LOL. I guess you don't realize how that actually hurts your case.Stossel isn't the authority, the three academics are. They trolled major academic journals, ones with a radical Leftist bent but academic journals, with phony papers and got them peer reviewed and into those journals no problem at all. James Lindsey is a leading authority on the crap of peer review as it stands today.
![]()
The controversy around hoax studies in critical theory, explained
The “Grievance Studies” or “Sokal Squared” hoax aimed to discredit gender and critical race studies. Did it work?www.vox.com
Following their exposure, academia went into overdrive trying to explain away how they'd been completely taken in a sting operation and justify their existence and their credibility. They're still trying today.
Your argument is that just about anything can get into an academic journal because peer review is so lax.
That means poor arguments and theories can pass peer review.
Her academic papers didn't pass peer review so they must be really bad which only shows how poor her positions are.