Confederate flags are banned from CMA country music festival, officials announce

Celticguy said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
No chuckles, it was a precursor to deadly violence, as history tells...Just like the Nazi swastika. Or maybe you missed the 1976 pic of the yahoo trying to impale the brother in Boston with the American flag?
Click to expand...


you mean flag pole
Click to expand...

Oh puh-leeze! Was the flag pole barren? NO! Which is why it caused such a stir globally, because many have always contended the American flag isn't always a symbol of peace and salvation and justice ... but of what that photo depicted.

No need for a one in a million photo where the Confederate flag shows up....violence advocated and/or done against black folk has been historically synonymous to it.


When was the last time any group of people hoisted an empty flag pole as a symbol for their country or politics or beliefs?

You're REALLY grasping at straws, chuckles. The CMA has grown up and moved on...and you just can't stand it. Poor baby, go cry in your beer with your sheet wearing brethren.
 
Taichiliberal said:
No chuckles, it was a precursor to deadly violence, as history tells...Just like the Nazi swastika. Or maybe you missed the 1976 pic of the yahoo trying to impale the brother in Boston with the American flag?
Click to expand...

Those flags are seen so rarely that it makes national news when one shows up in public.

The Confederate flag was fairly benign for many decades. Even Hollywood white lib Dems used it as a symbol of rowdy fun in series like the Dukes of Hazard, and in fashion.

The name "Democrat Party" is a symbol of slavery, racism and insurrection. It should have been banned 150 years ago.

The democrat party has destroyed the traditional Black family, attacks their religious faith, traps Blacks in Dem ghettos, and still denies poor Black children a real education with the white lib ban on school choice.
 
Bigdog said:
Those flags are seen so rarely that it makes national news when one shows up in public.

The Confederate flag was fairly benign for many decades. Even Hollywood white lib Dems used it as a symbol of rowdy fun in series like the Dukes of Hazard, and in fashion.

The name "Democrat Party" is a symbol of slavery, racism and insurrection. It should have been banned 150 years ago.

The democrat party has destroyed the traditional Black family, attacks their religious faith, traps Blacks in Dem ghettos, and still denies poor Black children a real education with the white lib ban on school choice.
Click to expand...

And they vote D because of Stockholm Syndrome some say.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Now I don't believe in the "sins of the father" crap, so I strongly disagree with Guno on this point.

But I'm confused as to how you equate former black slaves as "traitors". Elucidate, please.
Click to expand...

I didn't equate former black slaves as "traitors". Try reading for comprehension. He (albeit with an inability to spell), said that we should erase the descendants of traitors. Which would include a bunch of black people, given that many slave owners had children with their slaves.
 
Gondwanaland said:
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Now I don't believe in the "sins of the father" crap, so I strongly disagree with Guno on this point.

But I'm confused as to how you equate former black slaves as "traitors". Elucidate, please.
Click to expand...




I didn't equate former black slaves as "traitors". Try reading for comprehension. He (albeit with an inability to spell), said that we should erase the descendants of traitors. Which would include a bunch of black people, given that many slave owners had children with their slaves.
Click to expand...

First off, when you try to be condescending, you should be able to establish a point of superiority in the exchange. Now all one has to do is follow the chronology of the posts to see that you initially DID NOT FULLY EXPLAIN TO THE READING AUDIENCE HOW YOU EQUATE SLAVES AS TRAITORS.

I'll dumb it down for you:

In this latest response you make the distinction of children of slave owners and slaves with that of the slaves who were not raped or forced into a sexual relationship with the slave owner.

But

Once you do this, you would have to document where these (slave owner) kids were elevated to the same stature as the slave owner, and perpetuated his legacy. If not, then one would have to conclude that these "illegitimate" kids were treated as the rest of the slaves.....non-human property.

Mind you, there were A FEW documented freed blacks who owned slaves, so they would fit the criteria of eradication that Guno proposed....they were far less that 1% of all slave owners in American history, but they were there.

So if you specifically referred to that less than 1%, you'd be correct in your question. But since you DID NOT ORIGINALLY DO THIS, my question was quite legitimate.

I hope this gets you up to speed. Carry on.
 
