Cohen is Sentenced - Does it mean Mueller has NOTHING?

Truth Detector

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
In any criminal case, isn't it common that when you have the goods on a witness and are trying to ensnare their boss, you typically wait to sentence them until AFTER they have testified on behalf of the prosecution?

What the Cohen sentence seems to mean to me, is that Mueller has NOTHING and got NOTHING from Cohen. Thoughts?
 
Nothing about the bimbo payments was illegal. This is total b.s.

What Cohen is guilty of (apparently) is lying to the IRS and banks about his own income. Nothing to do with Trump.
 
volsrock said:
Nothing about the bimbo payments was illegal. This is total b.s.

What Cohen is guilty of (apparently) is lying to the IRS and banks about his own income. Nothing to do with Trump.
Click to expand...

he can face a pretty stiff fine for campaign violations
 
Truth Detector said:
In any criminal case, isn't it common that when you have the goods on a witness and are trying to ensnare their boss, you typically wait to sentence them until AFTER they have testified on behalf of the prosecution?

What the Cohen sentence seems to mean to me, is that Mueller has NOTHING and got NOTHING from Cohen. Thoughts?
Click to expand...

No
 
zymurgy said:
he can face a pretty stiff fine for campaign violations
Click to expand...

Trump actually can go to prison for the campaign finance violations. They tried to put John Edwards in prison for basically the same thing, Jerry just did not agree based on those facts.
 
Truth Detector said:
In any criminal case, isn't it common that when you have the goods on a witness and are trying to ensnare their boss, you typically wait to sentence them until AFTER they have testified on behalf of the prosecution?

What the Cohen sentence seems to mean to me, is that Mueller has NOTHING and got NOTHING from Cohen. Thoughts?
Click to expand...

Or he has already given them everything they need and are adding it to the pile for when they finish this
 
Jarod said:
Trump actually can go to prison for the campaign finance violations. They tried to put John Edwards in prison for basically the same thing, Jerry just did not agree based on those facts.
Click to expand...

tried and failed. No precedence exists for anything but a stiff fine.
 
zymurgy said:
tried and failed. No precedence exists for anything but a stiff fine.
Click to expand...

So using your logic, slashing your ex-wife’s throat with a knife only comes with a fine because the jury found O.J. Not-guilty?
 
Jarod said:
So using your logic, slashing your ex-wife’s throat with a knife only comes with a fine because the jury found O.J. Not-guilty?
Click to expand...

yeah - because that is the only case involving murder

do you shit stains every step back and see how stupid your replies come across?
 
Gunny2009 said:
Or he has already given them everything they need and are adding it to the pile for when they finish this
Click to expand...

They are not looking for him to testify, he is a liar, they used him for other more definatitive hard evidence.
 
zymurgy said:
yeah - because that is the only case involving murder

do you shit stains every step back and see how stupid your replies come across?
Click to expand...

My point, and you know it, is that just because a jury finds someone not guilty does not mean the alleged crime is only punishable by a fine.
 
Jarod said:
My point, and you know it, is that just because a jury finds someone not guilty does not mean the alleged crime is only punishable by a fine.
Click to expand...

my point is this would be the first jail time for such a thing. no history exists for such a stiff penalty. none. We would become a banana republic if Demos pursue this idiocy
 
[h=1]Three years in prison for pay-offs to influence an election?

... and the "Individual-1" that coordinated and paid for these pay-offs gets what?

What more evidence do you need to impeach after such a crime?

Bill Clinton did far less?[/h]





 
zymurgy said:
my point is this would be the first jail time for such a thing. no history exists for such a stiff penalty. none. We would become a banana republic if Demos pursue this idiocy
Click to expand...

History exists for the Justice department Prosecuting the crime When Democrats did it.
 
[h=1]K A R M A :cool:[/h]

DuO3RGHWkAUfZgD.jpg
 
Bourbon said:
Oh yea ... that has to be it .... :laugh:
Click to expand...

What do you think it is? Once someone is sentenced, you have ZERO leverage. I see you are not only ignorant about economics, politics and facts, but also about how the real world works.

Tell me why someone would sentence anyone if there was a larger investigation going as the FAKE media and idiots like you suggest there is....ie. Trump?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top