CNBC Poll: Tump won the debate 67% Hillary 33%.

Pundits claim who wins debates. People say who won their vote.
This was billed as whether trump could rule the small screen. And he did. Wasn't close.

She set the agenda and the topic. He responded to her most of the night.
 
it depends on which way the wind blows

Literally. If you call something climate change... (Hint: the climate changes all the time) Then you have to be wrong to oppose it.

But the fact that they've had to change the title of it, 3 times now, makes me question it. We also haven't had warming in 18 years.
 
CNBC poll with over a million responses shows the Republican candidate winning with 67% to Clinton’s 33%; a TIME poll with about 1.6 million votes has him leading his Democratic opponent 55% to 45%; he is also ahead in a Fox News poll

I've never seen a group of people more desperate than libtars. "Its not scientific, Its a survey!" Only the CNN poll is right!" Lmao, funny watching them trip over themselves.

It's because liberals are really becoming scared that HiLIARy will lose; because of what the public knows about her and her behavior.
This has led them to begin chanting the liberals new talking points and they are turning it into a mantra.

Failure at it's finest. :D
 
Last edited:
didnt they poll like double the democrats than the republicans?

At least the online one is kinda random. If you think about it too it should favor hillary. We keep hearing how the young (who are more tech savvy) support her while the older generation support trump. She should be killing trump in online polls.

CNN had to find some way to get past all the liberals they polled, who probably said HiLIARy lost and then CNN had to disavow and ignore those; because it didn't fit their agenda. :D
 
The true test of who won the debate will come in about a week from now when battleground states will poll moving towards Clinton.
This wasn't a ball game where a winner can be decided immediately. It was a comparative appeal to prove themselves worthy of the office.
Trumpf failed to meet that goal, and time and the polls will bear that out.
 
The true test of who won the debate will come in about a week from now when battleground states will poll moving towards Clinton.
This wasn't a ball game where a winner can be decided immediately. It was a comparative appeal to prove themselves worthy of the office.
Trumpf failed to meet that goal, and time and the polls will bear that out.

Why didn't you just say that you were making excuses, BOY?
 
CNN had to find some way to get past all the liberals they polled, who probably said HiLIARy lost and then CNN had to disavow and ignore those; because it didn't fit their agenda. :D

Why is CNN so in the tank for HIllary? I knew they were liberal, but this hillary support is a new level.
 
The true test of who won the debate will come in about a week from now when battleground states will poll moving towards Clinton.
This wasn't a ball game where a winner can be decided immediately. It was a comparative appeal to prove themselves worthy of the office.
Trumpf failed to meet that goal, and time and the polls will bear that out.

If Trumpf is so dumb and worthless, why is queen Hillary, the smartest women on earth, tied with him??
 
Pundits claim who wins debates. People say who won their vote.
This was billed as whether trump could rule the small screen. And he did. Wasn't close.

ABOVE find the contrast between Obama supporters after his 1st debate and Trump supporters after Monday's debate.

Obama supporters were able to admit he lost...not so much with Trump supporters.

Jarod pointed this out and naturally ILA denied it.
 
Trump supporters artificially manipulated the results of online polls to create a false narrative that the Republican nominee won the first presidential debate on Monday night.

The efforts originated from users of r/The_Donald and 4chan, which bombarded around 70 polls, including those launched by Time, Fortune, and CNBC.

Multiple Reddit users enlisted the Trump-supporting masses on r/The_Donald, which has over 200,000 subscribers, by posting dozens of online polls that are vulnerable to vote brigading, bots, and other forms of manipulation that make these non-scientific surveys notoriously unreliable.

On 4chan's /pol/ board, users shared links to active polls along with instructions for how to maximize their impact on the results.

4chan, the notorious message board, has a long history of botting online competitions.


http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/trump-clinton-debate-online-polls-4chan-the-donald/
 
Cnn's wasn't? So you are arguing all polls that favored hillary are scientific and all the ones that don't aren't?
That's correct. Instead of selectively redacting text from your source, why not research the topic first?

Because the truth won't fit your agenda. CNN had pre selected a small group of contributors.

Contrast that with the online polls that allow people to vote as many times as they want to.

Your own article downplays the integrity of its own poll

Many online polls are labeled with caveats, warning readers that they are not scientific surveys; nor do they accurately represent the American electorate. The Daily Dot reports that supporters of Donald Trump even took to sites like Reddit and 4Chan in an attempt to intentionally skew online polling results (including those of Fortune.com).
 
Back
Top