Bigdog said:
The Confederate flag was fairly benign for many decades. Even Hollywood white lib Dems used it as a symbol of rowdy fun in series like the Dukes of Hazard, and in fashion.
Click to expand...

cancel culture.1610 project. or what I call our very own Cultural Revolution

After the Gang of 4 came to prominence during the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) and were later charged with a series of treasonous crimes.- China learned it had to make great leaps in real progress
not just Maoist ideology of forced collectives and dunce caps.

As a result China quickly rose to be a world power, and you know the rest.
But our Maoists/ Socialists/ BLM/ whatever only know how to tear down the culture
and progressives want chaos by defunding the police.

IOW China was smart and learned from it's mistake, we are dumb and unable to plan our future.
The patient- Uncle Sam- is now critical. The populace knows it, but i dont think DC is up to the job
of solving our problems..they make it worse if anything
 
dukkha said:
cancel culture.1610 project. or what I call our very own Cultural Revolution

After the Gang of 4 came to prominence during the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) and were later charged with a series of treasonous crimes.- China learned it had to make great leaps in real progress
not just Maoist ideology of forced collectives and dunce caps.

As a result China quickly rose to be a world power, and you know the rest.
But our Maoists/ Socialists/ BLM/ whatever only know how to tear down the culture
and progressives want chaos by defunding the police.

IOW China was smart and learned from it's mistake, we are dumb and unable to plan our future.
The patient- Uncle Sam- is now critical. The populace knows it, but i dont think DC is up to the job
of solving our problems..they make it worse if anything
Click to expand...

"Fairly Benign" to whom?

https://renegadesouth.wordpress.com...ory-and-the-debate-over-the-confederate-flag/

https://www.npr.org/sections/itsall...ted-political-history-of-the-confederate-flag

As for the Dukes of Hazzard www.usatoday.com/story/life/tv/2015...ukes-of-hazzard-yanked-from-tv-land/29571785/

You two clowns seem to take your personal opinions as bonafide fact, then you run with it.

But true history and ALL the facts will always be your undoing.
 
Years ago, it was rare to see a Confederate flag flying around here up North.
That has changed recently. I see many on flag poles under the American Stars & Stripes.
It has become a symbol of resistance to the left and everything (unAmerican) they stand
for. The left knows this, that's why they are pissing their pants when they see a Confederate
flag.
 
Taichiliberal said:
No chuckles, it was a precursor to deadly violence, as history tells...Just like the Nazi swastika. Or maybe you missed the 1976 pic of the yahoo trying to impale the brother in Boston with the American flag?

The CMA recognized that for generations the symbol of the Confederacy was a sign of threatened violence against black folk...a matter of fact & history whether you acknowledge it or not. Given the rise of that flag's use at various white supremacist/neo-nazi/klan rallies/marches/protests were they provoked/instigated violence, and that non-white folk were getting more recognition in the country western music field, the CMA chose NOT to give the okey-doke to the aforementioned cretins.

Your last sentence comes off like some drunken simpleton trying to justify racist rhetoric. Not surprising. Carry on.
Click to expand...

That's why they want it They know what it means now, hate. It's a "warning" to those dirty Jews and Negros, and Spics, coming to replace their racist asses.

Rednecks are so evil and stupid.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Oh puh-leeze! Was the flag pole barren? NO! Which is why it caused such a stir globally, because many have always contended the American flag isn't always a symbol of peace and salvation and justice ... but of what that photo depicted.

No need for a one in a million photo where the Confederate flag shows up....violence advocated and/or done against black folk has been historically synonymous to it.


When was the last time any group of people hoisted an empty flag pole as a symbol for their country or politics or beliefs?

You're REALLY grasping at straws, chuckles. The CMA has grown up and moved on...and you just can't stand it. Poor baby, go cry in your beer with your sheet wearing brethren.
Click to expand...

You see? Now they're accusing you of lying because they beat the cops with the OTHER end of their Nazi flags. Shame on you :)
 
Taichiliberal said:
First off, when you try to be condescending, you should be able to establish a point of superiority in the exchange. Now all one has to do is follow the chronology of the posts to see that you initially DID NOT FULLY EXPLAIN TO THE READING AUDIENCE HOW YOU EQUATE SLAVES AS TRAITORS.

I'll dumb it down for you:

In this latest response you make the distinction of children of slave owners and slaves with that of the slaves who were not raped or forced into a sexual relationship with the slave owner.

