Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots

archives said:
Offer us documented proof that one, just one, election was decided incorrectly due to voter fraud, just one. Got to be thousands of elections conducted each year in America, so give us one

Can you guess the “proof” he’ll ^ offer? Either, “you are a Moran,” “you dumb ……..,” or something similar

NEXT
Click to expand...

There is a Trump 'election fraud' lawyer just leaving court for case #61 now. I got his transcript of media comments before and after the case and also his in Court statements.


Trump lawyer to media before case - 'This is clear provable fraud. The evidence is undeniable'.

Trump lawyer in court - 'No your honor, we are not here to claim fraud'.

Trump lawyer after court to media - 'these Librul courts would not allow us to share our clear and provable fraud'.


Trump derps swallow it while sending Trump money.
 
Nordberg said:
In fact, there cannot be overvotes. If you bother to vote, you will see your name is looked up in the precinct book and when your ID and signature are verified, you are given a ballot. Once you vote, you are marked as voted. If you try to vote again, it fails. If you try another precinct, you will not be in the book, Mail-in is done the same way. The ballot is directed to the precinct on the envelope where it goes through the same procedures.
Why Repubs want to destroy the country with lies?
There are some powerful forces behind the effort to make people think our system is corrupt. Trump spearheaded it and still does. They want to fundamentally change the country, ending the 250-year-old experiment. What they see in place of it is scary. They are certainly not trying to spread the wealth and power.
Click to expand...
You can repeat this every day, and they still won't understand.

There was voter fraud committed by Republicans who sent in ballots for their dead relatives, but not that many
 
archives said:
So you can’t, you can’t give us documented proof that one, just one, election was decided incorrectly due to voter fraud, just one. Got to be thousands of elections conducted each year in America, and you can’t give us one. Your done

NEXT
Click to expand...


For the brain dead dumbass:

It isn’t just Republicans who believe this cheating occurred. Even 34% of Democrats believe it, as do 38% of those who “somewhat” support President Biden. A broad range of Americans think this: men, women, all age groups, whites, those who are neither white nor black, Republicans, those who are neither Republicans nor Democrats, all job categories, all income groups except those making over $200,000 per year, and all education groups except those who attended graduate school.

And with good reason. New research of mine is forthcoming in the peer-reviewed economics journal Public Choice, and it finds evidence of around 255,000 excess votes (possibly as many as 368,000) for Joe Biden in six swing states where Donald Trump lodged accusations of fraud. Biden only carried these states – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – by a total of 313,253 votes. Excluding Michigan, the gap was 159,065.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...nds_evidence_of_2020_voter_fraud_147378.html#!

No voter fraud? How about 1,334 cases, 1,147 convictions
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...fraud-how-about-1-334-cases-1-147-convictions

Much of the following evidence is dismissed by the Democrats and their media allies — if they even address any of it at all — as just a “conspiracy theory,” which is, of course, not an argument but rather a talking point. It seems that most of those who did not want Donald Trump to be reelected argue “there is nothing to see here,” while the majority of Trump voters believe there is a whole lot to “see here.”

There is much about the election that makes little sense. The Republican Party gained seats in the House, and increased the number of state legislatures that they control, yet their presidential candidate supposedly lost. It is the first time in American history that an incumbent president gained votes (15 million more votes than Obama got in 2012!) and lost — if he did. President Barack Obama actually received three and a half million fewer votes in 2012 than in 2008, yet won reelection. Biden won only 524 counties across the country, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008, yet supposedly Biden got more votes than Obama. Significantly, in Ohio, a state that recently instituted strong election fraud measures, Trump won by eight percentage points! In contrast, in other midwestern states such as Michigan and Wisconsin that lacked these anti-fraud safeguards, Trump lost.

Trump won a larger percentage of the African-American vote than any Republican candidate in 60 years, and a huge increase in the percentage of Hispanic votes. His rallies were filled to capacity, despite concerns over the Chinese COVID virus. Biden, on the other hand, barely campaigned, and his campaign events were sparsely attended.

Moreover, Patrick Basham, the founding director of the pollster group Democracy Institute, added to the ever-growing list of election abnormalities and statistical improbabilities. He said that the election went flat-out against “non-polling metrics” that have a perfect record of predicting the outcome of an election, until now. Those metrics include party registrations trends; the candidates’ respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social-media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate.
 
America said:
Cool story.
Click to expand...

It's a fact halfwit.

The witness requirement was waived for the primary in South Carolina, and a federal judge ruled on Friday that it will not be required for the general election either, citing how severe the pandemic is as the reasoning.

In the three "Blue Wall" states the president won in 2016 -- Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin -- judges have recently issued rulings that extend the deadline for mail ballots to be received.

