Cohen’s pleas concocted by prosecutors to snare Trump

They have to report campaign expenditures for any spending including their own money. The issue in this case is whether is whether the money was spent to influence the election.

lol.....and strippers are campaign expenditures?........I think your ass is a campaign and your shit is the expenditure......
 
It is clear that the Southern District of New York has many staff attorneys who are partisan hacks and clueless about the law.

What makes that clear about the NY attorneys and what makes Levin correct? We know he is a partisan hack by listening to his radio show or subbing for Rush Limbaugh.

The FEC website has all the campaign finance regulations. Maybe somebody can post a link to the relevant provisions.

As it is, the Trump supporters are claiming it is not a violation and the Trump haters think it is--not exactly unbiased opinions.
 
lol.....and strippers are campaign expenditures?........I think your ass is a campaign and your shit is the expenditure......

I'm not talking about strippers. You posted that a candidate only has to report campaign contributions and not spending--that is total hogwash. Detailed spending reports are required.
 
How is that clear and what makes Levin correct? We know he is a partisan hack by just listening to his radio show.
All the rules and regulations are on the FEC website. Someone should be able to help us understand these rules by linking to the relevant provisions.

What is clear is the desperation of liberal hacks trying to fabricate a crime where none exists and blame Hillary's loss on the Russians. This whole investigation is based on a hoax concocted within the Justice Department under Obama's watch.

You have to be deaf, or dumb, or blind to not comprehend the obvious.
 
Remember, Trump first claimed that he never made any payments to Stormy Daniels.

NOT A CRIME!

giphy.gif
 
The point is that he did it in order to keep it from the American people, and he used campaign funds to do it.

SUPER illegal.
Tell him that the affairs were from 10 years ago, and the payments were made during the election because the women were going to talk. Big difference, but you have to have a clear mind to understand that.
 
What makes that clear about the NY attorneys and what makes Levin correct? We know he is a partisan hack by listening to his radio show or subbing for Rush Limbaugh.

The FEC website has all the campaign finance regulations. Maybe somebody can post a link to the relevant provisions.

As it is, the Trump supporters are claiming it is not a violation and the Trump haters think it is--not exactly unbiased opinions.

See above.
 
I'm not talking about strippers. You posted that a candidate only has to report campaign contributions and not spending--that is total hogwash. Detailed spending reports are required.

ONLY IF THEY ARE CAMPAIGN RELATED! Good lord, you give new meaning to the word DENSE!

Trying to argue that the Stormy incident was campaign related and attempting to influence an election is about as moronic as claiming the Russians got Trump elected.
 
Tell him that the affairs were from 10 years ago, and the payments were made during the election because the women were going to talk. Big difference, but you have to have a clear mind to understand that.

Dear moron; the fact is that it was an attempt to blackmail and a breach of contract makes the slut the criminal, not Trump. Trump can give as much money as he wants to anyone he wants to anytime he wants to to shut their yaps and it will NEVER be a crime.
 
Proteges?

Who is the protege?

What the fuck are you talking about?

Wow.

In about 2 years, anatta will be on these boards claiming to have never supported Trump, or will delete the anatta account and create a brand new one that is "True Conservative" or whatever the next re-brand is going to be.
Hah! Proteges that want to learn how to fail at everything?


You're not going to believe this, but in '08 he was a Hillary guy.
 
Perhaps "they would have likely made anyway" is true, but the secrecy and manner in which they were made is the difference

And forget the martyr appeal for Trump, his blunders is solely his own doings
He would have likely made ten years after the fact? Man...Hannity sure has Annoise's attention...huh?

No. Ten years ago, Cohen would have threatened them with bodily harm and a bogus lawsuit.
 
I'm not talking about strippers. You posted that a candidate only has to report campaign contributions and not spending--that is total hogwash. Detailed spending reports are required.

he has to report expenditures of campaign contributions........he doesn't have to report expenditures of his own funds for non campaign purposes........can't get any simpler than that......
 
ONLY IF THEY ARE CAMPAIGN RELATED! Good lord, you give new meaning to the word DENSE!

Trying to argue that the Stormy incident was campaign related and attempting to influence an election is about as moronic as claiming the Russians got Trump elected.

Read carefully. We were not talking about (only) Stormy. I said campaign expenditures must be reported and you said something like "....are you aware only campaign contributions have to be reported and not spending."

At least you are now admitting candidates must report expenditures.

Whether this applies to Stormy and McDougal are unsettled issues.
 
he has to report expenditures of campaign contributions........he doesn't have to report expenditures of his own funds for non campaign purposes........can't get any simpler than that......

Yes--I think you finally understand it---that is not what you claimed earlier.
 
Back
Top