But

Once you do this, you would have to document where these (slave owner) kids were elevated to the same stature as the slave owner, and perpetuated his legacy. If not, then one would have to conclude that these "illegitimate" kids were treated as the rest of the slaves.....non-human property.

Mind you, there were A FEW documented freed blacks who owned slaves, so they would fit the criteria of eradication that Guno proposed....they were far less that 1% of all slave owners in American history, but they were there.

So if you specifically referred to that less than 1%, you'd be correct in your question. But since you DID NOT ORIGINALLY DO THIS, my question was quite legitimate.

I hope this gets you up to speed. Carry on.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry you have trouble with your basic reading skills. I never equated slaves to traitors. That was your deranged mind.
 
Gondwanaland said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
First off, when you try to be condescending, you should be able to establish a point of superiority in the exchange. Now all one has to do is follow the chronology of the posts to see that you initially DID NOT FULLY EXPLAIN TO THE READING AUDIENCE HOW YOU EQUATE SLAVES AS TRAITORS.

I'll dumb it down for you:

In this latest response you make the distinction of children of slave owners and slaves with that of the slaves who were not raped or forced into a sexual relationship with the slave owner.

But

Once you do this, you would have to document where these (slave owner) kids were elevated to the same stature as the slave owner, and perpetuated his legacy. If not, then one would have to conclude that these "illegitimate" kids were treated as the rest of the slaves.....non-human property.

Mind you, there were A FEW documented freed blacks who owned slaves, so they would fit the criteria of eradication that Guno proposed....they were far less that 1% of all slave owners in American history, but they were there.

So if you specifically referred to that less than 1%, you'd be correct in your question. But since you DID NOT ORIGINALLY DO THIS, my question was quite legitimate.

I hope this gets you up to speed. Carry on.
Click to expand...


I'm sorry you have trouble with your basic reading skills. I never equated slaves to traitors. That was your deranged mind.
Click to expand...

Now you're just being stubborn to the point of insipidness. All one has to do is follow the chronology of the posts to see that...Post #83 show your basic statement....pretty generalized and a tad questionable given Guno's statements previous to that. My follow up responses put the kibosh on your lame attempt to salvage your absurd statement.

You'd have to be either deranged or just plain stupid if you think this crap of yours convinces anyone but the guy you see in the mirror.
 
Last edited:
Taichiliberal said:
Now you're just being stubborn to the point of insipidness. All one has to do is follow the chronology of the posts to see that...Post #83 show your basic statement....pretty generalized and a tad questionable given Guno's statements previous to that. My follow up responses put the kibosh on your lame attempt to salvage your absurd statement.

You'd have to be either deranged or just plain stupid if you think this crap of yours convinces anyone but the guy you see in the mirror.
Click to expand...

Quote where I said slaves were traitors, you dumb cunt. Put up or shut up, twatface.
 
Gondwanaland said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Now you're just being stubborn to the point of insipidness. All one has to do is follow the chronology of the posts to see that...Post #83 show your basic statement....pretty generalized and a tad questionable given Guno's statements previous to that. My follow up responses put the kibosh on your lame attempt to salvage your absurd statement.

You'd have to be either deranged or just plain stupid if you think this crap of yours convinces anyone but the guy you see in the mirror.
Click to expand...


Quote where I said slaves were traitors, you dumb cunt. Put up or shut up, twatface.
Click to expand...

Your childish name calling belies your repetitive challenged that was already addressed in the chronology of the posts. My response above settles this, your insipid stubbornness non-withstanding.

Now what you will do is just ignore what has transpired and :bdh: Go for it.

The OP shows that the CMA officials finally had their "come to Jesus" moment. Pity YOU and your like minded brethren refuse to.
 
RB 60 said:
Years ago, it was rare to see a Confederate flag flying around here up North.
That has changed recently. I see many on flag poles under the American Stars & Stripes.
It has become a symbol of resistance to the left and everything (unAmerican) they stand
for. The left knows this, that's why they are pissing their pants when they see a Confederate
flag.
Click to expand...

Which is part of why it is not allowed. The other part is that Southern culture must go away, it is a problem for the WOKE Revolution which is so clearly out to destroy America.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top