Colin Powell demands answers over Curveball's WMD lies

You're asking for a link?

You don't even know that well-known piece of history...but call it a lie, and then ask for a link?

What a fool....

:palm:

not all your claims are true, the only true part is about the veracity of curveball, the rest are pure lies....and i am not at all surprised you won't give a link. you never do when you're lying.
 
not all your claims are true, the only true part is about the veracity of curveball, the rest are pure lies....and i am not at all surprised you won't give a link. you never do when you're lying.

I don't give you links for anything, Yurtsie. Your responses when you're in a corner are way too predictable.

I'm not lying, though. Bush knew Curveball was unreliable, yet still espoused his intel to the world as "proof"....
 
I don't give you links for anything, Yurtsie. Your responses when you're in a corner are way too predictable.

I'm not lying, though. Bush knew Curveball was unreliable, yet still espoused his intel to the world as "proof"....

bush did have other sources, it is a lie to claim it was only curveball....additionally, if a source's credibility is called into question, you can either choose to believe it or not. but its not a lie to use the source information.

you don't link for anything when you're lying onceler. but when you think you're right, you're comb the ends of the earth to provide a link.
 
bush did have other sources, it is a lie to claim it was only curveball....additionally, if a source's credibility is called into question, you can either choose to believe it or not. but its not a lie to use the source information.

you don't link for anything when you're lying onceler. but when you think you're right, you're comb the ends of the earth to provide a link.

Curveball was the ONLY source for mobile bio-weapons labs; not for all WMD's.

And in his SOU, Bush said they had multiple sources confirming mobile bio-weapons labs, when he knew Curveball was the only one, and knew he was deemed unreliable.

Bush lied.
 
bush did have other sources, it is a lie to claim it was only curveball....additionally, if a source's credibility is called into question, you can either choose to believe it or not. but its not a lie to use the source information.

you don't link for anything when you're lying onceler. but when you think you're right, you're comb the ends of the earth to provide a link.

So where are your links to these apparently unimpeachable sources of information? What makes me laugh is that you claim to know about other sources yet many actual former members of the Bush admin say otherwise.
 
So where are your links to these apparently unimpeachable sources of information? What makes me laugh is that you claim to know about other sources yet many actual former members of the Bush admin say otherwise.

all you and onceler have to do to show i'm wrong is give a link to your claims. i will admit i'm wrong if you can support your claim. i'll even put in bold tom.

link up to former memberS that say otherwise.....
 
Curveball was the ONLY source for mobile bio-weapons labs; not for all WMD's.

And in his SOU, Bush said they had multiple sources confirming mobile bio-weapons labs, when he knew Curveball was the only one, and knew he was deemed unreliable.

Bush lied.

can't find a link huh.....lol
 
Yurtsie has such a hard time admitting he's wrong. Especially when it comes to anything about Bush.

The noble & wonderful Bush couldn't have possibly lied, in Yurtsie-world...
 
Yurtsie has such a hard time admitting he's wrong. Especially when it comes to anything about Bush.

The noble & wonderful Bush couldn't have possibly lied, in Yurtsie-world...

lol....so you can't find a link....now you resort to ad homs....LMAO

sucks to get caught in your lies huh onceler
 
lol....so you can't find a link....now you resort to ad homs....LMAO

sucks to get caught in your lies huh onceler

Personally, I think it would suck to be so devoted to a politician, especially one like Bush.

But that's just me...
 
Personally, I think it would suck to be so devoted to a politician, especially one like Bush.

But that's just me...

yeah, that would suck. then again, so do your lies. but you have no problem spouting them everyday.....

tff you can't find a link. :)

why do you enjoy lying so much? really? i think you're a decent guy, but when it comes to those you don't like, you pretty much just attack them and lie about them. its really weird.
 
Bush got a PDB saying that Curveball had been deemed an "unreliable" source. Just days before his SOU before the war. And he still cited him in the speech. Not only that, he said "multiple sources," when he was actually only talking about Curveball.

Bush lied.
Really.....where can I read all about that ?

Of course we know there was rumors about Curveball....
Where did the intell come from that he was unreliable?
It couldn't have been

The Germans, no, I guess not, because actually it was their intell that the CIA was going on....?
The British?
The French?
Our CIA?
The Russians?

But then....there are no "multiple sources" to speak of are there ?

Well, just link me up....and not the Huffington Post or some other place like it. Maybe the 9/11 Commission...
 

thanks for the links tom. i clicked on each link and none of the links support your claim. perhaps you could quote the salient portion from any one of those links that support your claim. all you have is opinions. one link is about bush having "zero" evidence. ok. that actually goes against your, or onceler's claim that you agreed with, that bush only had curveball as intelligence.

if you can quote specifically from a link something that supports your claim, i will absolutely admit i'm wrong. find me something that says bush SOLELY relied on curveball for his intelligence. that is the claim onceler made and you as well by defending his claim.

back it up tom. and again, thanks for the links.
 
thanks for the links tom. i clicked on each link and none of the links support your claim. perhaps you could quote the salient portion from any one of those links that support your claim. all you have is opinions. one link is about bush having "zero" evidence. ok. that actually goes against your, or onceler's claim that you agreed with, that bush only had curveball as intelligence.

if you can quote specifically from a link something that supports your claim, i will absolutely admit i'm wrong. find me something that says bush SOLELY relied on curveball for his intelligence. that is the claim onceler made and you as well by defending his claim.

back it up tom. and again, thanks for the links.


So how about you providing some links to support your version of history?
 
So how about you providing some links to support your version of history?

um....you and onceler made specific claims...i called bullshit, its up to YOU to back up your claim. your links failed to do so. i'm not surprised you couldn't find any quote from your links to support your claim.

i'll take that as - you're wrong. but i don't expect you to admit it like i would.
 
um....you and onceler made specific claims...i called bullshit, its up to YOU to back up your claim. your links failed to do so. i'm not surprised you couldn't find any quote from your links to support your claim.

i'll take that as - you're wrong. but i don't expect you to admit it like i would.

Holy shit you are not being paid to lie now, the meter has stopped running.
 
I found something....

Germany's former foreign minister Joschka Fischer...

"We decided, therefore, that we would do our duty by sending the Americans all the information we had, together with our assessment that that information came from a deserter and that we had not verified or substantiated it ourselves, and that it could be completely wrong."

He said the then head of the BND, August Henning, wrote a letter to the CIA outlining the possible problems with Curveball.

Can't find a date for this info
----------------

So our CIA knew curveball's information was...

not verified
not substantiated
could be wrong

And here I thought the CIA
KNEW, with absolute certainty, that the intell was bogus....
and told Bush that.....with certainty.

but all I get is ...."could be wrong"

Thats the nature of intelligence....it "could" always be incorrect, right?
 
Originally Posted by Onceler View Post
Curveball was the ONLY source for mobile bio-weapons labs; not for all WMD's.

And in his SOU, Bush said they had multiple sources confirming mobile bio-weapons labs, when he knew Curveball was the only one, and knew he was deemed unreliable. Bush lied.
---------

So thats the issue....mobile bio-weapons labs....
Thats it?
The intell was questionable from the start and Bush went with it anyway...

Thats the whole thing?
Thats the big argument here?
So Bush is a war criminal for that?

You actually think we would not have gone to war if no one ever heard of "curveball".....

Get real,
He is a fuckin' atom in the ocean...hes nothing.
 
There is much more convincing evidence that the Bush Administration lied about these imaginary bio-labs a few months after the fall of Saddam....
But that is lies after the war .... not before.
 
Back
Top