Your definitions are based on nothing more than knee jerk reactionary bullshit. Libertarians do not change positions simply because Democrats or Republicans may agree with us.
But apparently you do, because you are now claiming Libertarians stand up for Liberal causes and fight for Liberal agenda items and adopt Liberal talking points about those agenda items. You've abandoned your principles about keeping government out of our lives, in favor of government telling us what is and isn't morally acceptable and what we can and can't do, and who can and can't do it. Those are Liberal memes, and have nothing to do with Libertarianism, or at least not the Libertarianism I am familiar with through extensive reading of Libertarians most prominent in 20th Century American politics.
Again, knee jerk reactionary bullshit.
AGAIN... an ad hom that proves I nailed your ass. I'm getting good at this!
The proper role of a just government is to protect the rights of individuals not just some increasingly small collective that you call citizens. Of course, the government is going to give some urgency to it's own citizens. But part of the trick of racists assholes like you is to increasingly exclude certain members of the community from the definition of citizen. Enfranchisement, after all, was a liberal cause.
Again, you are endorsing a Liberal Statist philosophy here. You have no problem with massive Federal government as long as it is devoted to fighting Liberal battles and promoting those values. I'm not a racist and haven't excluded anyone from anything, I just don't feel it is the federal government's right to tell me what I can and can't do or what is or isn't morally acceptable.
Bullshit. I have come to realize that lying sacks of shit like you, misuse this argument. The government will always be involved in marriage just as it is involved in any contractual agreement. But its involvement should not be any greater than that.
Right, but if it's involvement is not greater than what you stated, how can it "redefine" what marriage means and dictate that? Again, you are an activist fanatical LIBERAL, not a Libertarian. You don't believe in individual personal liberty, you believe in forcing a LIBERAL ideology upon the rest of society against its will, and making them live by LIBERAL standards. That's simply NOT Libertarian in any way.
No one is forcing you to accept anything.
Yes, you are trying to. And insidiously hiding behind "Libertarianism" to do so!
You spend so much time in spin mode and lying I think you are nuts and not really aware of what the truth is anymore.
Haven't spun one single thing in this entire thread. I just keep clocking your ass, and you keep hurling ad homs to prove it.
Libertarians don't seperate issues based on your knee jerk partisan bullshit. It's not about the government supporting a "liberal" cause or a "conservative" one. It's about individual rights vs the rights of the collective or state. You are firmly on the side of collectivism and the power of the state. You are not a libertarian at all. You are a racist piece of shit that is afraid to admit what you truly are.
Oh I know Libertarians don't separate issues based on knee jerk partisan bullshit, Liberals do... that's why I say you are a LIBERAL!
Your position has nothing to do with individual liberty and freedom, and everything to do with manipulating the language and trying to fool people into accepting radical Liberal government, instituting radical Liberal ideology, under the premise it is something other than radical fanatical Liberalism.
I'm on the side of individual freedom and liberty, and greatly reduced federal interference in our lives. I am not an anarchist, I believe society has to establish laws and rules to function in a civilized manner, and I think a part of individual liberty is our ability to vote and implement our own rules and laws at the state or community level, and the federal government needs to stay the hell out of it and allow that freedom. I don't favor 9 judges in black robes, enacting laws from the bench, that is not Libertarian by any stretch of the imagination, in my opinion. I don't care that it's supposedly done in the name of liberty, it's built on false assumptions and liberal propaganda, and it's just as fucking wrong as endorsing a federal government to impose right-wing religious zealotry on the people.
AGAIN... YOU are a LIBERAL, not a Libertarian! You continue to prove this for everyone to see, in every post you're making.
