Climate scientists trying to influence policy through fraud

Lots of desperation in the church of the burning planet.
The jig is up and they have nothing left but screeching
 
noise said:
Scientists call out New York Times for incorrect claim about climate report
Scientists appear to have debunked The New York Times' claim it was leaked a secret, gloomy climate change report which it published amid fears President Trump would suppress it.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...for-incorrect-claim-about-climate-report.html
Click to expand...

The draft has been avaliable for some time now, it was issued for exactly that reason, for peer review, but the final report has to be signed by the President to make it official, and that is why the scientists leaked it, so if the White House ignores it it isn't forgotten

Your Fox article is misleading
 
 
archives said:
Is it my fault, and not whoever "legion" is, that you can't handle the facts?
Click to expand...
Who are you then, Desh's brother? No facts, it is clear that the data was manipulated!


After

86292d9e5a8727caa4aac9452408e886.jpg


Before

dc9f33750babb4f63701f46b36a060b4.jpg
 
Corazón said:
Who are you then, Desh's brother? No facts, it is clear that the data was manipulated!


After

86292d9e5a8727caa4aac9452408e886.jpg


Before

dc9f33750babb4f63701f46b36a060b4.jpg
Click to expand...

"No facts?"

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/

https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/

I deliver acknowledged documentation and you respond with two cherry picked graphs and say "no facts?"

Can lead a horse to water but you can't make him.......................

As I noted, getting silly as the "Birther" arguments
 
archives said:
"No facts?"

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/

https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/

I deliver acknowledged documentation and you respond with two cherry picked graphs and say "no facts?"

Can lead a horse to water but you can't make him.......................

As I noted, getting silly as the "Birther" arguments
Click to expand...
I already pointed out the letter that 49 former NASA scientists, astronauts and engineers sent in 2012 complaining about exactly this sort of politicising. So it's totally pointless you posting the same old bullshit over and over. All that stuff comes from the Hansen/Schmidt era.

Why don't you tell me that they can't be believed because they aren't climate scientists but only mere rocket scientists?

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/04...emprical-evidence-rather-than-climate-models/
 
Last edited:
archives said:
"No facts?"

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/

https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/

I deliver acknowledged documentation and you respond with two cherry picked graphs and say "no facts?"

Can lead a horse to water but you can't make him.......................

As I noted, getting silly as the "Birther" arguments
Click to expand...

Lots of assertions, no facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top