COMEY IS NOT IN LEGAL PERIL

And, YOU keep asking the SAME things and posting the SAME talking points. Pay attention the first time.
If you keep asking and stating the SAME things, you'll keep getting the SAME answers. Figure it out :palm:

Another opinion:

“First of all, I don’t believe the inspector general would have jurisdiction over Comey any more, because he’s no longer a federal employee.” The inspector general’s job is to investigate wrongdoing by employees of the Justice Department, which Comey is no longer, thanks to Trump — though the IG would have the ability to investigate an allegation of criminal misconduct.

“But, second,” he continued, “initiating an investigation because you don’t like somebody’s testimony could be considered obstruction. And in the whistleblower context, it’s both evidence of retaliation and, under some laws, could be an adverse retaliatory act itself.”

In other words, Comey, here, is an employee who is blowing the whistle, to use the idiom, on his former boss. That boss wants to punish him for doing so. That’s problematic — especially if there’s no evidence that Comey actually violated any law that would trigger punishment.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...trump-may-be-about-to/?utm_term=.e2dd22ed5786
 
WHISTLEBLOWER - The disclosure by a person, usually an employee in a government agency or private enterprise, to the public or to those in authority, of mismanagement, corruption, illegality, or some other wrongdoing.

Comey was not a whistleblower because his boss (Trump) wasn't involved in illegal activity. Comey stated more than once that Trump was not a subject of investigation in the Russia stuff. Plus, Comey said there was no obstruction. Comey was a mad little boy who got fired.
Try again.
 
WHISTLEBLOWER - The disclosure by a person, usually an employee in a government agency or private enterprise, to the public or to those in authority, of mismanagement, corruption, illegality, or some other wrongdoing.

Comey was not a whistleblower because his boss (Trump) wasn't involved in illegal activity. Comey stated more than once that Trump was not a subject of investigation in the Russia stuff. Plus, Comey said there was no obstruction. Comey was a mad little boy who got fired.
Try again.

It appears that liberal snowflakes will always fail to take into consideration that someone who was fired, might just have an axe to grind; but is careful enough to make sure they don't hang themselves.
But Comey did say that he felt pressured from Lynch to end the Hillary investigation, so this may not be ended.
 
It appears that liberal snowflakes will always fail to take into consideration that someone who was fired, might just have an axe to grind; but is careful enough to make sure they don't hang themselves.
But Comey did say that he felt pressured from Lynch to end the Hillary investigation, so this may not be ended.

It's amazing how the left give a wink and a nod to that.
 
It appears that liberal snowflakes will always fail to take into consideration that someone who was fired, might just have an axe to grind; but is careful enough to make sure they don't hang themselves.
But Comey did say that he felt pressured from Lynch to end the Hillary investigation, so this may not be ended.

Link


just lying about shit wont work dickbag
 
they are his notes

they are not classified

they are what he was going to testify too idiots


he had every right to release them

The people of this opinion quote the below given statute and give the following explanation.

Notes made as part of his duty, on our dime, on our computers, as a memorandum, are work and therefore government documents however unclassified they may be they cannot be converted to personal use, given over to another, "conveyed", or even disposed of...

Comey admitted to converting these documents to his use when he flat stated he, with intent, gave them to a friend with expressed instructions to leak them to another in order to gain an action...

18 U.S. Code 641


Anyway, here is the law these people are talking about, it has nothing to do with classified information, it simply is the work product itself that cannot be converted to his own use:
Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States or any department or agency thereof; or

Whoever receives, conceals, or retains the same with intent to convert it to his use or gain, knowing it to have been embezzled, stolen, purloined or converted—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the value of such property in the aggregate, combining amounts from all the counts for which the defendant is convicted in a single case, does not exceed the sum of $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

The word “value” means face, par, or market value, or cost price, either wholesale or retail, whichever is greater.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 725; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), (L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, § 606(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3511; Pub. L. 108–275, § 4, July 15, 2004, 118 Stat. 833.)

While I agree they are work product, I do not agree they have monetary value unless he sold them to the paper (or his friend did). So under this statute he could be fined or imprisoned for one year or both for converting the record to his own use then conveying the record to a friend for directed use...
 
The people of this opinion quote the below given statute and give the following explanation.

Notes made as part of his duty, on our dime, on our computers, as a memorandum, are work and therefore government documents however unclassified they may be they cannot be converted to personal use, given over to another, "conveyed", or even disposed of...

Comey admitted to converting these documents to his use when he flat stated he, with intent, gave them to a friend with expressed instructions to leak them to another in order to gain an action...

18 U.S. Code 641


Anyway, here is the law these people are talking about, it has nothing to do with classified information, it simply is the work product itself that cannot be converted to his own use:

Excellent post; but the JPP liberal snowflakes will ignore it and Desh will just, once again, proclaim that you're not really you.

:facepalm:
 
The people of this opinion quote the below given statute and give the following explanation.

Notes made as part of his duty, on our dime, on our computers, as a memorandum, are work and therefore government documents however unclassified they may be they cannot be converted to personal use, given over to another, "conveyed", or even disposed of...

Comey admitted to converting these documents to his use when he flat stated he, with intent, gave them to a friend with expressed instructions to leak them to another in order to gain an action...

18 U.S. Code 641


Anyway, here is the law these people are talking about, it has nothing to do with classified information, it simply is the work product itself that cannot be converted to his own use:

I've been posting this all day long. There are some here that simply refuse to believe it, understand it and have no interest in the truth. :(
 
WHISTLEBLOWER - The disclosure by a person, usually an employee in a government agency or private enterprise, to the public or to those in authority, of mismanagement, corruption, illegality, or some other wrongdoing.

Comey was not a whistleblower because his boss (Trump) wasn't involved in illegal activity. Comey stated more than once that Trump was not a subject of investigation in the Russia stuff. Plus, Comey said there was no obstruction. Comey was a mad little boy who got fired.
Try again.

Liar
 
Back
Top