Comrad Trumpovitch Calls for help from the Motherland!

anatta said:
you don't understand a "transactional" as a foreign policy.
You've seen his criticism of Hillary and her advocated destruction of Libya, and his ( true or not) claim he was opposed to Iraq.
Of the 2 who is less bellicose?
Click to expand...

He is, look up bellicose.
 
Jarod said:
He is, look up bellicose.
Click to expand...

demonstrating aggression and willingness to fight.
as in "a group of bellicose patriots"
synonyms: belligerent, aggressive, hostile, warlike, warmongering, hawkish, antagonistic, pugnacious, truculent, confrontational, contentious, militant, combative
 
anatta said:
demonstrating aggression and willingness to fight.
as in "a group of bellicose patriots"
synonyms: belligerent, aggressive, hostile, warlike, warmongering, hawkish, antagonistic, pugnacious, truculent, confrontational, contentious, militant, combative
Click to expand...

Very good, Comrade Anattachka!
 
anatta said:
political gaffes aren't of interest to me. The whole story is a large fruitcake with nuts frothing at the cake.
Considerit would take co-operation between Trump/Putin and WikiLeaks. Consider Assange cooperates with no one
and has already damaged Putin wit the Panama papers. al of a sudden this nexus crops up?

When did our press become this stupid? about the same time it became servile to Clinton?
can you imagine anyone running with this during Watergate? (no) stories were double checked before use.

The Emails mentioned are no doubt already in Russian hands ( unless you think using her server in hostile territories isn't consequential)..

Was he calling on Russia to "interfere?"-there is some traction on that at least. stick with that, the rest is garbage.
Click to expand...

You are aware that Julian Assange came right out and said that he timed the release of the e-mails to specifically damage Clinton's chances, yes? He absolutely hates her. That's no secret.

Do you honestly believe that if it served his purposes he still wouldn't cooperate?

It must be nice living in Never-Never Land. Remind me not to visit, ever, because clearly people don't think there. You should get out of there before it's too... never mind.
 
im watching the press conference now. This is good stuff. Trump makes a very good case as to why a federal minimum wage increase is lunacy and it has to be on a state by state basis.
 
c87eac8583e44807bc8556244f43fc83

​
 
Stelakh said:
You are aware that Julian Assange came right out and said that he timed the release of the e-mails to specifically damage Clinton's chances, yes? He absolutely hates her. That's no secret.

Do you honestly believe that if it served his purposes he still wouldn't cooperate?

It must be nice living in Never-Never Land. Remind me not to visit, ever, because clearly people don't think there. You should get out of there before it's too... never mind.
Click to expand...
Assange does "absolutely hate her" and for good reason.
WikiLeaks does a valuable service - the modern equivalent of investigative reporting -
since the rest of the press is no more then partisan cheerleaders.

It would take coordination between Wiki, Putin ( or the state actors) and Trump..and for what?
the DNC emails?
And if they were cooperating /coordinating would Trump be making such a public statement..
Also Assange is no friend of Putin -the Panama Papers release proves that.

Yet were supposed Russian intelligence in combination with a US POTUS campaign, and Wiki all have made clandestine contact
and directly decided on this course of action....for emails that are damaging to Wasserman Schultz, and a bit to the DNC
but not Hillary directly? That's an awful lot of exposure for minimal pay out..

You buy into this without really weighing the logistics vs. the rewards
 
anatta said:
Assange does "absolutely hate her" and for good reason.
WikiLeaks does a valuable service - the modern equivalent of investigative reporting -
since the rest of the press is no more then partisan cheerleaders.

It would take coordination between Wiki, Putin ( or the state actors) and Trump..and for what?
the DNC emails?
And if they were cooperating /coordinating would Trump be making such a public statement..
Also Assange is no friend of Putin -the Panama Papers release proves that.

Yet were supposed Russian intelligence in combination with a US POTUS campaign, and Wiki all have made clandestine contact
and directly decided on this course of action....for emails that are damaging to Wasserman Schultz, and a bit to the DNC
but not Hillary directly? That's an awful lot of exposure for minimal pay out..

You buy into this without really weighing the logistics vs. the rewards
Click to expand...

If Wikileaks is performing a valuable service by leaking confidential and classified information, why are you guys criticizing HRC? That's the big problem for her haters, that she compromised national security with a private server. Can't have it both ways.
 
christiefan915 said:
If Wikileaks is performing a valuable service by leaking confidential and classified information, why are you guys criticizing HRC? That's the big problem for her haters, that she compromised national security with a private server. Can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...

her server is wrong because she used it to make sure no FOIA requests could get to her. And when they did eventually she burned the evidence or deleted the emails in this case.

A dictator wants no accountability for their actions. Exactly like Hillary.
 
christiefan915 said:
If Wikileaks is performing a valuable service by leaking confidential and classified information, why are you guys criticizing HRC? That's the big problem for her haters, that she compromised national security with a private server. Can't have it both ways.
Click to expand...
in general..absent a specific case..Wiki is one of the few places where we get any kind of transparency.

It used to be gov't employees with a conscience would find corruption and leak it. or use an "off the record source"
That's pretty much gone -employees have to sign rigid non-disclosure statements, and whistleblower protection statutes are weak
and gov't will prosecute. at one time officials could be shamed into upholding ethics, now it's "catch me if you can" anything goes.

Clinton squirreled away her private server in what I'm 99% sure ( and based on her own words) to avoid transparency.
Specifically FOIA requests.. the motivations are diametrically opposed.

Clintons Emails gave us valuable info on her role in Libya- which was the same thing she advocated in Iraq -
but in a much more hands on way in Libya .
Also her continuous ever devolving lies 'splaining' the Emails completely fell apart. none of her claims/reasons stand up to scrutiny.

Wiki does compromise national security, but the price paid is worth the costs.
Clinton's "extreme carelessness" benefits no-one but hackers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top