you asked a legal question then ran from the legal definition.

You can blame others all you want. That's the very way a progressive would do it.

I made no effort to confuse you. I didn't have to. You're already confused on your own.
 
CFM said:
You twisted yourself into a pretzel after being shown that you asked a legal question then ran from the legal definition.

You can blame others all you want. That's the very way a progressive would do it.

I made no effort to confuse you. I didn't have to. You're already confused on your own.
Click to expand...

you idiots got triggered over occupy.

don't pretend you were in any other debate here. you pussied up with semantics - and still lost :rofl2:
 
zymurgy said:
they are synonyms. you were triggered like a snowflake over the use of a word that was used in a perfectly acceptable fashion. I posted enough links, you lost that debate but were not adult enough to say aloud
Click to expand...

You're the idiot who is triggered and started hurling nasty insults. Like a loony leftist, you lack self awareness.


zymurgy said:
it would be pointless to further this debate. you are like a child. a triggered child. Why discuss difficult concepts with someone that doesn't grasp or admit to basic things such as what synonyms are and how they work?
Click to expand...

Irony; the guy who got triggered, acting like a child and refuses to debate with any honesty thinks debate is pointless. Yes, with you it certainly is. See a mental health expert. ;)
 
zymurgy said:
you idiots got triggered over occupy.

don't pretend you were in any other debate here. you pussied up with semantics - and still lost :rofl2:
Click to expand...

I'm not the one talking about constitutionality then ignoring a legal definition in favor or a thesaurus.

Don't pretend you're not embarrassed. You should be. You should be used to it.
 
zymurgy said:
you know - that sure doesn't sound like me....

post #39 - check it out.

an adult would apologize (just saying)
Click to expand...

An adult would acknowledge that a legal definition applies when a legal issue is on the table. You obviously aren't an adult since you'd rather use a thesaurus on a legal question after having said legal definitions apply in legal situations
 
CFM said:
It's still funny that he ignored a legal definition in what amounted to a legal question.
Click to expand...


sigh. This is clearly pointless - these idiots argue about synonyms


the legals question is about standing armies. you are just too stupid to realize that though - you couldn't even get past the word occupy like that even fucking mattered :rofl2:

talking about how we permanently reside in 120+ countries is an obvious example of how we have standing armies - and how neocons have no problem "breathing new life" into that clause
 
CFM
Verified User
This message is hidden because CFM is on your ignore list.
Today, 04:29 PM
CFM
Verified User
This message is hidden because CFM is on your ignore list.
Today, 04:32 PM
zymurgy
Verified User
This message is hidden because zymurgy is on your ignore list.
Today, 04:33 PM
CFM
Verified User
This message is hidden because CFM is on your ignore list.
Today, 04:37 PM
zymurgy
Verified User
This message is hidden because zymurgy is on your ignore list.


gigantic pile of horseshit ^^^^
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top