CNN Embarasses Reince Priebus In His Attempt To Suppress Information

Anti-Party

Anti-Party

Tea Is The New Kool-Aid

The Republican National Committee is trying to suppress information about Hillary Clinton. A documentary that involved Hillary set to air is the issue. The RNC says they won't allow CNN (and NBC) to hold a hold a Republican debate on their network if they air this documentary whether it makes Clinton look bad or good.

We know that suppression of information is what a cult uses. It's how you keep the brainwashed from learning the truth that way you can keep feeding lies.

Erin Burnett here points out that the RNC may be pulling their debate because CNN's "hard" questions made them stumble and look like fools last election. Reince Priebus paints himself in a corner just like all Right Wingers do. He states, "We had moderators that did not have the best interest of our party and our nominee's at heart"...................Basically stating that if you don't set up a question base that is easy for us and makes us look good, we don't want to answer your questions.

Then CNN uses a Roger Ailes clip to drive the nail in even further....

Coward cultish RNC.
 
do they remember they did a hit piece movie on Hilary before the last election she was in?

Its OK for them to do But no talking about Hilarys life because her life is too impressive?
 
Nobody cares about Hillary. She is yesterdays news. If the democrat party really wanted Hillary as President, they would have chosen her last time and made the half white guy wait. They didn't.
 
wow your a real fucking braintrust huh.

stupid and sociopathic is no way to go through life
 
evince said:
do they remember they did a hit piece movie on Hilary before the last election she was in?

Its OK for them to do But no talking about Hilarys life because her life is too impressive?
Click to expand...

Yea, the hypocrisy of it screams LOUD. Which is why I thought it was funny that the CNN reporter took the next step instead of using hypocrisy. She showed that they were scared to debate a neutral debate with CNN.
 
I Love America said:
Nobody cares about Hillary. She is yesterdays news. If the democrat party really wanted Hillary as President, they would have chosen her last time and made the half white guy wait. They didn't.
Click to expand...

Just because Obama talked the better talk and had less dirt on him that usually comes with less experience, doesn't mean Clinton wouldn't have beat Corporate Puppet Mitt Romney.......

And as far as your Howard the Duck signature....the only reason you think this board sucks is because you lose every debate on here. Brains generally win.
 
Anti-Party said:
Just because Obama talked the better talk and had less dirt on him that usually comes with less experience, doesn't mean Clinton wouldn't have beat Corporate Puppet Mitt Romney.......

And as far as your Howard the Duck signature....the only reason you think this board sucks is because you lose every debate on here. Brains generally win.
Click to expand...

So you libs were impressed by speeches? How shallow

As for your last statement it is transcendent in its utter stupidity. For someone who claims to have so much intelligence, how can you not know that the Howard the Duck reference is to Howie and his constant references to "his forum"? You seriously didn't know that? Seriously?

:rofl2:

Thanks for the laughs. Bless yer heart
 
I Love America said:
So you libs were impressed by speeches? How shallow

As for your last statement it is transcendent in its utter stupidity. For someone who claims to have so much intelligence, how can you not know that the Howard the Duck reference is to Howie and his constant references to "his forum"? You seriously didn't know that? Seriously?

:rofl2:



Thanks for the laughs. Bless yer heart
Click to expand...

When two people stand for the same thing, yea, you pretty much listen to what they say and look at their past. Not too bright there kiddo.

Anything to say on the actual topic?...............didn't think so child. You never do. You are the classic case of "Internet troll" by definition. No debate at all. No facts at all. Only harassment of people. You must get picked on in real life. Come to the internet to stalk people and start keyboard fights with insults. Coward.

Try debating politics for once kiddo.
 
Anti-Party said:
When two people stand for the same thing, yea, you pretty much listen to what they say and look at their past. Not too bright there kiddo.

Anything to say on the actual topic?...............didn't think so child. You never do. You are the classic case of "Internet troll" by definition. No debate at all. No facts at all. Only harassment of people. You must get picked on in real life. Come to the internet to stalk people and start keyboard fights with insults. Coward.

Try debating politics for once kiddo.
Click to expand...

All you had to do is say you were wrong, but I guess that is too hard for you.

It is laughable that you accuse others of not debating facts when all you do is argue false premises.
 
This is interesting ... Media Matters backs Priebus:


The founder of Media Matters for America, a liberal non-profit that works to monitor and correct conservative misinformation in the media, on Tuesday echoed the Republican National Committe in calling on NBC and CNN to cancel their scheduled programming on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

In letters to the chairman of NBC Entertainment, Robert Greenblatt, and CNN President Jeff Zucker, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus slammed the networks' "thinly-veiled attempt at putting a thumb on the scales of the 2016 presidential election" as unfair to other potential candidates from both parties, threatening to pull the networks' partnerships for the 2016 presidential primary debates.

