we need one for our operations in Ukraine as well
We do not have military operations in Ukraine, but if we ever did, you could start talking about a AUMF.
we need one for our operations in Ukraine as well
Putin already know
The American people dont get much coverage of the overwhelming US role in the war.
The public needs to know this is not just selling weapons to Ukraine
providing training for Uk drone operators after the war started is not "funding"
Congress should also debate and take action against the following un-American and un-Constitutional tRump atrocity among many at condemning tRump as a demonstrated criminal against humanity, and at using that illegitimate office to carry out his tyrannical crimes against humanity too:
Former defense secretary says Trump proposed bombing Mexico
New Day
In his new book, former Defense Secretary Mark Esper says then-President Donald Trump proposed launching missiles into Mexico to destroy the drug labs in 2020. CNN political analyst Maggie Haberman has more.
Source: CNN"
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics...ump-bomb-mexico-drugs-haberman-newday-vpx.cnn

I guess you can try to make a law against giving intelligence to Ukraine, even for the President. It is not a law right now, and it would be tough to make it a law. Even if Republicans control both houses of Congress, I doubt they would have enough to override a filibuster or a veto. I even doubt they would have the will to be that publicly in support of Putin.
I guess you will have to wait until 2025, and hope that trump wins in 2024. At that point, trump could help out Putin.
Why is it so important to Republicans that Putin wins in his invasion of Ukraine?
You're right, it's not a law but it is intelligence related so the dissemination of said intelligence is still regulated.
The Chinese are celebrating...
...well, the rulers are, anyway
Damn Chinese and their disease.
China is shutting down extremely. They are looking at their first modern recession... EVER!!! People are openly rioting for the first time in 30+ years. This is extremely bad for China.
we do not have personnel . we very much do have military support operations and logisticsWe do not have military operations in Ukraine, but if we ever did, you could start talking about a AUMF.
It's their own fault.
we do not have personnel . we very much do have military support operations and logistics
For the most part, if the President orders its release to another government, it is legal to release it. Congress has allowed to executive branch to decide what is secret, and who to release it to. The President is the head of the executive branch, so has the final authority on that. Congress has set the penalties for violating the executive branches orders.
None of us considered a situation like trump, where he was betraying spies to Putin. We had no laws in place to handle a President who betrayed us to our enemies.
that would require using a proxy for a proxy war ..lolThen sell them to someone else and let them send the weapons to Ukraine and shut the hell up about it.
I don't want us to get into a war with Russia. If we do, you and I both know it'll be a nuclear war. That would not be good.
we do not have personnel . we very much do have military support operations and logistics
the scale of magnitude make the comparison absurd.As long as our actual involvement ends at the border, it is better than the Russians, and Chinese did. Russian ships would go right into Hanoi Harbor. Chinese trains with Chinese crews would ride over the border into North Vietnam.