Coming soon.... Boots on the ground.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
FastLane
Verified User
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Asked the abjectly stupid Trumpanzee who wept fake tears for the 13 U.S. military personnel killed in the Afghanistan withdrawal, but who says nothing at all about the U.S. service people Trump's gotten dead in the ME in the last two weeks. One of them the only son of a fellow Columbus OH resident. But who cares, right? Can't blame Biden for these needless deaths.
QP!
Verified User
AI Overview...
- Impact of Military Strikes: Following the June 2025 strikes, the Trump administration claimed the program was "obliterated" and a later Department of Defense briefing estimated a degradation of one to two years to restart the programs.
- Rebuilding Efforts: In March 2026, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified that there were no efforts to rebuild enrichment capacity destroyed in 2025.
- Missile Development: The DIA concluded in 2025 that it would still take roughly a decade for Iran to develop the technical skill to produce an arsenal of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) capable of reaching the United States.
He proves he's a moron every time he goes offscript.
MAGATs love explosions and rubble and missiles and bombs and dead bodies -- as long as THEY'RE safe and it isn't THEIR children dying.
FastLane
Verified User
Why are you pushing back against Trump when the is trying to rid the world of the misogynistic regime in Iran? What have YOU done for the oppressed women and girls of Iran.
^^^
Proves she's a drug-addicted lying moron.
One was shot down, one failed in flight and all Iran accomplished was pissing off the Brits who are likely to take part in the bombing campaign against Iranian offensive weapons systems.
MoD condemns Iran missile strikes towards UK-US base as Britain ‘dragged’ into war
Weapons fired after PM authorises US to carry out further attacks from UK bases, a move critics say must be approved by parliament
www.theguardian.com
One of the missiles was shot down by a US warship, while the other failed in flight, according to the Wall Street Journal, citing multiple officials.
The Ministry of Defence, which described US use of British bases as “limited and defensive” in nature, called the attacks “reckless”. A spokesperson said: “Iran’s reckless attacks, lashing out across the region and holding hostage the strait of Hormuz, are a threat to British interests and British allies.
“RAF jets and other UK military assets are continuing to defend our people and personnel in the region.
The religious leader we killed didn’t think his religion supported nuclear weapons, that may not be the case with his son.
The MAGA morons will defend their daddy when Iranian terrorists commit an attack on US soil, but most Americans will know the blame is squarely inside the Oval Office.
Even when he’s reading a prepared speech he proves he’s a moron!
What makes you think they want to strike NYC in the first place? trump saying so is not a reason.
"Iran fired two ballistic missiles at the British Indian Ocean Territory, the Wall Street Journal and CNN reported overnight into Saturday, citing unnamed US officials, but neither reached their target."
Iran to Diego Garcia - 4000 kilometers
Iran to New York City - 9879 kilometers
QP!
Verified User
You are the one who STILL maintains Trump was not wrong on "obliteration"
You are the one still saying they WERE obliterated.
So you are a moron if you believe they were "obliterated" but we must wage this war anyway based on a 'just in case we were wrong' rationalization.
By that stupidity America could not have accepted Japans surrender in WW2 because "what if the US was wrong in believing they surrender".
Militarys DO NOT ACT based on 'we must act because 'what if the POTUS was wrong'.
By mispronouncing words? It's like he never practices a speech. He just goes out and reads it off the teleprompter or his notes.
Exactly, truly an embarrassment.
You're funny. A misogynist trying to rid the world of another misogynist? That's not the reason trump attacked Iran and you know it.
I guess you were reduced to responding to a question with another question. Your argument is weak.
QP!
Verified User
@FastLane is desperate to now shift his argument.They dance around the word "obliterate" as if it has no real meaning. It's disgusting, the depths they sink to in order to support trump.
He still maintains the US did "obliterate" but wants to say also "what if the US and Trump was wrong on that assessment and that is why we are justified in this war".
While in his next sentence he will say 'but ya, Trump was right, we did obliterate it'.
FastLane
Verified User
You are like QP. You strain over the word "obliterated" when he perhaps should have used the words severely damaged. Big deal. To make Trump wrong you would rather let Iran get nukes. They just proved they can hit London the US can't be far behind.