CNN Producer Says Russia Narrative “bullsh*t"

How does that dubious behaviour by Trump justify the out and out lying by CNN? That's just ridiculous and you know it.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

It's not dubious behavior - it's a liar lying.

I'm just not sure why Trump supporters don't hold him to any kind of standards. His lying doesn't make CNN's bias right - but it's certainly a glass houses thing when it comes to Trump & his minions.
 
It's not dubious behavior - it's a liar lying.

I'm just not sure why Trump supporters don't hold him to any kind of standards. His lying doesn't make CNN's bias right - but it's certainly a glass houses thing when it comes to Trump & his minions.
CNN were obviously on a mission to get rid of a duly elected president by fair means or foul, mostly foul. Yes Trump is a stranger to the truth at times but then he would not be the first. Johnson got the US into the Vietnam War on a lie as Bush in Iraq. When Trump does something like that then I will be the first to call for his blood.

Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
 
He even admitted that it's all about ratings. The Democrats I fear will suffer greatly from this, it is going to explode in their midst.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk

He also said something that myself and others have been alluding to for months.

The Smoking Gun should have been leaked by now and the fact it hasn't, is telling. Unbiased observers are going to conclude it hasn't leaked---because it doesn't exist. And if it didn't exist 6 weeks ago, it's not going to begin to exist in the future.

The partisan diehards in the media are driving this thing. Even some congressional democrats have cooled off on it, instinctively, because they can pay a political price for continuing to push it when 'there's no there, there'.

And this is one issue where Trump can't do wrong with his Tweets. Every time the media sends up a trial Russian balloon, he shoots it down on Twitter. The media can't spin it or ask follow up questions when he does, and it drives them bonkers lol.

The media is losing a media war. I thought I would never see the day that would happen---because Trump isn't your average republican.
 
Pretty funny, the video was a James O'Keefe production, you know the same guy who got caught slicing the Planned Parenthood video and attempting to pay people to disrupt Trump's Inauguration, and the producer doesn't even deal with political topics at CNN. Other than Hannity and the Fox demogogues, forgotten by Wednesday, as it should be

No wonder they bought Trump's "believe me folks, believe me" hook, line, and sinker

BINGO!

Another HEAVILY EDITED hit job from the totally discredited Project Bullsh...I mean Veritas.
 
It's not about who did the film. It's the words of CNN. Kind of like when people hated Assange because of his actual message which was true. It's about the message, not the messenger.

Except it IS about who did the video.

O'Keefe has been caught lying numerous times in the past.

ANY message he might post is highly suspect.
 
CNN stands by our medical producer John Bonifield,” a spokesperson said in an email. “Diversity of personal opinion is what makes CNN strong, we welcome it and embrace it.
ROFL..they stand by "diversity", but they don't dispute the tape!
 
Sarah Palin sues NY Times over editorial tying her to Giffords shooting
The editorial, attributed to The Times' editorial board and titled "America's Lethal Politics," initially linked Palin's rhetoric to the shooting that killed six people and wounded 13 others, including then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

The paper posted a correction the next day admitting that "no such link was established."

The editorial also claimed, incorrectly, that a now-infamous ad from Palin's political action committee put "Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs[sic]." The Times also corrected that statement, admitting that the crosshairs on the map targeted "electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...editorial-tying-her-to-giffords-shooting.html

it's a bad day for fake news
 
He also said something that myself and others have been alluding to for months.

The Smoking Gun should have been leaked by now and the fact it hasn't, is telling. Unbiased observers are going to conclude it hasn't leaked---because it doesn't exist. And if it didn't exist 6 weeks ago, it's not going to begin to exist in the future.

The partisan diehards in the media are driving this thing. Even some congressional democrats have cooled off on it, instinctively, because they can pay a political price for continuing to push it when 'there's no there, there'.