In Michigan, a court of claims judge ordered clerks to accept ballots that are postmarked by Nov. 2 and received within 14 days of the election, the deadline for results to be certified. These ballots have to be counted as provisional ballots. In Wisconsin, a U.S. district judge ruled that ballots postmarked by Nov. 3 can be counted as long as they are received by Nov. 9. And in Pennsylvania, not only will mailed ballots that are postmarked on or before 8 p.m. on Election Day and received by 5 p.m. the Friday after it be counted, due to a ruling from the state Supreme Court, but any ballots that arrive within that time frame without a postmark, or with an unreadable postmark, will be presumed to have been sent before the cutoff point, unless evidence indicates otherwise.

In Georgia, a federal judge ruled that ballots postmarked by Election Day will count if election officials get them by the third day after the election, but the secretary of state, the Republican National Committee and the Georgia Republican Party are challenging this order in court.

Pennsylvania utilized drop boxes for its primary. While the Trump campaign sued to prevent counties from using them, alleging that the way counties implemented these -- bypassing the state legislature to do it -- was unconstitutional, the state Supreme Court ruled that these are legal, writing in the ruling that "Election Code should be interpreted to allow county boards of election to accept hand-delivered mail-in ballots at locations other than their office addresses including drop-boxes."

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sta...g-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/story?id=72309089
 
Truth Detector said:
It's a fact halfwit.

The witness requirement was waived for the primary in South Carolina, and a federal judge ruled on Friday that it will not be required for the general election either, citing how severe the pandemic is as the reasoning.

In the three "Blue Wall" states the president won in 2016 -- Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin -- judges have recently issued rulings that extend the deadline for mail ballots to be received.

In Michigan, a court of claims judge ordered clerks to accept ballots that are postmarked by Nov. 2 and received within 14 days of the election, the deadline for results to be certified. These ballots have to be counted as provisional ballots. In Wisconsin, a U.S. district judge ruled that ballots postmarked by Nov. 3 can be counted as long as they are received by Nov. 9. And in Pennsylvania, not only will mailed ballots that are postmarked on or before 8 p.m. on Election Day and received by 5 p.m. the Friday after it be counted, due to a ruling from the state Supreme Court, but any ballots that arrive within that time frame without a postmark, or with an unreadable postmark, will be presumed to have been sent before the cutoff point, unless evidence indicates otherwise.

In Georgia, a federal judge ruled that ballots postmarked by Election Day will count if election officials get them by the third day after the election, but the secretary of state, the Republican National Committee and the Georgia Republican Party are challenging this order in court.

Pennsylvania utilized drop boxes for its primary. While the Trump campaign sued to prevent counties from using them, alleging that the way counties implemented these -- bypassing the state legislature to do it -- was unconstitutional, the state Supreme Court ruled that these are legal, writing in the ruling that "Election Code should be interpreted to allow county boards of election to accept hand-delivered mail-in ballots at locations other than their office addresses including drop-boxes."

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sta...g-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/story?id=72309089
Click to expand...

That's nice, dear.
 
Truth Detector said:
Lie and lame. Democrats were saying it in '16. Trump saw it coming in '20 with the Covid Hoax which gave cover for massive voter ballot fraud.
Click to expand...

Everybody saw it coming. They did it in everybody's faces, and seeing Democrats post "Our Democracy" is the epitome of retardation.

Disenfranchising voters is not Democracy. Democrats disenfranchise their own voters in their own primaries, why wouldn't they try to rig a national election too?
 
Matt Dillon said:
Everybody saw it coming. They did it in everybody's faces, and seeing Democrats post "Our Democracy" is the epitome of retardation.

Disenfranchising voters is not Democracy. Democrats disenfranchise their own voters in their own primaries, why wouldn't they try to rig a national election too?
Click to expand...

Disenfranchising is exactly what the shitty GOP gerrymandered districts do, and exactly what Trump and his flock of stooges tried to do. Without proof or evidence of fraud, they attempted to dictate the outcome of the election thereby rendering millions of votes pointless.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
Disenfranchising is exactly what the shitty GOP gerrymandered districts do, and exactly what Trump and his flock of stooges tried to do. Without proof or evidence of fraud, they attempted to dictate the outcome of the election thereby rendering millions of votes pointless.
Click to expand...

Gerrymandering is done by both parties.

Get real, Democrats are always trying to cheat any way they can. What their latest schtick?

Oh yeah! Trying to have Trump removed from the ballots in states. Seems like they're scared to death of any competition to me.

Silencing opposing opinions and cheating elections is NOT liberal or Democratic. :rolleyes:
 
Matt Dillon said:
Gerrymandering is done by both parties.

Get real, Democrats are always trying to cheat any way they can. What their latest schtick?

Oh yeah! Trying to have Trump removed from the ballots in states. Seems like they're scared to death of any competition to me.

Silencing opposing opinions and cheating elections is NOT liberal or Democratic. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Gee why would we ever want to prevent another coup attempt?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top