Cold Dead Hand

Howey said:
Bullshit. Your argument loses any validity when you realize the gun and ammo manufacturers are making historically high profits through increased prices off the deaths of those 26 children.
Click to expand...

The increased sales of weapons and ammo is NOT due to the deaths of the children. It is due to the fear of the overreaction that might occur due to the hyperbole of the radical left and the speculation of how that might affect future weapon and ammo sales.
 
Superfreak said:
No... it is not a political act. It is the act of a lunatic. A lunatic who meticulously detailed previous mass murders and charted them. A lunatic who played a lot of video games and wanted to get the high score.

The AR15 was the tool this lunatic chose. The lunatic at UCF chose to make a bunch of bombs, but not a peep from the left about that. Was it because he at least had the decency to kill himself before unleashing those bombs? Or was it because you know how stupid it would make you look to go after the chemicals he used to make the bombs?

It is not the weapon chosen... it is the person that is the problem. But you cannot grasp that fact because the music you play while dancing on those kids graves is just too loud for you to hear rational thought.



The 'dummies' are people like you Darla. Do you honestly think this kid would have said 'damn, AR15's are illegal, I guess I can't go psycho'? No, he would simply have chosen another type of weapon. But you fear mongers don't care about that. You have graves to dance upon.



It is truly comical when you try to pretend that you are the one who gets to decide if something is political/discrimantory/racists/sexist etc... bottom line Darla is that you don't know what the fuck you are talking about... but you THINK you do... big problem
Click to expand...

You know just one day I'd like to make a post on here without you having a temper tantrum over it. And the person who just made a post about jumping on the bodies of dead children really should be doing a brain cleanse. I suggest you look up the Goop, she has a cleanse for everything.
 
Howey said:
I used your words WB. "Gun control", as has been proposed, doesn't take away any guns. Some proposals restrict the type of guns that can be sold in the future, but that's not the same, is it?
Click to expand...
it is exactly the same. it's taking away my right to own one of those should I choose to in the future, which is the same as taking away my gun.
 
Independent said:
The increased sales of weapons and ammo is NOT due to the deaths of the children. It is due to the fear of the overreaction that might occur due to the hyperbole of the radical left and the speculation of how that might affect future weapon and ammo sales.
Click to expand...


Fact is massacres are great for the gun and ammunition business. That is an unholy business no matter how you cut it. And when billions are made off of dead bodies, that business is open to attack and criticism. Just ask the MIC. That's how it is. Boo hoo.
 
Darla said:
Fact is massacres are great for the gun and ammunition business. That is an unholy business no matter how you cut it. And when billions are made off of dead bodies, that business is open to attack and criticism. Just ask the MIC. That's how it is. Boo hoo.
Click to expand...
hows the war on drugs? the war in afghanistan? syria? getting ready for Iran? are you lining up to protest that unholiness?

the truth of the matter is that it isn't massacres that are great for the gun and ammunition business, but the push to disarm and control us through government tyranny that increases the sales.
 
Darla said:
You know just one day I'd like to make a post on here without you having a temper tantrum over it. And the person who just made a post about jumping on the bodies of dead children really should be doing a brain cleanse. I suggest you look up the Goop, she has a cleanse for everything.
Click to expand...

LOL... just once I would like to make a post without you injecting your rage into the discussion with your feeble attempts to project 'anger/temper tantrums/rage etc...' onto me.

I am laughing AT you, not with you
 
Darla said:
Fact is massacres are great for the gun and ammunition business. That is an unholy business no matter how you cut it. And when billions are made off of dead bodies, that business is open to attack and criticism. Just ask the MIC. That's how it is. Boo hoo.
Click to expand...

So you think it is the massacre that causes an increase in sales? You don't think the increase is a response to the fear mongers reaction to the massacre?

You don't seem to grasp the cause and effect very well.
 
Darla said:
You know just one day I'd like to make a post on here without you having a temper tantrum over it. And the person who just made a post about jumping on the bodies of dead children really should be doing a brain cleanse. I suggest you look up the Goop, she has a cleanse for everything.
Click to expand...

Did you realize that every time you can't respond to the points made, you resort to the above childish claims?
 
See everyone is using that spoiler function now! Even string just used it, so I don't think I was the only one who thought only you could do it grind!
 
Darla said:
See everyone is using that spoiler function now! Even string just used it, so I don't think I was the only one who thought only you could do it grind!
Click to expand...

talking about spoilers will not make people forget you cannot address the points made against your fear mongering
 
Independent said:
What mass killers ALL have in common is the use of violent video games before they have gone on their murder spree. More people are killed by blunt objects every year than by the assault weapons that the radical left is trying to ban.

Thus, it seems that it would make more sense to ban video games and rocks than to ban assault weapons.

Just sayin'
Click to expand...

Except almost everyone plays those games. That's like saying all mass murders have hemoglobin.
 
Lucius Cornelius Sulla said:
Except almost everyone plays those games.
Click to expand...
So, there would be an uproar if violent video games were banned because there is not enough of a correlation between mass murders and people who play violent video games. interesting. Yet there is more of a correlation between violent video games and the so called assault weapons that the radical left wishes to ban...

What conclusions might we infer from these points?
 
I Love America said:
PLanned Parenthod raises money on the backs of millions of dead babies a year. What's your point?
Click to expand...

What's this?

Another angry Rightie tries to change the subject to avoid admitting that NRA ghouls profited off the massacre of small children.

Just when you think they couldn't possibly stoop any lower...
 
Darla said:
Sit down dimwits, I have some news:

when a man walks into a grade school and explodes the bodies of over 20 6 year olds with a Bushmaster AR15, that's a political act. I know this is rough for you dummies to get your minds around. But the fact that that gun is available in this country to shred up a bunch of crying and terrified six years olds, is due to politics. It's all political.

Crying and whining like little babies for your mommies to come rub your behinds with ointment because you have a rash, just shows you have no idea of what a political act is.
Click to expand...


Brilliant.

Absolutely spot on!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top