obviously the the reading disorder is yours.![]()
Yeah, right. Where did I misrepresent Bloomberg's point or who had made it?
obviously the the reading disorder is yours.![]()
Yeah, right. Where did I misrepresent Bloomberg's point or who had made it?
LOl. Where didn't you?
In other words, you have no argument just an empty assertion. I explained Bloomberg's point clearly and correctly.
Sure, if you consider mud to be clear, and 2+2=5 to be correct. Sure, why not?![]()
Make an argument you fucking pusillanimous coward or stfu. You can point to no error in my presentation. It was quite clear what Bloomberg said and I only explained the point. If it is still mud to you, then that only shows that you can't read either.
Actually the difficulty in diagramming your contirbution would be in finding CORRECT content. burn.
You still have failed to offer a response or argument.
Easy....You still have failed to offer a response or argument.
At least i don't fail to achieve erections, like you do.
Easy....
"they could use that building IF it had some sort of landmark value.
when you really wanted to say, "they could use that building IF it had some sort of landmark value OR NOT.....
Stupid is as stupid does, right Gumpiefield ?
Amazing how a couple of words can change the meaning of the whole line.....
ROTFFLMAO!!!!
This is just the tip of the hate iceberg. I play poker with some diddoheads who believe that all muslims are terrorists and we as christians should declare another crusade.
Of course I make fun of them, 'Glenn Beck presents' "Kill a Muslim for Christ Crusade" was supposed to be a joke but they took it seriously and agreed with it. Their extreme hatred is just under the surface enforced by the misrepresentations of reality on Faux News.