And this is one issue where Trump can't do wrong with his Tweets. Every time the media sends up a trial Russian balloon, he shoots it down on Twitter. The media can't spin it or ask follow up questions when he does, and it drives them bonkers lol.

The media is losing a media war. I thought I would never see the day that would happen---because Trump isn't your average republican.
The fact that it hadn't leaked means that Mueller has a top notch, loyal and professional team.

The reason the WH has leaks is that people are loyal to America and are concerned about the Trump administration.
 
How does that dubious behaviour by Trump justify the out and out lying by CNN? That's just ridiculous and you know it.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
In a staff meeting Monday afternoon, investigative unit members were told that the retraction did not mean the facts of the story were necessarily wrong. Rather, it meant that "the story wasn't solid enough to publish as-is," one of the people briefed on the investigation said.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...cnn-announcement-retracted-article/index.html
 
It's not dubious behavior - it's a liar lying.

I'm just not sure why Trump supporters don't hold him to any kind of standards. His lying doesn't make CNN's bias right - but it's certainly a glass houses thing when it comes to Trump & his minions.

what did he lie about, lets all see how ridiculous you sound when you answer
 
In a staff meeting Monday afternoon, investigative unit members were told that the retraction did not mean the facts of the story were necessarily wrong. Rather, it meant that "the story wasn't solid enough to publish as-is," one of the people briefed on the investigation said.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...cnn-announcement-retracted-article/index.html

They fire people based on a published story's lack of corroborating sources ...
CNN is more credible because of these actions... not less...
 
We don't have rigged elections even though Obama knew of possible Putin 'activity' prior to October 2016...

TIME Magazine
Katie Reilly
Oct 18, 2016


President Barack Obama on Tuesday attacked Donald Trump for making "unprecedented" and "irresponsible" claims about a rigged election.

"I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes," Obama said in the Rose Garden during a joint press conference with Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi ahead of the Obamas' final state dinner.

"I have never seen, in my lifetime or in modern political history, any presidential candidate trying to discredit the elections and the election process before votes have even taken place," Obama added.


Later in the press conference......................

OBAMA:

"One of the great things about America's democracy is we have a vigorous, sometimes bitter political contest and when it's done, historically, regardless of party, the person who loses the election congratulates the winner, who reaffirms our democracy and we move forward.

That's how democracy survives because we recognize that there's something more important than any individual campaign. And that is making sure that the integrity and trust in our institutions sustains itself.

Because democracy, by definition, works by consent, not by force. I have never seen, in my lifetime or in modern political history, any presidential candidate trying to discredit the elections and the election process before votes have even taken place.

It's unprecedented. It happens to be based on no facts; every expert, regardless of political party, regardless of ideology, conservative or liberal, who has ever examined these issues in a serious way, will tell you that instances of significant voter fraud are not to be found, that -- keep in mind, elections are run by state and local officials, which means that there are places like Florida, for example, where you've got a Republican governor, whose Republican appointees are going to running and monitoring a whole bunch of these election sites.

The notion that somehow if Mr. Trump loses Florida, it's because of those people that you have to watch out for, that is both irresponsible and, by the way, doesn't really show the kind of leadership and toughness that you want out of a president.

If you start whining before the game's even over, if whenever things are going badly for you and you lose, you start blaming somebody else, then you don't have what it takes to be in this job because there are a lot of times when things don't go our way or my way.

That's OK, you fight through it, you work through it, you try to accomplish your goals. But the larger point I want to emphasize here is that there is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even -- you could even rig America's elections, in part, because they are so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved.

There is no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time. And so I'd invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes.

And if he got the most votes, then it would be my expectation of Hillary Clinton to offer a gracious concession speech and pledge to work with him in order to make sure that the American people benefit from an effective government.

And it would be my job to welcome Mr. Trump, regardless of what he's said about me or my differences with him on my opinions, and escort him over to the Capitol, in which there would be a peaceful transfer of power.

That's what Americans do."
 
Back
Top