this is not a "defense of Trump". It's commentary by a world respected reporter's interview with HillaryAt some point, Trump worshippers are going to need a better defense than "But, Hillary!"
this is not a "defense of Trump". It's commentary by a world respected reporter's interview with HillaryAt some point, Trump worshippers are going to need a better defense than "But, Hillary!"
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/michele-bachmann_n_3099860.html http://www.citypages.com/news/no-one-is-buying-michele-bachmanns-book-6559654 http://www.startribune.com/michele-bachmann-book-tour-faces-new-questions/203314741/ https://www.today.com/popculture/palin-book-tour-avoids-democratic-strongholds-wbna33611944 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/books/15book.html http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/25/politics/return-of-sarah-palin/index.html Gawd you're stupid. Now, pretend those aren't records of Bachmann and Palin being criticized for doing book tours, cunt face.
You're slipping, sociopath. None of those links criticize the women specifically "for doing book tours." None of those links state that the women are inserting themselves into policy criticisms.this is not a "defense of Trump". It's commentary by a world respected reporter's interview with Hillary
None of those links criticize the women specifically "for doing book tours."

distraction from WHAT??It's distraction, which is by extension a defense of Trump.
Hillary is powerless and done w/ even having a chance for power, and yet you & yours still start threads about her every day. You're as deranged as anyone who is against Trump - except that the latter's feeling are much more justified, since he actually leads the nation.
So, yeah - it's a defense of Trump. It's "But....Hillary!"
It's distraction, which is by extension a defense of Trump. Hillary is powerless and done w/ even having a chance for power, and yet you & yours still start threads about her every day. You're as deranged as anyone who is against Trump - except that the latter's feeling are much more justified, since he actually leads the nation. So, yeah - it's a defense of Trump. It's "But....Hillary!"
I told you to pretend those aren't records of Bachmann and Palin being criticized for doing book tours, cunt face, and you obeyed me. Good little pussy.
![]()
Spare us all your aphorisms and apothegms, I suggest that you use your arse as an archive for them!
More word games, sociopath? You're not that good at it.

I'm just waiting till the day they finally realize all they are doing is talking to themselves
I wanted to go into that compound last year but they wouldn't let me in. It is now been reduced to consulate status and is not open to tourists. I found truly ironic that there were Vietnamese troops outside guarding it alongside US military.WOW! he was on the roof of the American embassy in Saigon!
So he's got lifetime of experience, and a good idea of politicians and war.
He's dead nails on about Hillary and Libya and Assange..IMPRESSIVE!
when Hillary #STFU about Trump and the election,and her vile wamongering we'll #STFU about her.
when Hillary #STFU about Trump and the election,and her vile wamongering we'll #STFU about her.
Until then she's newsworthy because she chooses to be in the news-you can't go around injecting your views
and then say you're above criticism because you're a Clinton
your inability to refuted the obvious truth is noted.Your derangement is noted.
I can't always ban people as I am out a lot and use Tapatalk. I like Christie even if we don't always agree about politics, anyway you've had your last warning.Bollocks, you cunt. I've lost count of the number of times you've raged about forgetting to ban Desh from your threads.
Didn't you start a thread wondering why cunts like Christiecrite are offended by being called cunts recently?
Think she needs a knight in whining armor to protect her from the kind of language she ignores when Buckly and Desh use it?
Your derangement is noted.

your inability to refuted the obvious truth is noted.
Hillary is acting as a political figure.
this is not a "defense of Trump". It's commentary by a world respected reporter's interview with Hillary
It's just bullshit and bluster, she is still determined to be part of the narrative, so fuck 'em.distraction from WHAT??
Clinton gets to go around the world,make spurious charges, spread lies about her candidacy and the election
( and Assange and Libya) and a reporter is smart enough to call her out on it.
She injects herself into the news cycle as well..and the proper response is what?? stay moot? why?