"Given that this project could coincide with a potential Clinton presidential campaign, the timing raises too many questions about fairness and conflicts of interest ahead of the 2016 election," Media Matters founder David Brock wrote in a letters to top network executives.

TPM: Media Matters Backs RNC, Calls On CNN And NBC To Pull Clinton Productions​
 
Thanks, Sedan - but while all of us might roll our eyes at a film of Clinton in an election year, I don't think this is the issue here. I think the issue of the op is the hypocrisy of the repubs complaining about this when they haven't complained about movies about Romney and McCain in the past, and they are doing NOTHING about the influence of corporate money in the election process.

And to be threatening to pull debates at this juncture - a) no one knows what the movie will say ; b) we don't know if she's running ; and c) after those pitiful debates last time, who cares what channel they are on?

Priebus is only complaining about this because it's about a dem, not because of the principal of it, and he got reamed royally for that.
 
tekkychick said:
Thanks, Sedan - but while all of us might roll our eyes at a film of Clinton in an election year, I don't think this is the issue here. I think the issue of the op is the hypocrisy of the repubs complaining about this when they haven't complained about movies about Romney and McCain in the past, and they are doing NOTHING about the influence of corporate money in the election process.

And to be threatening to pull debates at this juncture - a) no one knows what the movie will say ; b) we don't know if she's running ; and c) after those pitiful debates last time, who cares what channel they are on?

Priebus is only complaining about this because it's about a dem, not because of the principal of it, and he got reamed royally for that.
Click to expand...

Suppression of information is cult.

The ability to debate any information is elite.
 
Anti-Party said:
Just because Obama talked the better talk and had less dirt on him that usually comes with less experience, doesn't mean Clinton wouldn't have beat Corporate Puppet Mitt Romney.......

And as far as your Howard the Duck signature....the only reason you think this board sucks is because you lose every debate on here. Brains generally win.
Click to expand...

Hard to get more corporate than Hillary Clinton .. unless you're Barack Obama.

Clinton (both of them), Obama, Romney .. not a dimes bit of corporate difference between them.

The same is true for the Democratic and Republican parties.

American presidential elections are all about which corporate puppet will win from which corporate-owned party.
 
blackascoal said:
Hard to get more corporate than Hillary Clinton .. unless you're Barack Obama.

Clinton (both of them), Obama, Romney .. not a dimes bit of corporate difference between them.

The same is true for the Democratic and Republican parties.

American presidential elections are all about which corporate puppet will win from which corporate-owned party.
Click to expand...

Ok, lesson time kiddo.

The LEFT fights against Corporate funding of elections because corporations are not people, they are a group of people with monetary interest. Basic stuff.

Sure the Left is bought too. If you paid any attention to my threads then you noticed I teach you can currently tell what a politician will do by looking at his campaign donors. Obama did exactly what his top ten donors paid for. Looking at the donor differences can paint quite a different America if Corporate Romney would have won.. Some of the top donors from last election that resulted in American changes;

Obama; College, wind energy (used stimulus money for wind energy), gays (started the fight for M.E.), military weapons contractor (bombed Libya), big banks (didn't get put in jail)
Romney; Sin city, toxic waste disposal, big oil, military weapons contractor, coal, big banks

So yea, everyone is purchased right now because the IDIOTS that say Corporations are people have a cult behind them that will repeat every word they say without questioning it or thinking about it. Simple minded parrots. All we can do is look at the sponsors/donors and listen to the campaign talk. They will align and you will be able to see what this person will do if elected.
 
Anti-Party said:
Ok, lesson time kiddo.

The LEFT fights against Corporate funding of elections because corporations are not people, they are a group of people with monetary interest. Basic stuff.

Sure the Left is bought too. If you paid any attention to my threads then you noticed I teach you can currently tell what a politician will do by looking at his campaign donors. Obama did exactly what his top ten donors paid for. Looking at the donor differences can paint quite a different America if Corporate Romney would have won.. Some of the top donors from last election that resulted in American changes;

Obama; College, wind energy (used stimulus money for wind energy), gays (started the fight for M.E.), military weapons contractor (bombed Libya), big banks (didn't get put in jail)
Romney; Sin city, toxic waste disposal, big oil, military weapons contractor, coal, big banks

So yea, everyone is purchased right now because the IDIOTS that say Corporations are people have a cult behind them that will repeat every word they say without questioning it or thinking about it. Simple minded parrots. All we can do is look at the sponsors/donors and listen to the campaign talk. They will align and you will be able to see what this person will do if elected.
Click to expand...

Good thing you're here to school bac. He's just another one of those Fox News cult guys who can't think for himself and believes everything corporations tell him. Hopefully you've set him straight.
 
cawacko said:
Good thing you're here to school bac. He's just another one of those Fox News cult guys who can't think for himself and believes everything corporations tell him. Hopefully you've set him straight.
Click to expand...

A socialist that follows Fox News....that's a new one...

You should read more and type less.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top