Concealed carry gun-wielder intervenes in domestic dispute and is shot dead

Lumberjack

Come get some
‘He thought he could help’: Concealed carry gun-wielder intervenes in domestic dispute and is shot dead

The concealed carry permit holder was trying to intervene in a domestic dispute, trying to disarm the fleeing shooter, trying to do the job ordinarily reserved for police.

Instead, he was killed.

Just before noon on Monday, 35-year-old T.J. Antell, who had served in the Marines, watched the unfolding of a domestic dispute between a man and a woman outside a Walgreens in Arlington, Texas, authorities said. The man, a soldier stationed at Fort Hood, allegedly fired a gun twice, one bullet burying into the ground and another striking the woman. He then climbed into his truck in the parking lot and attempted to leave when Antell tried to stop him.

Antell, a father of three and CrossFit gym owner, retreated to his vehicle, grabbed his own gun, and approached the shooter, Arlington police said.

Instead of abiding by Antell’s commands to stop, police said the shooter climbed out of his truck and fired his gun again.

The shot hit Antell in the head, reported the Dallas Morning News. He was pronounced dead at the scene.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ervenes-in-domestic-dispute-and-is-shot-dead/

Maybe instead of acting like a cowboy, he should have let the professionals do their job? :dunno:
 
Maybe instead of acting like a cowboy, he should have let the professionals do their job? :dunno:

you mean those professionals who supposedly have such high quality training, that they hit more innocent bystanders than qualified civilians? and because of that, the law has to make asinine exemptions that excuse any liability for injuries or deaths by those professionals by blaming some perpetrator? or providing qualified immunity because they are an agent of the state? THOSE professionals?

here's an article you should read.....

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/julia/gorin030802.asp

it fits your cowardice well.
 
The person in question was simply responding to aggression against him in a place he had a legal right to be. This falls under the stand your ground law and is a justifiable homicide.
 
33C0EF6400000578-0-image-a-3_1462230873650.jpg

+5


Ricci Bradden, 23, walked into the the store and allegedly shot his wife, who is an employee, in the leg. He then tried to flee the scene


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ened-fire-inside-Walgreens.html#ixzz47dN6pWmm


Why would a white man get involved and try to help a nigger....they are not worth saving nor getting killed over.
 
The person in question was simply responding to aggression against him in a place he had a legal right to be. This falls under the stand your ground law and is a justifiable homicide.

Hardly. He was resisting a legal citizen's arrest. He comitted murder while resisting arrest.
 
Back
Top