Conservative myth of the day

Really? You fucking moron, I've been posting paragraphs of information about the extraction of wealth from our country....not a fucking word. Other than snarky ideological bullshit from your brethren. But because it's YOUR cronies, you sit idly by.... but when I get called a fucking Socialist by those same people and refuse to respond, I'm not ready for prime time?
LOL Oh you have seen nothing yet. Dixie is by far and away the best and most entertaining conservative poster on this board and his rants are TO DIE FOR....I mean not even Rush "Lard Ass" Limbaugh has shit on one of Dixie's rants.


And if he gets under your skin just ask him about 1/3? :)
 
I like how liberalism was once a movement to build up American industry and free markets, but today it is a movement to destroy these things.
Straw man! You're just doing the Fox News tango and demonising those you don't agree with without having any facts to assert your position. Lame 3D...Lame!
 
Straw man! You're just doing the Fox News tango and demonising those you don't agree with without having any facts to assert your position. Lame 3D...Lame!

Not really - most people, including those whiz kids on the FNC, are unaware of what "market liberalism," means. People can often recall that the political meaning of the word has "evolved," but how many leftists out there are really market liberals anymore?
 
Also, Mott, you're the retard who led off with a strawman about 18th Century conservatism (a term not even coined until after 1776 when Edmund Burke published a series of rants about the evils of the French Revolution - the same Burke who opposed Parliament's stand against the colonies and petitioned for an end to hostilities).
 
OH please.....who's being the retard? Like the last 50 years of the Republican party haven't existed! Derp, derp! It's funny how you can't list a single fact contradicting those I posted, not one! :)
What facts? You're trying to equate the modern conservative movement with the past sins of Democrats. This is a huge fail for you.

Let me demonstrate by axing you a question.

Which political movement more closely represents the Founder's vision of limited government, today's liberals, or today's conservatives?
 
Who equates Keynes to Socialism?

Yeah, I was kind of wandering that myself. Nixon's famous declaration that "we're all Keynesians now," should be a reminder to Mott that we don't think it is akin to socialism, but merely linked to the kind of asshole who would implement price control measures.
 
You ignorant fuck....you guys just can't stop with the rhetoric can you? You guys are like a doll baby that kids pull a string and the baby says "mama", but instead, you pull your own string and you say "envy", "self pity", "entitlement" and the like. How is anyone supposed to have dialogue and rationally debate items when all people care about is ideology and rhetoric?

I don't know, you tell me? You are obviously hung up on failed Socialist Marxist ideology that doesn't work, and it doesn't seem to matter how much this is pointed out. You continue to come here and post propaganda to support Marxism and Maoism, at the expense of Capitalism and Free Markets, and refuse to acknowledge anything said in defense of Capitalism and Free Markets, so you tell me... how are we supposed to have a reasonable conversation with you?

Stop taking right wing media at face value. Stop thinking that government is the only problem with this country. Stop thinking that big multinationals want a free market and competition. Start thinking that perhaps....just perhaps...that they are also detrimental to our economy. Start thinking that they are working the system and costing us more than ALL the welfare queens combined possibly could.

I'm sorry dude...this shit goes way deeper than liberal vs. Conservative.

The media is decidedly left wing. Government is one of our biggest problems, specifically out of control government spending and debt that even our great gandkids can't repay. Multinationals certainly do support free markets, and no capitalist ever wants competition. I can't think they are detrimental to the economy or working the system and costing us more, because that isn't true. That's the Marxist and Maoist propaganda making you think that. Whenever a capitalist experiences this dreaded and awful thing called "record profits" it means they were successful at providing some product or service that people demanded.

And yes, it goes way deeper than liberal vs. conservative, because Liberalism has been hijacked by Marxists and Maoists.
 
I don't know, you tell me? You are obviously hung up on failed Socialist Marxist ideology that doesn't work, and it doesn't seem to matter how much this is pointed out. You continue to come here and post propaganda to support Marxism and Maoism, at the expense of Capitalism and Free Markets, and refuse to acknowledge anything said in defense of Capitalism and Free Markets, so you tell me... how are we supposed to have a reasonable conversation with you?



The media is decidedly left wing. Government is one of our biggest problems, specifically out of control government spending and debt that even our great gandkids can't repay. Multinationals certainly do support free markets, and no capitalist ever wants competition. I can't think they are detrimental to the economy or working the system and costing us more, because that isn't true. That's the Marxist and Maoist propaganda making you think that. Whenever a capitalist experiences this dreaded and awful thing called "record profits" it means they were successful at providing some product or service that people demanded.

And yes, it goes way deeper than liberal vs. conservative, because Liberalism has been hijacked by Marxists and Maoists.

Keep pulling that string chatty Cathy.
 
Keep pulling that string chatty Cathy.

Yes, I will keep completely PWNING you in the arena of debate, and relegating you to hurling ad homs and insults.

Like I said, I don't think you're ready for prime time here, I think you need to return to making snarky comments on facebook pages. You obviously lack the intellectual tools to argue your points, and people here aren't buying your propaganda links.
 
Yes, I will keep completely PWNING you in the arena of debate, and relegating you to hurling ad homs and insults.

Like I said, I don't think you're ready for prime time here, I think you need to return to making snarky comments on facebook pages. You obviously lack the intellectual tools to argue your points, and people here aren't buying your propaganda links.

"Pwning"? You call me not ready for prime time, and you use stupid fucking idioms such as this? Let me guess... you call pot 4:20 too.

You have not "OWNED" anyone....you just keep talking your bullshit right wing talking points. No one is buying your bullshit. You can scream "socialist" all you want to Dixie...that's the only tool you have, because that's the only tool your handlers give you.
 
"Pwning"? You call me not ready for prime time, and you use stupid fucking idioms such as this? Let me guess... you call pot 4:20 too.

You have not "OWNED" anyone....you just keep talking your bullshit right wing talking points. No one is buying your bullshit. You can scream "socialist" all you want to Dixie...that's the only tool you have, because that's the only tool your handlers give you.

No, I usually call pot "smoke" or "weed" or "kush" or "hydro" and 4:20 is what time I smoke it. I don't own people because I don't believe in owning people, but if I did, I would certainly want to own someone smarter than you.

I didn't talk bullshit, I didn't scream "socialist" ..it was YOU who posted the thread about "free market socialism" and I simply explained to you why socialist systems fail. You then tried to claim I was talking about "Keynesian statism" or anything besides socialism, but I only addressed the basic fundamentals of every socialist system. You've never posted anything to support your opinions, while I have presented the historical record of socialism and it's many failures. And now you have gone into "attack" mode, where all you know how to do is call me names and throw insults at me.

Of all the morons I have thoroughly PWNED here, you are among the easiest.
 
No, I usually call pot "smoke" or "weed" or "kush" or "hydro" and 4:20 is what time I smoke it. I don't own people because I don't believe in owning people, but if I did, I would certainly want to own someone smarter than you.

I didn't talk bullshit, I didn't scream "socialist" ..it was YOU who posted the thread about "free market socialism" and I simply explained to you why socialist systems fail. You then tried to claim I was talking about "Keynesian statism" or anything besides socialism, but I only addressed the basic fundamentals of every socialist system. You've never posted anything to support your opinions, while I have presented the historical record of socialism and it's many failures. And now you have gone into "attack" mode, where all you know how to do is call me names and throw insults at me.

Of all the morons I have thoroughly PWNED here, you are among the easiest.

Please remind my where I talked about "free market socialism". I talked about not having a free market at all, but a rigged market. A market that is being helped with funding with our tax dollars.

EDIT: just guessing that you must go through a hell of a lot of weed.
 
Back
Top