Congratulations, you took freedom away…

Yep. If Thomas gets his way there will be cameras in your bedrooms. Christians love to legislate morality and there is no check on them now. Welcome to the white male christian theocracy once known as the United States. The irony is that they are going to install the most un Christian person to lead.

your strawman caught fire and burned down your house.......that's what you get for building such a big, fucking strawman.......
 
If I don’t own my whole body


Then men should not own their own body
You didn't answer the question about sperm destruction....But you did admit that a miscarriage is the loss of a child...for "some"...is that only for Republican women?
 
Had the radical left not tried to push the limits of abortion so far they wouldn't have had as much pushback from the right.

You got it by cheating in elections and withholding legal powers of the president idiot



You cheated this into life



Now your whole party will die
 
You didn't answer the question about sperm destruction....But you did admit that a miscarriage is the loss of a child...for "some"...is that only for Republican women?

The woman who chooses to be pregnant


The one that didn’t want to be pregnant doesn’t mourn



Hand your beans over to the government

Fair is fair
 
Hello Shoresy,

Nope and this is not a religious issue it is an issue of science we now know that after conception a unique individual with unique DNA is formed and all the genetic building blocks that will ever make up that person for the rest of their lives is already contained within at the moment of conception, that's science deal with it.

It is a huge religious issue.

It is also well studied in science.

It can be both.

Unique DNA happens all the time. Most of it never makes it to adulthood.

There is nothing unique about human DNA. DNA is in all life.

An ant has DNA. We murder them by the millions.

A human at the point of conception is one cell.

It is absurd that this single cell should prevail over the host being in a legal sense. The host being can produce more cells. The host being has the ability to consider the repercussions of the decision of whether to continue to be the host being or to halt that process before it turns into a life-altering lifetime obligation. The single cell zygote can't even think. It has no brain. It doesn't even have a sex. It is next to nothing.

The question then becomes how far along should the zygote / embryo / fetus go before we as a society say it is wrong/illegal to abort it. At the beginning, it should logically be the decision of the host being over a single cell. At the point of birth, it becomes murder to kill another separate individual human. But up until birth, it is part of the host being.

If the health of the host being or the fetus is threatened, a medical intervention is obviously warranted.

If the fetus cannot possibly survive outside of the host being, it is still logical that the host being should prevail in the decision to continue or not.

It only becomes less justifiable to allow that if things have progressed too far.
 
The woman who chooses to be pregnant


The one that didn’t want to be pregnant doesn’t mourn



Hand your beans over to the government

Fair is fair
Well, there it is....So an unborn child only if you want the baby...Otherwise, clump of cells...
 
Republicans have said out loud that the justices lied to them in their under oath testimony



IMPEACHMENT!
 
Back
Top